ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05885035Updated Jul 17, 2023

Effects of Calcium Hydroxylapatite on Cellulite Dimples in the Buttocks

A Phase 1 interventional study of Calcium Hydroxyapatite in Cellulite, sponsored by Kalpna Kay Durairaj, MD, FACS. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-17.

Sponsored by Kalpna Kay Durairaj, MD, FACS · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jun 2023, 3 years 4 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered May 2023).
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the efficacy of Calcium Hydroxylapatite (CaHA) in treating cellulite dimples in the buttocks. Participants will:

  • have 3 treatment sessions at weeks 0, 4, and 8 and a final live assessment visit at week 14
  • receive approximately 2 syringes per side of the buttocks, per treatment session
  • have their pictures taken before and after each treatment session, and once more during the final visit
Read the detailed description

Twenty-five (25) subjects will be enrolled in the study. The patient's body fat composition will be measured by a digital full body composition scale, which will be used to determine the individual percent body fat and eligibility.

The subjects will have three treatment sessions at weeks 0, 4, and 8 and a final live assessment visit at week 14. Office visits will last for approximately two hours. All subjects will have photographs taken before and after each treatment session. Photographs will be taken with buttocks in a relaxed and flexed state. All pictures will be taken via the Quantificare Liveviz Infinity Pro and will be stored via a HIPAA-compliant server.

Subjects will be treated with subdermal injections of CaHA diluted 1:1 with normal saline solution and 1% Lidocaine after having their pictures taken. Subjects will be asked to lay in the prone position with exposed buttocks. Topical Lidocaine/Tetracaine 23%/7% ointment cream will be applied to the treatment sites. After 15 minutes of numbing, the topical anesthetic will be cleaned off with alcohol. Thereafter, subjects will be asked to stand in an upright position to easily mark the areas with cellulite dimpling. The subjects will also be asked to flex and relax their buttocks to let the physician assess the areas of dimpling. Subjects will go back to laying in prone position to receive subdermal injections of CaHA. Multiple, retrograde, linear injections using a standard 25G cannula will be performed with a threading technique by the treating physician. Post injection, a calming cream will be applied to the treated area while massaging in a circular motion for five minutes. Subjects will be called 24-48 hours after each treatment session to check up on comfort and answer questions.

The treating physician will rate each subject's cellulite dimples using the Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS) at each visit. The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) will be used by the treating physician and subjects to rate aesthetic improvement at each visit after baseline. Subjects will also rate their overall aesthetic improvement and treatment satisfaction at each visit after baseline according to a 5-point scale: (1) Extremely dissatisfied, (2) Dissatisfied, (3) Slightly satisfied, (4) Satisfied, (5) Extremely satisfied. Before and after photos of treated patients will be independently evaluated by the blinded, secondary physician using the CSS scale at each time interval of photos taken.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cellulite

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Buttocks
  • Calcium hydroxylapatite
  • Hyperdilution
  • Hyperdiluted calcium hydroxylapatite
  • Minimally invasive
  • Gluteal augmentation
03

In context

Cellulite

71 studies on the registry are indexed under Cellulite; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 34 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Cellulite.

Browse Cellulite studies →

Lead sponsor

Kalpna Kay Durairaj, MD, FACS is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Females, 21-50 years old, of any race and ethnic background.
  • 4-5 cellulite dimples that are no deeper than 1 cm each per buttock.
  • Body fat between 9% and 55%.
  • Written Authorization for Use and Release of Health and Research Study Information has been obtained.
  • Ability to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Males
  • Females who are pregnant, breastfeeding, chronically using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, have conditions or have a known allergy to the study medications.
  • Subjects with piercings or tattoos on the buttocks or those prone to getting keloids.
  • Subjects with any aesthetic treatment in the buttocks.
  • Subjects with minimal or excessive subcutaneous fat.
  • Scars or ongoing infections in the target areas.
  • Presence of any bleeding disorder or is receiving medication that may increase the risk of bleeding as the result of treatment.
  • Subject has a condition or is in a situation which, in the Investigator's opinion, may put the subject at significant risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study.
  • Any medical condition that would interfere with assessment of safety or efficacy or compromise the subject's ability to undergo study procedures or give .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treated with hyperdilute Calcium Hydroxylapatite (CaHA)

    Subjects will have 3 treatment sessions at weeks 0, 4, and 8 and a final live assessment visit at week 14. Approximately two syringes of CaHA will be injected per side of the buttocks (at sites with cellulite dimpling) during each of the three treatment sessions.

    Drug: Calcium Hydroxyapatite

Interventions

  • Each syringe of CaHA contains 1.5 cc of product, and it will be diluted 1:1 with 1.0 cc of normal saline solution and 0.5 cc of 1% Lidocaine with a ratio of 1:100,000 epinephrine in the target sites.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Rating

    The treating physician will rate the subject after the final treatment. Based on aesthetic appearance, qualitative success of treatment will be evaluated using the GAIS. Aesthetic appearance will be rated one of the five following options: * Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition * No Change: The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition * Improved: Obvious improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but a touchup or re-treatment is indicated * Much Improved: Marked improvement in appearance but not completely optimal for this patient. A touchup would slightly improve the result * Very Much Improved: Optimal cosmetic result for the treatment in this patient

    Time frame: Up to 14 weeks

  2. Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS) Rating

    The treating physician and the blinded, secondary physician will rate the subject after the final treatment. The scale identifies 5 key clinical morphologic features of cellulite: (1) number of evident depressions, (2) depth of depressions, (3) morphologic appearance of skin surface alterations, (4) grade of laxity, flaccidity, or sagging skin, and (5) the classification scale originally described by Nurnberger and Muller. The scale has 4 points to describe each feature of cellulite: Stage 0 is no dimpling in relaxed or contracted states, Stage 1 implies no dimpling upon relaxed states but dimpling during muscle contraction or skin pinching, Stage 2 implies dimpling appears spontaneously when standing but not when lying down, and Stage 3 implies dimpling is spontaneously present when both standing and lying down and is evident to the naked eye.

    Time frame: Up to 14 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Rating

    Based on aesthetic appearance, qualitative success of treatment will be evaluated by the treating physician using the GAIS. Aesthetic appearance will be rated one of the five following options: * Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition * No Change: The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition * Improved: Obvious improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but a touchup or re-treatment is indicated * Much Improved: Marked improvement in appearance but not completely optimal for this patient. A touchup would slightly improve the result * Very Much Improved: Optimal cosmetic result for the treatment in this patient

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  2. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Rating

    Based on aesthetic appearance, qualitative success of treatment will be self-evaluated by subjects using the GAIS. Aesthetic appearance will be rated one of the five following options: * Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition * No Change: The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition * Improved: Obvious improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but a touchup or re-treatment is indicated * Much Improved: Marked improvement in appearance but not completely optimal for this patient. A touchup would slightly improve the result * Very Much Improved: Optimal cosmetic result for the treatment in this patient

    Time frame: Up to 14 weeks

  3. Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS) Rating

    The treating physician and the blinded, secondary physician will rate the subject at each treatment visit using the CSS Rating. The scale identifies 5 key clinical morphologic features of cellulite: (1) number of evident depressions, (2) depth of depressions, (3) morphologic appearance of skin surface alterations, (4) grade of laxity, flaccidity, or sagging skin, and (5) the classification scale originally described by Nurnberger and Muller. The scale has 4 points to describe each feature of cellulite: Stage 0 is no dimpling in relaxed or contracted states, Stage 1 implies no dimpling upon relaxed states but dimpling during muscle contraction or skin pinching, Stage 2 implies dimpling appears spontaneously when standing but not when lying down, and Stage 3 implies dimpling is spontaneously present when both standing and lying down and is evident to the naked eye.

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks

  4. Patient Satisfaction of Aesthetic Appearance

    Subjects will rate their satisfaction of aesthetic appearance of their buttocks at each treatment and at the final assessment. Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point scale: (1) extremely dissatisfied, (2) dissatisfied, (3) slightly satisfied, (4) satisfied, and (5) extremely satisfied.

    Time frame: Up to 14 weeks

  5. Patient Treatment Satisfaction

    Subjects will rate their satisfaction of the treatment at each treatment visit and at the final assessment. Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point scale: (1) extremely dissatisfied, (2) dissatisfied, (3) slightly satisfied, (4) satisfied, and (5) extremely satisfied.

    Time frame: Up to 14 weeks

  6. Telephone Assessment

    Subjects will be contacted weekly to assess safety injection site and treatment responses. Questionnaire will consist of the 5 following questions: 1. How are you feeling? 2. What (if any) side effects are you experiencing? 3. Are you experiencing pain as a result of treatment? 4. Are you following the post-procedural instructions? 5. Do you have any questions or concerns?

    Time frame: Up to 14 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • K. Kay Durairaj, MD, FACS, A Medical Corporation
    Pasadena, California 91105, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Amore R, Amuso D, Leonardi V, Sbarbati A, Conti G, Albini M, Leva F, Terranova F, Guida A, Gkritzalas K, Gavashely L, Velichenko R. Treatment of Dimpling from Cellulite. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 May 18;6(5):e1771. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001771. eCollection 2018 May. PubMed 29922557 ↗
  • de Almeida AT, Figueredo V, da Cunha ALG, Casabona G, Costa de Faria JR, Alves EV, Sato M, Branco A, Guarnieri C, Palermo E. Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Hyperdiluted Calcium Hydroxyapatite (Radiesse) as a Face and Body Biostimulatory Agent. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Mar 14;7(3):e2160. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002160. eCollection 2019 Mar. PubMed 31044123 ↗
  • Goldie K, Peeters W, Alghoul M, Butterwick K, Casabona G, Chao YYY, Costa J, Eviatar J, Fabi SG, Lupo M, Sattler G, Waldorf H, Yutskovskaya Y, Lorenc P. Global Consensus Guidelines for the Injection of Diluted and Hyperdiluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite for Skin Tightening. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Nov;44 Suppl 1:S32-S41. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001685. Erratum In: Dermatol Surg. 2019 Feb;45(2):327. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001782. PubMed 30358631 ↗
  • Casabona G, Marchese P. Calcium Hydroxylapatite Combined with Microneedling and Ascorbic Acid is Effective for Treating Stretch Marks. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Sep 26;5(9):e1474. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001474. eCollection 2017 Sep. PubMed 29062646 ↗
  • Loghem JV, Yutskovskaya YA, Philip Werschler W. Calcium hydroxylapatite: over a decade of clinical experience. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015 Jan;8(1):38-49. PubMed 25610523 ↗
  • Silvers SL, Eviatar JA, Echavez MI, Pappas AL. Prospective, open-label, 18-month trial of calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) for facial soft-tissue augmentation in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated lipoatrophy: one-year durability. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep;118(3 Suppl):34S-45S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000234847.36020.52. PubMed 16936543 ↗
  • Carruthers A, Liebeskind M, Carruthers J, Forster BB. Radiographic and computed tomographic studies of calcium hydroxylapatite for treatment of HIV-associated facial lipoatrophy and correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2008 Jun;34 Suppl 1:S78-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34247.x. PubMed 18547186 ↗
  • Goldman MP, Moradi A, Gold MH, Friedmann DP, Alizadeh K, Adelglass JM, Katz BE. Calcium Hydroxylapatite Dermal Filler for Treatment of Dorsal Hand Volume Loss: Results From a 12-Month, Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded Trial. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Jan;44(1):75-83. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001203. PubMed 28562435 ↗
  • Breithaupt A, Fitzgerald R. Collagen Stimulators: Poly-L-Lactic Acid and Calcium Hydroxyl Apatite. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;23(4):459-69. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2015.07.007. PubMed 26505542 ↗
  • Lorenc ZP, Black JM, Cheung JS, Chiu A, Del Campo R, Durkin AJ, Graivier M, Green JB, Kwok GP, Marcus K, Rammos CB, Werschler WP. Skin Tightening With Hyperdilute CaHA: Dilution Practices and Practical Guidance for Clinical Practice. Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Jan 1;42(1):NP29-NP37. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab269. PubMed 34192299 ↗
  • Emer J, Sundaram H. Aesthetic applications of calcium hydroxylapatite volumizing filler: an evidence-based review and discussion of current concepts: (part 1 of 2). J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Dec;12(12):1345-54. PubMed 24301235 ↗
  • Cogorno Wasylkowski V. Body vectoring technique with Radiesse((R)) for tightening of the abdomen, thighs, and brachial zone. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 May 19;8:267-73. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S75631. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26056483 ↗
  • Chao YY, Kim JW, Kim J, Ko H, Goldie K. Hyperdilution of CaHA fillers for the improvement of age and hereditary volume deficits in East Asian patients. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2018 Jul 16;11:357-363. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S159752. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30038511 ↗
  • Jacovella PF. Calcium hydroxylapatite facial filler (Radiesse): indications, technique, and results. Clin Plast Surg. 2006 Oct;33(4):511-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2006.08.002. PubMed 17085220 ↗
  • Bass LS, Smith S, Busso M, McClaren M. Calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) for treatment of nasolabial folds: long-term safety and efficacy results. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Mar;30(2):235-8. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10366549. PubMed 20442101 ↗
  • Kadouch JA. Calcium hydroxylapatite: A review on safety and complications. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Jun;16(2):152-161. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12326. Epub 2017 Mar 1. PubMed 28247924 ↗
  • Fabi SG, Alhaddad M, Boen M, Goldman M. Prospective Clinical Trial Evaluating the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Calcium Hydroxylapatite for Chest Rejuvenation. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021 May 1;20(5):534-537. doi: 10.36849/JDD.5680. PubMed 33938688 ↗
  • Marmur ES, Phelps R, Goldberg DJ. Clinical, histologic and electron microscopic findings after injection of a calcium hydroxylapatite filler. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2004 Dec;6(4):223-6. doi: 10.1080/147641704100003048. PubMed 16020207 ↗
  • Gonzalez N, Goldberg DJ. Evaluating the Effects of Injected Calcium Hydroxylapatite on Changes in Human Skin Elastin and Proteoglycan Formation. Dermatol Surg. 2019 Apr;45(4):547-551. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001809. PubMed 30893178 ↗
  • Lapatina NG, Pavlenko T. Diluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite for Skin Tightening of the Upper Arms and Abdomen. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Sep 1;16(9):900-906. PubMed 28915285 ↗
  • Lizzul PF, Narurkar VA. The role of calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) in nonsurgical aesthetic rejuvenation. J Drugs Dermatol. 2010 May;9(5):446-50. PubMed 20480786 ↗
  • Yutskovskaya YA, Kogan EA. Improved Neocollagenesis and Skin Mechanical Properties After Injection of Diluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite in the Neck and Decolletage:A Pilot Study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Jan 1;16(1):68-74. PubMed 28095536 ↗
  • Oranges CM, di Summa PG, Giordano S, Kalbermatten DF, Schaefer DJ. A Changing Paradigm: The Brazilian Butt Lift Is Neither Brazilian Nor a Lift-Why It Needs to Be Called Safe Subcutaneous Buttock Augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Oct;146(4):502e-503e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007200. No abstract available. PubMed 32639431 ↗
  • Casabona G, Pereira G. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization and Calcium Hydroxylapatite for Improving Skin Laxity and Cellulite Appearance. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jul 25;5(7):e1388. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001388. eCollection 2017 Jul. PubMed 28831339 ↗
  • Hexsel DM, Dal'forno T, Hexsel CL. A validated photonumeric cellulite severity scale. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 May;23(5):523-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03101.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13. PubMed 19220646 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers with interest in calcium hydroxyapatite and cellulite dimpling. Individual participant data that underlies the results reported in this article will be shared after identification. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements (e.g., a material transfer agreement) are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party. Furthermore, the proposed use of trial IPD must be approved with an Independent Review Committee prior to any data sharing.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Data will become available beginning 12 months and ending 28 months after article publication. Upon approval of a data sharing request, data will be accessible to researchers for up to 3 months.

Access criteria: Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information or to submit a request, please contact research@beautybydrkay.com.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2023 to primary completion in Jun 2023, 5 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 22, 2023
First posted
Jun 1, 2023
StartActual
Jan 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Jun 26, 2023
CompletionActual
Jun 26, 2023
Last update
Jul 17, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05885035
Lead sponsor
Kalpna Kay Durairaj, MD, FACS
Responsible party
Kalpna Kay Durairaj, MD, FACS (Principal Investigator, K. Kay Durairaj, MD, FACS, A Medical Corporation) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 1, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2023
Completion
Jun 26, 2023
Last update
Jul 17, 2023

Study contacts

Kalpna K Durairaj, MD
principal investigator · K. Kay Durairaj, MD, FACS, A Medical Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Durapatite

Start the discussion