ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05889507COMETUpdated Feb 6, 2026

Cooling in Mild Encephalopathy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Whole body hypothermia and Targeted normothermia in Neonatal Encephalopathy and Newborn Asphyxia, sponsored by Imperial College London. Recruiting at 39 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 1 Hour to 6 Hours. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-06.

Sponsored by Imperial College London · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
426
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Hour to 6 Hours
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomised control trial is to establish the safety and efficacy of whole-body hypothermia for babies with mild hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, inform national and international guidelines, and establish uniform practice across the NHS.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does whole-body cooling (33.5±0.5°C) initiated within six hours of birth and continued for 72 hours, improve cognitive development at 24 (±2) months of age after mild neonatal encephalopathy compared with normothermia (37±0.5°C)?
  2. Does a prospective trial-based economic evaluation support the provision of cooling therapy for mild encephalopathy in the NHS on cost-effectiveness grounds?

Participants will have the following interventions:

  • Randomisation into one of the following groups

    • Whole body hypothermia group
    • Targeted normothermia group
  • Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 4th Edition (Bayley-IV) examination at 24 (±2) months of age.

Researchers will compare the mean Cognitive Composite Scale score from the Bayley IV examination between the two groups.

Read the detailed description

COMET is a phase III prospective multi-centre open label two-arm randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot and masked outcome assessments. Administration of cooling therapy cannot be masked.

All babies born at or after 36 weeks and requiring prolonged resuscitation at birth (defined as continued resuscitation at 10 minutes after birth or 10-minute Apgar score less than 6) or those with severe birth acidosis (defined as any occurrence of: pH =\<7.00 or Base deficit >=16mmol/l in any cord or baby gas sample within 60 minutes of birth) and admitted to the neonatal unit will started on aEEG or EEG as a part of standard clinical care.

Neonatal doctors or advanced nurse practitioners (clinical team) will screen for eligibility using a structured neurological examination performed between 1 to 6 hours after birth.

Once parental consent is obtained, babies will be randomised to whole-body hypothermia or targeted normothermia within 6 hours of birth, using a web-based program. Initial assessment and randomisation (and initiation of whole-body hypothermia or targeted normothermia) will occur at the hospital of birth. The babies in both arms, who are born at a non-cooling centre (LNU or SCBU) will be then transferred to the nearest cooling centre (NICU) within 8 hours of birth for continued care.

Whole-body hypothermia (33.5±0.5°C) will be initiated within 6 hours of birth and continued for 72 hours using a servo-controlled cooling machine at the nearest available neonatal intensive care unit (cooling centre). Passive cooling methods will not be allowed. Whole-body hypothermia to 33.5±0.5°C for 72 hours is the duration and depth of cooling that is standard for babies with moderate or severe HIE in high income countries. To administer this intervention babies will be kept on a cooling mattress or blanket circulating a coolant/water, a rectal temperature probe will be inserted, and overhead radiant warmers will be switched off. The cooling device will be set to hypothermia mode and body temperature will be rapidly reduced to 33.5°C from 37.0°C and maintained within the target range of 33°C to 34°C.

In the Normothermia (Control group), the rectal temperature will be maintained at 37.0±0.5°C for the first 88 hours and any hyperthermia will be treated with a standardised protocol. Four hourly axillary temperature will be recorded during the first 88 hours. Babies in the control group who develop seizures (level 1 or level 2) and progress to moderate HIE between 6 to 24 hours may be treated with whole-body cooling for 72 hours as clinical care, although this is expected to occur in less than 5%.

Conventional MRI using standard 3D T1-weighted and 2D T2-weighted sequences and diffusion weighted imaging will be performed prior to discharge home.

The follow-up assessment will be done when the recruited babies are 24 (±2) months of age. The assessment will be carried out using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development IV. It is a validated and standardized scoring system that assesses development in three domains, that is cognition, language, and motor development. In addition, all infants will have a detailed neurological examination, including Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) for cerebral palsy, vision, and hearing assessment. Babies who die (the mortality rate is expected to be less than 1% in mild HIE) or who cannot be assessed with the Bayley-IV due to severe disability will be allocated a Cognitive Scale Composite score one point below the basal test score (i.e., score of 54). In all infants, PARCA-R (online or face to face) will be completed by the parents immediately prior to the Bayley IV assessments and CBCL (face to face only) after the Bayley IV assessments.

The data will be collected into a paper case report form (CRF) initially and then entered into electronic database at the participating sites. Data will include ante-natal, birth, and neonatal clinical information including gestational age, birth weight, gender, Apgar scores, birth history, delivery room resuscitation to assess the baseline comparability of the groups, core body temperature for assessment of intervention, details of the hospital course, laboratory investigations and MR imaging for safety monitoring, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24 (±2) months of age for primary outcome evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neonatal Encephalopathy
  • Newborn Asphyxia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • therapeutic hypothermia
03

In context

Asphyxia Neonatorum

106 studies on the registry are indexed under Asphyxia Neonatorum; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 426 is above the median of 173 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Asphyxia Neonatorum.

Browse Asphyxia Neonatorum studies →

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London is the lead sponsor of 843 studies on the registry; 180 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Hour to 6 Hours
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All babies born at or after 36 weeks of gestation with a birth weight of 1800g or more with birth acidosis or requiring resuscitation at birth will be screened for eligibility.

Parents will be approached for consent if the baby meets all the three (A + B + C) criteria below:

A. Evidence of intra-partum hypoxia-ischemia defined as any of - (i) Apgar score of \<6 at 10 minutes after birth; (ii) continued need for resuscitation, including endotracheal or mask ventilation, at 10 minutes after birth; (iii) severe birth acidosis defined as any occurrence of pH =\<7.00 or a Base deficit >=16mmol/l in any cord or baby gas sample within 60 minutes of birth.

B. Evidence of mild hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy defined as - two or more abnormal findings in any of the six categories of the modified Sarnat examination (level of consciousness, spontaneous activity, posture, tone, primitive reflexes, and autonomic nervous system) but not meeting the diagnosis of moderate or severe hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy on a standardised examination performed by a certified examiner between 1 to 6 hours of age.

C. Normal amplitude on aEEG performed for at least 30 minutes between 1 to 6 hours of age. Normal amplitude will be defined as upper margin of the aEEG activity more than 10 microvolts and the lower margin more than 5 microvolts on a single channel aEEG.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants who meet the BAPM criteria for whole-body hypothermia
  • Infants without encephalopathy defined as less than two abnormalities on structured neurological examination.
  • Infants with major congenital or chromosomal anomalies identified prior to randomisation.
  • Infants with birthweight \<1800g.
  • Infants who have already received sedation, muscle relaxation, or anti-convulsants prior to neurological assessment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
426 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Whole body hypothermia

    Whole-body hypothermia (33.5±0.5°C) will be initiated within 6 hours of birth and continued for 72 hours using a servo-controlled cooling machine at the nearest available neonatal intensive care unit (cooling centre).

    Procedure: Whole body hypothermia · Other: Supportive neonatal intensive care · Diagnostic Test: Follow up assessment at 2 years of age

  • Active comparator
    Normothermia

    The axillary temperature will be maintained at 37±0.5°C using servo-controlled incubators for the first 80 hours and any hyperthermia will be treated with a standardised protocol.

    Procedure: Targeted normothermia · Other: Supportive neonatal intensive care · Diagnostic Test: Follow up assessment at 2 years of age

Interventions

  • ProcedureWhole body hypothermia

    Whole-body hypothermia (33.5±0.5°C) initiated within 6 hours of birth and continued for 72 hours. The rectal temperature will be maintained at 33.5±0.5°C using a servo-controlled cooling machine.

  • ProcedureTargeted normothermia

    The axillary temperature will be maintained at 37±0.5°C for the first 80 hours and any hyperthermia will be treated with a standardised protocol.

  • OtherSupportive neonatal intensive care

    Neonatal intensive care monitoring and support including ventilatory and inotropic support as clinically indicated

  • Diagnostic testFollow up assessment at 2 years of age

    The assessment will be carried out using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development IV. In addition, all infants will have a detailed neurological examination, including Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) for cerebral palsy, vision, and hearing assessment. Babies who die or who cannot be assessed with the Bayley-IV due to severe disability will be allocated a Cognitive Scale Composite score one point below the basal test score. PARCA-R will be completed by the parents immediately.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Cognitive Composite Scale score from the Bayley IV examination

    The Bayley scales of Infant and toddler development IV is a validated and standardised scoring system that assesses development of three domains, that is cognition, language, and motor development. Babies who die or who cannot be assessed with the Bayley IV due to severe disability will be allocated a Cognitive Scale Composite score one point below the basal test score similar to the previous whole-body hypothermia trials.

    Time frame: 22 to 26 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neonatal seizures

    Definite seizures: seizures confirmed on EEG with or without clinical manifestations or Level 2-Probable seizure: clinically assessed focal clonic/ focal tonic seizure or seizures confirmed on aEEG.

    Time frame: During neonatal hospitalisation (Expected average of 2 weeks)

  2. Duration of intensive care.

    Number of days of neonatal intensive care.

    Time frame: During neonatal hospitalisation (Expected average of 2 weeks)

  3. Duration of hospital stay.

    Total number of days of inpatient care in a neonatal unit.

    Time frame: During neonatal hospitalisation (Expected average of 2 weeks).

  4. Duration of mechanical ventilation.

    Number of hours on invasive ventilation through an endotracheal tube.

    Time frame: During neonatal hospitalisation (Expected average of 2 weeks).

  5. Duration of inotropic support.

    Total number of hours on inotropic support.

    Time frame: During neonatal hospitalisation (Expected average of 2 weeks).

  6. Number of babies with bloodstream or cerebrospinal fluid positive infection.

    Isolation of a pathogenic organism from blood or cerebrospinal fluid along with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis, at any time during neonatal hospitalisation.

    Time frame: During neonatal hospitalisation (Expected average of 2 weeks).

  7. Number of babies with thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy requiring transfusion of blood products.

    Prolonged blood coagulation requiring blood products

    Time frame: During neonatal hospitalisation (Expected average of 2 weeks).

  8. Opioid use.

    Total cumulative dose of morphine per kilogram of body weight.

    Time frame: During neonatal hospitalisation (Expected average of 2 weeks).

  9. Number of babies exclusively breastfeeding at hospital discharge.

    Defined as the newborn receiving only breast milk the last feedings before discharge.

    Time frame: During neonatal hospitalisation (Expected average of 2 weeks).

  10. Brain injury scores on conventional magnetic resonance imaging

    Defined as per Rutherford/NICHD staging.

    Time frame: During neonatal hospitalisation (Expected average of 2 weeks).

  11. Survival without any neurological impairment.

    Score of \>85 in all Bayley-IV domains (motor, language, and cognitive), normal neurological examination with no cerebral palsy (Gross motor function classification system score \<1), no hearing or visual impairment (as reported by parents), and no seizure disorder.

    Time frame: 22 to 26 months

  12. Preschool Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL 1½-5)

    Completed by parents at the 24-month assessment to provide a standardised measure of children's behavioural outcomes on scales that assess internalizing and externalizing behaviour problems and a Total Problems Scale. Mean standardised T-scores on each scale will be compared between groups. The CBCL checklist will be completed after the Bayley IV assessments.

    Time frame: 22 to 26 months

07

Study locations

39 of 39 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Montaldo P, Cirillo M, Burgod C, Caredda E, Ascione S, Carpentieri M, Puzone S, D'Amico A, Garegrat R, Lanza M, Moreno Morales M, Atreja G, Shivamurthappa V, Kariholu U, Aladangady N, Fleming P, Mathews A, Palanisami B, Windrow J, Harvey K, Soe A, Pattnayak S, Sashikumar P, Harigopal S, Pressler R, Wilson M, De Vita E, Shankaran S, Thayyil S; COMET Trial Group. Whole-Body Hypothermia vs Targeted Normothermia for Neonates With Mild Encephalopathy: A Multicenter Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e249119. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9119. PubMed 38709535 ↗
  • Garegrat R, Montaldo P, Burgod C, Pant S, Mazlan M, Palanisami B, Chakkarapani E, Woolfall K, Johnson S, Grant PE, Land S, Mahmoud M, Brady T, Cornelius V, Adams E, Dorling J, Aladangadi N, Fleming P, Pressler R, Shennan A, Petrou S, Soe A, Basset P, Shankaran S, Thayyil S. Whole-body hypothermia in mild neonatal encephalopathy: protocol for a multicentre phase III randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2024 Jul 18;24(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04935-4. PubMed 39026197 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2030, 69 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 12, 2023
First posted
Jun 5, 2023
StartActual
Mar 15, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2030
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2030
Last update
Feb 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05889507
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2023
Start date
Mar 15, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 6, 2026

Study contacts

Sudhin Thayyil, MD, PhD
Contact
s.thayyil@imperial.ac.uk
02033132473
Reema Garegrat, MD, DNB, MRCPCH
Contact
r.garegrat@imperial.ac.uk
02033132473
Sudhin Thayyil, PhD
principal investigator · Imperial College London
Seetha Shankaran, MD
principal investigator · Wayne State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion