ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05889689Updated Apr 30, 2026

Evaluation of an Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Program; Relationship Smarts+ With Lessons From Mind Matters

An interventional study of Relationship Smarts Plus & Mind Matters and Relationship Smarts Plus alone in Teen Pregnancy, Contraception Behavior and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, sponsored by Trinity Church Inc.. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 13 Years to 19 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-30.

Sponsored by Trinity Church Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
945
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
13 Years to 19 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized control trial (RCT) is to assess an innovative adolescent pregnancy prevention program among youth that are at the highest risk of adolescent pregnancy, to prevent pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs), including HIV/AIDS in the greater Miami area in Florida. The primary research question it aims to answer is:

(RQ1a): What is the effect of adding 4.5-hours from the Mind Matters trauma-coping skills curriculum to the Relationship Smarts Plus curriculum, on rates of unprotected sex among 13-19-year-old youth compared to those receiving only the Relationship Smarts Plus curriculum? (RQ1b): What is the effect of the Relationship Smarts Plus curriculum on rates of unprotected sex among 13-19-year-old youth compared to the control group receiving only financial literacy? Participants will complete program lessons and complete surveys for data collection.

The RCT will assess behavioral health outcomes and other psychological outcomes at four-time points (baseline, post-program, 3 months, and 12 months)

Read the detailed description

The intervention combines the pregnancy prevention curriculum, Relationship Smarts Plus (RSP+) with lessons from the trauma coping skills curriculum, Mind Matters (MM). The mental health component was added to assess the importance of mental health as a risk factor for teen pregnancy. Researchers will estimate the effect of Mind Matters (MM) by comparing the RSP+ \& MM treatment arm with the RSP+ treatment arm. This answers RQ1a: If MM has an impact, then researchers will answer RQ1b by comparing the RSP+ treatment arm with the control arm. If there's no impact, then RQ1b will be answered by comparing the pooled RSP+ and RSP+ \& MM treatment arms with the control arm.

This study is funded through the Personal Responsibility Education Program Innovative Strategies (PREIS), which is administered by the Family and Youth Services Bureau, part of Health and Human Services,

Trinity Church, Miami Gardens, is responsible for site and participant recruitment as well as the implementation of the intervention. Participants are randomized at the classroom level. All control group participants will only receive a financial literacy program.

AMTC \& Associates is the external evaluator, The Dibble Institute is the curricula developer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Teen Pregnancy
  • Contraception Behavior
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases
  • Reproductive Health
  • Sexual Risk Behavior
03

In context

Contraception Behavior

132 studies on the registry are indexed under Contraception Behavior; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 945 is above the median of 382 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Contraception Behavior.

Browse Contraception Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Trinity Church Inc. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
13 Years to 19 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

For schools to be included in the study:

They have to be located within the greater Miami area.

For individuals:

  1. Students enrolled in either 9th,10th, 11th and 12th grade
  2. Students who do not have severe cognitive, mental health, or behavioral impairment.
  3. Students with Individualized Education Plans who are part of the mainstream classrooms.
  4. Youth aged 13-19 residing in the greater Miami-Dade Communities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Students who do not consent to be in the study
  2. Students who are part of the pilot study
  3. Students who have been randomized in a previous cohort of the study
  4. Students with an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) who are in restricted placement will not be able to participate in the program as they will not be part of the mainstream classrooms where the program is implemented.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
945 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Relationship Smarts Plus & Mind Matters

    Relationship Smarts Plus (RSP+) is an adolescent pregnancy prevention curriculum that will be combined with lessons from a trauma-coping skills curriculum, Mind Matters (MM).

    Behavioral: Relationship Smarts Plus & Mind Matters

  • Experimental
    Relationship Smarts Plus

    Relationship Smarts Plus (RSP+) is an adolescent pregnancy prevention curriculum.

    Behavioral: Relationship Smarts Plus alone

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Financial literacy curriculum, Preparing Adolescents for Young Adulthood (PAYA)

    Behavioral: Preparing Adolescents for Young Adulthood (PAYA).

Interventions

  • BehavioralRelationship Smarts Plus & Mind Matters

    18.5 hours long intervention that combines the Relationship Smarts Plus teen pregnancy prevention curriculum with lessons from the Mind Matters trauma-coping skills curriculum

  • BehavioralRelationship Smarts Plus alone

    14-hour-long curriculum that addresses pregnancy prevention within the context of teaching relationship skills for young teens.

  • BehavioralPreparing Adolescents for Young Adulthood (PAYA).

    A financial literacy curriculum

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Unprotected sex as measured by 4 items from the survey. The 4 items will be combined to create a binary variable as an indicator of either protected sex or unprotected sex.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report lower rates of unprotected sex

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Unprotected sex as measured by 4 items from the survey. The 4 items will be combined to create a binary variable as an indicator of either protected sex or unprotected sex.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report lower rates of unprotected sex.

    Time frame: At 3 months after baseline data collection.

  2. Sexual intercourse as measured by a binary indicator asking participants if they ever engaged in sexual intercourse

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report lower rates of sexual intercourse

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  3. Sexual intercourse as measured by a binary indicator asking participants if they ever engaged in sexual intercourse

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report lower rates of sexual intercourse

    Time frame: At 3 months after baseline data collection

  4. Oral sex as measured by a single binary indicator asking participants if they ever engaged in oral sex

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report lower rates of oral sex

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  5. Oral sex as measured by a single binary indicator asking participants if they ever engaged in oral sex

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report lower rates of oral sex

    Time frame: At 3 months after baseline data collection

  6. Sexual Initiation as measured by a 7- item 5 response ordinal scale categorical indicator of when individuals intent to start engaging in different sexual activities

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report lower rates of sexual initiation

    Time frame: At 3 months and at 12 months after baseline data collection

  7. Sexual Initiation as measured by a 7- item 5 response ordinal scale categorical indicator of when individuals intent to start engaging in different sexual activities

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report lower rates of sexual initiation

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  8. Skills to negotiate abstinence & resist pressure to have sex measured by a 10-item scale on a 5-point scale showing how confident they are in answering each of the 10 items. A score will be calculated by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report they have the skills to negotiate abstinence and resist pressure to have sex.

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  9. Skills to negotiate abstinence & resist pressure to have sex measured by a 10-item scale on a 5-point scale showing how confident they are in answering each of the 10 items. A score will be calculated by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report they have the skills to negotiate abstinence and resist pressure to have sex.

    Time frame: At 3 months after baseline data collection

  10. Intent to use condoms as measured by a binary indicator that asks participants if they will use condoms and other contraceptives

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report intent to consistently use condoms.

    Time frame: At 3 months and at 12 months after baseline data collection

  11. Intent to use condoms as measured by a binary indicator that asks participants if they will use condoms and other contraceptives

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report intent to consistently use condoms.

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  12. Knowledge of HIV/STIs as measured by 8-item True/False/Unsure responses to survey items. Items will be scored as 1 if correct & 0 if incorrect. Composite scores of correct items will be calculated. Scores range from 0 to 8

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report higher knowledge of HIV/STIs.

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  13. Knowledge of HIV/STIs as measured by 8-item True/False/Unsure responses to survey items. Items will be scored as 1 if correct & 0 if incorrect. Composite scores of correct items will be calculated. Scores range from 0 to 8

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report higher knowledge of HIV/STIs.

    Time frame: At 3 months after baseline data collection

  14. Future-oriented goals as measured by a 10-item 6-point response scale, respondents will show how much they agree or disagree with each of the 10 statements. A score will be calculated for each of the respondents by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report having future-oriented goals

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  15. Future-oriented goals as measured by a 10-item 6-point response scale, respondents will show how much they agree or disagree with each of the 10 statements. A score will be calculated for each of the respondents by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report having future-oriented goals

    Time frame: At 3 months after baseline data collection

  16. Healthy life skills measured by a 12-item 6-point response scale, respondents will show how much they agree or disagree with each of the 12 items. A score will be calculated for each of the respondents by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report more health life skills

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  17. Healthy life skills measured by a 12-item 6-point response scale, respondents will show how much they agree or disagree with each of the 12 items. A score will be calculated for each of the respondents by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report more health life skills

    Time frame: At 3 months after baseline data collection

  18. Awareness of healthy relationships as measured by a 10-item 6-point response scale, respondents will show how much they agree or disagree with each of the 10 statements. A score will be calculated for each of the respondents by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report higher awareness of healthy relationships

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  19. Awareness of healthy relationships as measured by a 10-item 6-point response scale, respondents will show how much they agree or disagree with each of the 10 statements. A score will be calculated for each of the respondents by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report higher awareness of healthy relationships

    Time frame: At 3 months after baseline data collection

  20. General communication skills as measured by a 7-item scale on a 5-point scale, respondents will show how much they agree or disagree with each of the 7 statements. A score will be calculated for each of the respondents by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report more communication skills

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  21. General communication skills as measured by a 7-item scale on a 5-point scale, respondents will show how confident they are with each of the 7 statements. A score will be calculated for each of the respondents by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report more communication skills

    Time frame: At 3 months after baseline data collection

  22. Conflict resolution skills as measured using 8 items on a 5-point scale, respondents will show how confident they are in answering each of the 8 statements. A score will be calculated for each of the respondents by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report more conflict resolution skills

    Time frame: At 3 months and at 12 months after baseline data collection

  23. Conflict resolution skills as measured using 8 items on a five-point response scale, respondents will show how confident they are in answering each of the 8 statements. A score will be calculated for each of the respondents by averaging their responses.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report more conflict resolution skills

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  24. Resilience as measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). A 5 point rating of how participants have felt over the past month. Scores range from 0-4. An average score will be calculated.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report higher resiliency

    Time frame: At 12 months after baseline data collection

  25. Resilience as measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). A 5 point rating of how participants have felt over the past month. Scores range from 0-4. An average score will be calculated.

    The proportion of youth who, in comparison to the control group, report higher resiliency

    Time frame: At 3 months after baseline data collection

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Trinity Church Inc
    Miami Gardens, Florida 33169, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — At this time, there is no plan to share Individual Participant Data with other researchers

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05889689
Lead sponsor
Trinity Church Inc.
Collaborators
AMTC & Associates, Department of Health and Human Services
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2023
Start date
Sep 23, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 30, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion