CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05916638MOSARUpdated Mar 3, 2026

MoMa Signature During Granulomatosis

An observational study in Sarcoidosis and Tuberculosis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-03.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by unspecific granuloma formation. Our hypothesis is that granuloma formation and maintenance mainly relies on the overactivation of monocytes (Mo) and macrophages (Ma). To this end, the study aims (i) to define MoMa systemic signature in sarcoidosis, (ii) to characterize this signature in situ on tissue samples, and (iii) to identify causative factors that participate to the MoMa chronic overactivation. Thus, a cohort of sarcoidosis patients will be compared with tuberculosis patients. The MoMa systemic signature will be defined on whole blood (TruCulture model) and then in situ through different methods (multi-parameter spectral flow cytometry, RNA-seq, Luminex, imaging mass cytometry). The epigenome of monocytes will be studied thanks to CUT\&Tag. The MoMa systemic signature will be defined ex vivo at different time points during the course of the disease with phenotypic, transcriptomic, cytokine and functional approaches. The previously identified signature will be studied in situ and completed by the characterization of granuloma architecture and microenvironmental interactions, which could be modulated by epigenetic modifications. Hence, the epigenome of monocytes will be analyzed in two groups (sarcoidosis and tuberculosis). These results would allow to better understand sarcoidosis physiopathology and, in fine, may raise new therapeutic strategies. Finally, the study could challenge the dogma on innate immunity/auto-inflammation versus adaptive immunity/auto-immunity/memory.

Read the detailed description

"Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disease characterized by the presence of coalescing, tightly clustered, non-necrotizing granulomas. The diagnosis is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical presentation, the presence of non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation, and the exclusion of alternative granulomatous diseases. A wide range of clinical phenotypes are observed depending on the location of the granulomatous lesions which can affect any organ, with the lungs being the most affected site. Sarcoidosis shares many similarities with tuberculosis, in which granuloma formation is triggered by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb). These phenotypic similarities between the two diseases present many challenges for diagnosis, clinical management and therapy.

Our understanding of the factors that contribute to sarcoidosis development, granuloma formation and maintenance remains limited. Part of this challenge is that granuloma development may involve both environmental and genetic factors, which contribute to the recruitment of immune cells to form the granuloma. Immune cells involved in the granuloma include (1) CD4 Th1 and Th17 T cells and their associated cytokines (e.g, IFNγ, TNFα, IL-17, IL-2); and (2) monocytes (Mo) and macrophages (Ma) including proinflammatory M1 and pro-fibrosis M2 types. However, the specific factors that contribute to granuloma maintenance and evolution remain to be identified. Among them, we can hypothesized that trained immunity, persistence of the antigen, or the microenvironment are involved in this chronic dysregulated immune response. Such an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease may allow development of new treatments, as currently corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy.

Our main hypothesis is that granuloma formation and maintenance mainly relies on the overactivation of monocytes (Mo) and macrophages (Ma). To this end, the study aims (i) to define MoMa systemic signature in sarcoidosis, (ii) to characterize this signature in situ on tissue samples, and (iii) to identify causative factors that participate to the MoMa chronic overactivation. Thus, a cohort of sarcoidosis patients will be compared with tuberculosis patients. The MoMa systemic signature will be defined on whole blood (TruCulture model) and then in situ through different methods (multi-parameter spectral flow cytometry, RNA-seq, Luminex, imaging mass cytometry). The epigenome of monocytes will be studied thanks to CUT\&Tag. The MoMa systemic signature will be defined ex vivo at different time points (M0, M6 and M12) during the course of the disease with phenotypic, transcriptomic, cytokine and functional approaches. The previously identified signature will be studied in situ and completed by the characterization of granuloma architecture and microenvironmental interactions, which could be modulated by epigenetic modifications. Hence, the epigenome of monocytes will be analyzed in two groups (sarcoidosis and tuberculosis). These results would allow to better understand sarcoidosis physiopathology and, in fine, may raise new therapeutic strategies. Finally, the study could challenge the dogma on innate immunity/auto-inflammation versus adaptive immunity/auto-immunity/memory."

02

Conditions studied

  • Sarcoidosis
  • Tuberculosis

Keywords

  • tuberculosis
  • sarcoidosis
  • granuloma
  • monocytes
  • macrophages
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis or tuberculosis

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male and female > 18 years old
  2. Diagnosis of sarcoidosis and of tuberculosis
  3. Affiliated to medical insurance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. HIV infection
  2. pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  3. Patient under legal protection, guardianship or curators
  4. Absence of signed consent" Secondary exclusion criteria Other causes of granulomatosis ultimately identified as sarcoidosis or tuberculosis
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Sarcoidosis

    patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis

    Other: blood sample

  • Tuberculosis

    patients diagnosed with tuberculosis

    Other: blood sample

Interventions

  • Otherblood sample

    blood sample collection

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. macrophage activation in sarcoidosis measured by epigenomic

    performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from peripheral blood

    Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up.

  2. monocyte activation in sarcoidosis measured by epigenomic

    performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from peripheral blood

    Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up.

  3. macrophage activation in sarcoidosis measured by spatial transcriptomics

    performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from peripheral blood

    Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up.

  4. monocyte activation in sarcoidosis measured by spatial transcriptomics

    performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from peripheral blood

    Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up.

  5. monocyte activation in sarcoidosis measured by transcriptomic

    performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from peripheral blood

    Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up.

  6. macrophage activation in sarcoidosis measured by transcriptomic

    performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from peripheral blood

    Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up.

  7. macrophage activation in sarcoidosis measured by cytokine measurement

    performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from peripheral blood

    Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up.

  8. monocyte activation in sarcoidosis measured by cytokine measurement

    performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from peripheral blood

    Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. monocyte activation in tuberculosis measured by epigenomic

    Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up.

  2. Identification of a pathogen that triggers sarcoidosis development by metagenomic study

    Time frame: Samples collected before treatment/at diagnosis

  3. identification of epigenetic modifications of monocytes by CUT&Tag method

    CUT\&Tag-sequencing, also known as cleavage under targets and tagmentation, is a method used to analyze protein interactions with DNA

    Time frame: 12 months of follow-up.

  4. Identification of a diagnostic test to discriminate sarcoidosis and tuberculosis

    measurement of IFNγ secretion by whole blood in response to stimulation by tuberculosis antigen

    Time frame: Samples collected before treatment/at diagnosis

  5. real-time analysis of oxidative phosphorylation of monocyte

    By Seahorse methode

    Time frame: up to 12 months of follow-up

  6. real-time analysis of glycolysis of monocytes

    by seahorse method

    Time frame: up to 12 month of follow up

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hôpital Bichat
    Paris, 75018, France
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05916638
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 23, 2023
Start date
Jan 15, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 3, 2026

Study contacts

Karim Sacre, MD-PhD, PU-PH
Contact
karim.sacre@aphp.fr
0140256019 ext. +33
Darragh DUFFY, PhD
Contact
darragh.duffy@pasteur.fr
0144389334 ext. +33
Karim SACRE, MD-PhD, PU-PH
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion