CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05913830Updated Jun 22, 2023

Effectiveness of Auricular Acupressure on the Methadone Patient

An interventional study of Auricular pressure in Conditions:Effectiveness of Auricular Acupressure on the Methadone Patient, sponsored by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-22.

Sponsored by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2022, registered May 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to investigate the effect of auricular point sticking on constipation in patients with methadone

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial, taking 72 methadone constipation patients from a hospital in the north as objects, and divided them into an auricular point group and a control group. The experimental group was given auricular point sticking, while the control group only used sticking cloth. The two groups were measured for constipation, TCM constitution, anxiety, depression and quality of life before the intervention and 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after the start.

02

Conditions studied

  • Conditions:Effectiveness of Auricular Acupressure on the Methadone Patient
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 119 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Methadone patients over 20 years old.
  2. Those who have clear consciousness and can communicate in Chinese and Taiwanese.
  3. The frequency of defecation is less than three times a week.
  4. Willing to sign a written subject consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusions:

  1. Those with wounds, broken skin, and blisters on the skin of both ears.
  2. People with blood coagulation problems and related diseases, such as: purpura, hemophilia, etc.
  3. Age \<20 years old.
  4. Subjects who use drugs to improve constipation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group:

    Experimental Group A total of 36 methadone patients will receive auricular pressure

    Other: Auricular pressure

  • No intervention
    Control group:

    Control group 36 bits No interventions implemented

Interventions

  • OtherAuricular pressure

    The seeds of blancia blanc were fixed on the acupoints with patches. The intervention measure in the experimental group was auricular point sticking. The two groups received four measurements before the intervention and 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after the start; while the control group received no Auricular pressure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The effect of constipation after auricular acupressure

    There were significant between-group differences in Bristol Stool Type at Weeks 2, 4, and 6 between the two groups (p= .003, p \< .001, p \< .001, respectively). The distribution of Bristol Stool Types in the second week, the fourth week, and the sixth week of the above-mentioned auricular point sticking intervention in the two groups all had statistically significant differences.

    Time frame: six weeks

  2. The effect of TCM constitution after the intervention of auricular acupressure

    The total score of the experimental group in the 2nd week and the 6th week was damp and hot (p \< .05); the experimental group had a significant difference in the decrease of the total score of the qi stagnation in the 4th week and the 6th week (p \< .05).

    Time frame: six weeks

  3. The effect of intervention on depression and anxiety after auricular acupressure

    There was no significant difference in the scores of the Bayesian Anxiety Scale and depression between the experimental group and the control group at the 2nd week, 4th week and 6th week (p \> .05).

    Time frame: six weeks

  4. Effect of Interventional Auricular Acupressure on Quality of Life for Constipation

    There were significant differences in the decrease of the total score of the experimental group in the 2nd week, 4th week and 6th week (p \< .05, p \< .001, p \< .001 respectively)

    Time frame: six weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ya-Fang Lin
    Taipei, 108, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05913830
Lead sponsor
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Collaborators
Taipei City Hospital
Responsible party
Ya-Fang Lin (National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 22, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022
Completion
Mar 31, 2023
Last update
Jun 22, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion