ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07243717Updated Apr 8, 2026

Information-Assisted Intervention for Potential Living Kidney Donors

An interventional study of Information-Assisted Intervention in Transplant Donation, sponsored by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-08.

Sponsored by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an information-assisted intervention in enhancing knowledge, decision self-efficacy, and reducing decisional conflict among potential living kidney donors. Using a one-group pretest-posttest design, participants will be recruited from the urology and kidney transplant outpatient clinics of two hospitals in northern Taiwan. After providing informed consent and completing a baseline questionnaire (T0), participants will receive a four-week information-assisted intervention in addition to routine care, with follow-up assessments at 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2). Data will be collected using structured questionnaires assessing decisional conflict, decision self-efficacy, knowledge, positive thinking, family resilience, and satisfaction with the intervention.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of an information-assisted intervention in improving knowledge, decision self-efficacy, and decisional conflict among potential living kidney donors.

A one-group pretest-posttest design will be adopted. During the study period, participants will be recruited through convenience sampling from the urology and kidney transplant outpatient clinics of two hospitals in northern Taiwan. Eligible potential donors who have completed medical examinations and return for follow-up visits to review tissue matching and laboratory test results will be invited to participate in the study (experimental group). After providing informed consent, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire (T0) in a private setting.

Participants will then receive the information-assisted intervention, followed by the first posttest (T1) at 4 weeks and the second posttest (T2) at 8 weeks after T0. In addition to routine care, the experimental group will receive a four-week information-assisted intervention.

Data will be collected using structured questionnaires, including the Decisional Conflict Scale, Decision Self-Efficacy Scale, Knowledge Test on Living Kidney Donation, Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Questionnaire, Positive Thinking Scale, Evaluation Form for the Information-Assisted Program, and the Family Resilience Scale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Transplant Donation

Keywords

  • Potential Living Kidney Donors
  • knowledge
  • decision self-efficacy
  • decisional conflict
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 124 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing to undergo evaluation for living kidney donation
  • Owns a smartphone or tablet with internet access
  • Able and willing to participate in the study and provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Deemed unsuitable for kidney donation after evaluation by a transplant specialist

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Information-Assisted group

    Other: Information-Assisted Intervention

Interventions

  • OtherInformation-Assisted Intervention

    The intervention content was formulated based on previous Delphi study results and a comprehensive literature review. To facilitate comprehension, the educational materials were presented using illustrations, mind maps, tables, and concise text in an educational manual. Participants may record questions arising during their learning process, which will be discussed and clarified during consultation sessions by members of the transplant team, including physicians, social workers, and transplant coordinators.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Decision Self-Efficacy Scale

    The Chinese version of the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale from the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute will be used. This 11-item scale measures individuals' confidence in making informed decisions. Each item is scored from 0-4, with total scores converted to a range of 0-100. Higher scores reflect stronger decision self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention), 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after Baseline

  2. Decisional Conflict Scale

    The study will employ the Chinese version of the Decisional Conflict Scale developed by the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. The 16-item scale uses a 0-4 rating system (0 = yes, 4 = no). Total scores are calculated as (sum of items ÷ number of items) × 25, yielding a range of 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater decisional conflict.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention), 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after Baseline

  3. Knowledge Test on Living Kidney Donation

    A 31-item self-developed test will assess participants' knowledge regarding living kidney donation, including anatomy, legal regulations, donor eligibility, medical coverage, surgical risks, postoperative complications, and post-surgical care. Each question has three options: True, False, and Unclear. Correct answers receive 1 point, while incorrect or unclear answers receive 0 points. Higher total scores indicate better knowledge.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention), 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Positive Thinking Scale

    The Chinese version of the Positive Thinking Scale will be employed to assess participants' optimism and goal orientation. The 18-item instrument has a total score range of 18-80, where higher scores indicate greater personal satisfaction and goal pursuit.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention), 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Family Resilience Scale

    The Short Form of the Chinese Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRAS) will be used to measure family resilience among potential donors. Each of the 32 items is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree), producing total scores from 32 to 128. Higher scores reflect greater family resilience.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  2. Evaluation of the Information-Assisted Program

    A five-item self-developed questionnaire will be used to evaluate participants' acceptance and satisfaction with the intervention. Scores range from 0-100, with higher values indicating stronger satisfaction and agreement that the intervention was beneficial and appropriate for future potential donors.

    Time frame: 4 weeks (T1) after Baseline

  3. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Age

    Actual age (years)

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  4. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Sex

    Male / Female

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  5. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Marital Status

    Single, Married, Divorced, Separated, Widowed, Cohabiting

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  6. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Education

    None, Elementary, Junior High, Senior High, College/University, Graduate/Doctorate, Other

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  7. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Religion

    None, Taoism, Buddhism, Catholicism, Christianity, I-Kuan Tao, Other

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  8. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Occupation

    None, Physically demanding, Mentally demanding, Both, Neither, Retired, Other

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  9. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Relationship to Recipient

    Spouse, Sibling, Parent-child, Relative, Other

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  10. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Perceived Health Status

    One item; Score range 0-100; higher = better health perception

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  11. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Chronic Diseases

    None, Diabetes, Hypertension, Heart disease, Asthma, Bronchitis, Other

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  12. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Serum Creatinine (mg/dL)

    Higher values indicate poorer renal function

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  13. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-24-h Creatinine Clearance (mL/min)

    Higher values indicate better renal function

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  14. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Estimated GFR (mL/min/1.73m²)

    Higher values indicate better renal function

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  15. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Urine Protein

    None, Present, Other

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  16. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Serum Creatinine-Body Weight (kilograms)

    Measured in kilograms

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  17. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Height (centimeters)

    Measured in centimeters

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  18. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Information Source

    None, Physician, Transplant Coordinator, Nurse/NP, Other

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  19. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Decision Status

    No, Considering, Yes

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention), 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after Baseline

  20. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Family Support

    Supportive, Neutral, Not supportive

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  21. Recipient-Related Clinical Data-Dialysis Treatment

    Yes / No (Hemodialysis or Peritoneal Dialysis)

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  22. Recipient-Related Clinical Data-Serum Creatinine (mg/dL)

    Higher values indicate poorer renal function

    Time frame: Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to the consideration of ethics, the researchers shall maintain the privacy of the participants, and research data should be used only for academic articles.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07243717
Responsible party
Ching-Hui Chien (RN, PhD, Professor, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 24, 2025
Start date
Mar 27, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2026

Study contacts

Ching-Hui Chien, PhD
Contact
chinghui@ntunhs.edu.tw
+886-2-28227101 ext. 3103

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion