ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05926752PMPPUpdated Jul 3, 2023

Photobiomodulation for Myofascial Pelvic Pain

An interventional study of SoLá therapy and Pelvic floor physical therapy in Pelvic Pain, Levator Ani Syndrome and Spastic Pelvic Floor Syndrome, sponsored by Orlando VA Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-03.

Sponsored by Orlando VA Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2024, 2 years 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2021, registered Jun 2023).
  • Started Oct 2021; still recruiting 5 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of photobiomodulation of the pelvic floor muscles in female Veterans with chronic pelvic pain. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is there a difference in reduction in overall pelvic pain between women who undergo photobiomodulation compared to women who received pelvic floor physical therapy?
  • Is there a difference in compliance with therapy between the two groups? Participants will be randomized to treatment with either 9 treatments of photobiomodulation (two treatments per week) or 8 weeks of pelvic floor physical therapy (one treatment a week). Researchers will compare both groups to see if there is a difference in overall pelvic pain reduction.
Read the detailed description

Background:

Myofascial pelvic pain (MFPP) is defined as pain in the pelvic floor muscles, the pelvic floor connective tissue, and the surrounding fascia. Standard treatment options of MFPP include pharmacotherapy and pelvic floor physical therapy (PT). In severe cases (approximately 25%) who are not responsive to therapy, pudendal blocks and trigger point injections (TPs) may be used to temporarily alleviate pain and improve function. However, these are more invasive and may require anesthesia. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) delivered by a low-level laser emitter has recently emerged as a treatment option for musculoskeletal disorders such as neck and low back pain. In patients with vaginal musculoskeletal pain, PBMT is also thought to be effective with minimal side-effects. SoLá is low-level pelvic laser emitter / photobiomodulation device that has FDA approval for intravaginal use to specifically treat myofascial pelvic pain and chronic pelvic pain. Although it is FDA approved and thought to be effective and less invasive, photobiomodulation using SoLá has not been rigorously studied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Study Aims:

The primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of SoLá pelvic therapy by comparing reduction in overall pelvic pain between women who undergo 9 treatments of photobiomodulation with SoLá (approximately 1 treatment twice a week), compared to women who receive standard pelvic floor PT once a week for 8 weeks. The secondary aim is to compare dyspareunia, pain with sitting, and compliance with therapy between the two groups.

Study Design and Methods:

The investigators will conduct a RCT comparing overall pelvic pain (primary outcome), dyspareunia, and pain with sitting in women who receive PBMT with SoLá (group 1) vs. women who receive pelvic floor PT (group 2). Twenty-eight total participants will be randomized to either study group after providing informed consent. After enrollment, participants will be treated with 8 weekly treatments of pelvic PT or 9 treatments of SoLá (administered twice weekly). Patient outcomes will be evaluated at baseline (before treatment 1), midway through their treatment (before treatment 5 of SoLá and treatment 5 of PT), and at the end of their treatment (1-2 weeks after treatment 8 of PT/treatment 9 of SoLá and 3 months after treatment 8 of PT/treatment 9 of SoLá). Pain levels will be assessed using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) which assesses sensory and affective components of pain, Pain Interference Short Form which evaluates the effect of pain on quality of life, and pain severity on a 1-10cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Anticipated Results:

The investigators hypothesize that women who undergo PBMT will demonstrate greater improvements in all pain outcomes when compared to pelvic floor PT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Pain
  • Levator Ani Syndrome
  • Spastic Pelvic Floor Syndrome
  • Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome
  • Myalgia of Pelvic Floor

Keywords

  • photobiomodulation
  • pelvic floor physical therapy
  • chronic pelvic pain
  • spastic pelvic floor syndrome
  • levator ani syndrome
  • myalgia of pelvic floor
03

In context

Pelvic Pain

375 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Pain; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 28 is below the median of 60 across 277 interventional studies indexed under Pelvic Pain.

Browse Pelvic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Orlando VA Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically diagnosed MFPP
  • Age ≥ 18
  • Able to provide
  • English speaking
  • Agree not to participate in any other form of treatment of myofascial pelvic pain for 3 months after end of trial

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior pelvic floor physical therapy or SoLá therapy for pelvic pain
  • Pregnancy documented by urine or blood
  • Taking drugs that have heat- or light- sensitive
  • Reporting decreased sensation in the vagina or rectum or if they are found to have abnormalities on the external neurosensory exam of the vagina
  • Have a known history of cancer of the cervix, vagina, uterus, bladder, or vulva or suspected to have neoplasia or pre-cancerous lesions
  • Have an active infection of the bladder, vagina, vulva, or urethra
  • Have active vaginal bleeding or blood in the vaginal canal
  • Have evidence of active vaginal trauma, ulcerations, erosions, or other evidence of vaginal and vulvar skin breakdown
  • Cannot tolerate vaginal examination either due to discomfort, pain or history or traumatic experience
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Photobiomodulation

    The participant will be treated with intravaginal SoLá photobiomodulation therapy for a total of nine treatments (two treatments a week). Each treatment lasting 5 minutes.

    Device: SoLá therapy

  • Active comparator
    Pelvic Floor Physical therapy

    The participant will be treated with pelvic floor physical therapy once a week for 8 weeks. Physical therapy involves standard approach of manual therapy including trigger point release, soft tissue mobilization, stretching, biofeedback, breathing techniques, relaxation yoga, and therapeutic exercises.

    Other: Pelvic floor physical therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceSoLá therapy

    SoLá therapy is a photobiomodulation device that works by stimulating mitochondria, soothing tense muscles, and promotes healing.

  • OtherPelvic floor physical therapy

    Physical therapy is manual myofascial release, muscles stretches, and exercises designed to help myofascial pelvic pain

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pelvic Pain Intensity

    Change pelvic pain intensity using a 0-10cm visual analog scale. High score means a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intensity of Dyspareunia

    Change in dyspareunia intensity using a 0-10cm visual analog scale. High score means a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post treatment

  2. Intensity of pain with sitting

    Change in intensity of pain with sitting using a 0-10cm visual analog scale. High score means a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post treatment

  3. Pain interference

    change in the score from the Pain Interference Short Form 8A PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Health Organizations questionnaire. High score is associated with worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months post treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bonder JH, Chi M, Rispoli L. Myofascial Pelvic Pain and Related Disorders. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017 Aug;28(3):501-515. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2017.03.005. PubMed 28676361 ↗
  • Lamvu G, Carrillo J, Witzeman K, Alappattu M. Musculoskeletal Considerations in Female Patients with Chronic Pelvic Pain. Semin Reprod Med. 2018 Mar;36(2):107-115. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676085. Epub 2018 Dec 19. PubMed 30566976 ↗
  • Cichowski SB, Rogers RG, Komesu Y, Murata E, Qualls C, Murata A, Murata G. A 10-yr Analysis of Chronic Pelvic Pain and Chronic Opioid Therapy in the Women Veteran Population. Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e635-e640. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy114. PubMed 29788455 ↗
  • Fuentes-Marquez P, Cabrera-Martos I, Valenza MC. Physiotherapy interventions for patients with chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 Dec;35(12):1131-1138. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1472687. Epub 2018 May 14. PubMed 29757068 ↗
  • FitzGerald MP, Payne CK, Lukacz ES, Yang CC, Peters KM, Chai TC, Nickel JC, Hanno PM, Kreder KJ, Burks DA, Mayer R, Kotarinos R, Fortman C, Allen TM, Fraser L, Mason-Cover M, Furey C, Odabachian L, Sanfield A, Chu J, Huestis K, Tata GE, Dugan N, Sheth H, Bewyer K, Anaeme A, Newton K, Featherstone W, Halle-Podell R, Cen L, Landis JR, Propert KJ, Foster HE Jr, Kusek JW, Nyberg LM; Interstitial Cystitis Collaborative Research Network. Randomized multicenter clinical trial of myofascial physical therapy in women with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome and pelvic floor tenderness. J Urol. 2012 Jun;187(6):2113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.123. Epub 2012 Apr 12. PubMed 22503015 ↗
  • Chow RT, Johnson MI, Lopes-Martins RA, Bjordal JM. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo or active-treatment controlled trials. Lancet. 2009 Dec 5;374(9705):1897-908. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61522-1. Epub 2009 Nov 13. Erratum In: Lancet. 2010 Mar 13;375(9718):894. PubMed 19913903 ↗
  • Glazov G, Yelland M, Emery J. Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Acupunct Med. 2016 Oct;34(5):328-341. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2015-011036. Epub 2016 May 20. PubMed 27207675 ↗
  • Lev-Sagie A, Kopitman A, Brzezinski A. Low-Level Laser Therapy for the Treatment of Provoked Vestibulodynia-A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial. J Sex Med. 2017 Nov;14(11):1403-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 29. PubMed 28970071 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Final data sets underlying publications resulting from the proposed research will not be shared outside VA, except as required under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2024, 27 months after the start.

Of 110 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pelvic Pain, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 30. This study's planned 27 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 114 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 30.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 9, 2023
First posted
Jul 3, 2023
StartActual
Oct 27, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Aug 1, 2024
Last update
Jul 3, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05926752
Lead sponsor
Orlando VA Medical Center
Responsible party
Mario Castellanos (Physician, Orlando VA Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 3, 2023
Start date
Oct 27, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 3, 2023

Study contacts

Chensi Ouyang, MD
Contact
chensi.ouyang@va.gov
4076314010
Mario Castellanos, MD
Contact
mario.castellanos@va.gov
4076314010

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion