An observational study in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, sponsored by Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 69 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-15.
Sponsored by Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China · Observational
All participants will be tested for EBV-related biomarkers, including EBNA1-IgA, VCA-IgA, and BNLF2b total antibody (P85-Ab), and participants with high serologic risk will be selected based on serologic test results, and dual-energy CT will be performed first for high-risk screening subjects, and dual-energy CT will be performed first for the high-risk group to record dual-energy CT examinations of those suspected of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and then endoscopy was performed on the high-risk group to record those suspected of nasopharyngeal carcinoma under endoscopy, and finally biopsies were taken for positive lesion sites indicated by dual-energy CT and suspicious lesion sites found by endoscopy to clarify the diagnosis.
30-69 years old healthy residences in Zhongshan City
Exclusion Criteria:
30-69 years old healthy participants in Zhongshan
Procedure: participants will undergo dual-energy CT and endoscopy
Diagnostic Test: P85-Ab,EBNA1-IgA,and VCA-IgA. Detect P85-Ab, EBNA1-IgA, VCA-IgA for all participants and select serological high-risk participants DiagnosticTest: dual-energy CT, endoscopy and biopsy. serological high-risk participants will refer to dual-energy CT, endoscopy and biospy
Also known as: Biological/Vaccine: Blood and saliva Collect blood and saliva samples from participants
Sensitivity and specificity of dual-energy CT and endoscopy in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
To compare the sensitivity \[actual number of nasopharyngeal cancers in the population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy / (actual number of nasopharyngeal cancers in the population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy + number of nasopharyngeal cancers in the non-nasopharyngeal cancer population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy)\] and specificity \[actual number of non-nasopharyngeal cancers in the population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy / ( actual number of non-nasopharyngeal cancers in the population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy + number of non-nasopharyngeal cancers in the nasopharyngeal cancer population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy)\] of dual-energy CT and endoscopy in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and to determine which test is more accurate in detecting nasopharyngeal carcinoma from the population
Time frame: 6 months
Positive and negative predictive values of dual-energy CT and endoscopy in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
To compare the positive predictive value \[actual number of nasopharyngeal cancers in the population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy / (actual number of nasopharyngeal cancers in the population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy + number of non-nasopharyngeal cancers in the nasopharyngeal cancer population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy )\] and negative predictive value \[actual number of non-nasopharyngeal cancers in the population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy / (actual number of non-nasopharyngeal cancers in the population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy + number of nasopharyngeal cancers in the non-nasopharyngeal cancer population considered by dual-energy CT or endoscopy)\] of dual-energy CT and endoscopy in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China