ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05880953Updated Jul 21, 2026Results posted

Parent-to-parent Coaching While Awaiting Hospital Discharge With a Child With a Ventilator

An interventional study of Parent-to-parent coaching in Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, Children With Medical Complexity and Home Nursing, sponsored by University of Chicago. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-21.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study is to pilot a parent-to-parent coaching model with experienced family members of children with Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV) as parent coaches.

Read the detailed description

The objective of the study is to pilot a parent-to-parent coaching model with experienced family members of children with IMV as parent coaches. Parent coaches will advise parents of children with IMV awaiting hospital discharge on strategies for advocating for home nursing. Parents and parent coaches will meet as needed and engagement will be tailored to parent preference: text messaging, video or phone conferencing, or in-person visiting in the family home or hospital. Points of contact, issues addressed, and time required will be collected as needs assessment data to appropriately size and scale a future intervention. Enrollment and exit assessments will include completion of the Family Empowerment Scale (FES) and a brief structured interview about parents' perceived impact and acceptability, which will provide pilot data to inform a future intervention. The investigator hypothesizes that parents will gain self-advocacy skills specific to recruiting home health nurses and improve the size of their home nursing workforce through this coaching model.

02

Conditions studied

  • Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
  • Children With Medical Complexity
  • Home Nursing
  • Empowerment

Browse trials for

03

In context

Empowerment

154 studies on the registry are indexed under Empowerment; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 141 across 132 interventional studies indexed under Empowerment.

Browse Empowerment studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 924 studies on the registry; 185 are open to participants now.

Of its 103 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parents of children with a tracheostomy and ventilator awaiting hospital discharge in Illinois.
  • Parents must live or have their child hospitalized within approximately a 1 hour radius of the University of Chicago.
  • The child must be enrolled in, or in the process of enrolling in the Division of Specialized Care for Children (DSCC) Home Care Program.
  • The parent/legal guardian must have legal custody of the child and plan on living with the child in the home.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Wards of the state
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Parent Coaching

    Participants will be involved for about 6 months or until they feel that they no longer need the parent-to-parent support. Parents will participate in the following contact attempts: * Introductions and rapport building which will include a demographic survey with a needs assessment, and the Family Empowerment Scale (FES) * A series of coaching points which may include some or all of the following topics * Interviewing and selecting a home health agency * Expectation setting for home based nursing care * Tips for finding home health professionals from inpatient nursing * Tips for using personal and professional care networks to find and recruit home health team members * An exit interview assessment including the FES and components of the demographic survey that may have changed

    Behavioral: Parent-to-parent coaching

Interventions

  • BehavioralParent-to-parent coaching

    Parents and parent coaches will meet as needed via the family's preferred method. Engagement may include text messaging, phone conferencing, Zoom conferencing, or occasional in-home or hospital visiting as preferred. Coaching sessions will vary based on family desired frequency and location, but may include: on-site in the family home or hospital room, telephone or video conferencing, or asynchronous contacts via email or text messaging. The template for the intervention includes an initial introductory session which is intended to build rapport and orient the parent to our program. Subsequent session topics may include: addressing specific needs including topics of interviewing and selecting home health agencies, expectation setting for home based nursing care, recruiting for home health team from inpatient settings, and recruiting for home health team from professional and personal networks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Parent Empowerment as Measured by the Family Empowerment Scale (FES)

    Parents completed the Family Empowerment Scale (FES), a 34-item Likert-scale questionnaire with three domains: family, service system, and community. Scores on the FES range from 1 (not true at all) to 5 (very true), with higher scores indicating greater self-perceived advocacy skills, confidence in navigating systems and community resources, and ability to engage in decision making for their child. The FES has been tested for reliability (0.87-0.88) and internal consistency for test-test reliability (0.77-0.85). The FES had been used previously to characterize changes in empowerment after an advocacy intervention for parents of children with disabilities. The maximum potential total score being 170 and the minimum being 34. We compared scores between enrollment and exit and report the median(IQR) change in score over the study period.

    Time frame: Baseline and repeated at exit (length of program involvement was median (range) 6 (2-8) months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants That Completed Nursing Agency Selection

    Parents will have selected a nursing agency for the home health nursing care of their child.

    Time frame: At study exit (length of program involvement was a median (range) 6 (2-8) months)

  2. Categorical Rating of Met Nursing Needs

    Participants were asked to rate their perception of met nursing needs (Not staffed, somewhat staffed, mostly staffed, or fully staffed).

    Time frame: At study exit (length of program involvement was a median (range) 6 (2-8) months)

  3. Days Per Week Where at Least One Home Health Nursing Shift Was Filled

    At exit from the study participants were asked how many days per week they have a filled nursing shift. We counted each day with at least one nursing shift filled as a day with home health nursing.

    Time frame: At study exit (length of program involvement was a median (range) 6 (2-8) months)

  4. Satisfaction With Coaching Program

    Parents will complete a structured interview about their experience with the parent to parent coaching program and likelihood of recommending it to a family in a similar circumstance.

    Time frame: At study exit (length of program involvement was median (range) 6 (2-8) months)

07

Results

Posted Jul 21, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Findings from this small pilot study should be interpreted cautiously. Broad conclusions to larger populations are limited by our small sample size within a single geographic region. Additionally, we intentionally targeted families identified as hard to staff with nursing care, many of whom were already receiving maximal support from hospital and community-based programs.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited for this pilot intervention through the Division of Specialized Care for Children (DSCC), the state of Illinois Title V agency which provides care coordination for children with medical complexity. DSCC staff introduced the coaching program to parents of children with IMV highlighted as hard-to-staff cases awaiting hospital discharge or those living at home with incomplete home nursing. The study team contacted interested parents for consent and enrollment.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneParent Coaching
Started10
Completed9
Not completed1

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Parent Empowerment as Measured by the Family Empowerment Scale (FES)

Parents completed the Family Empowerment Scale (FES), a 34-item Likert-scale questionnaire with three domains: family, service system, and community. Scores on the FES range from 1 (not true at all) to 5 (very true), with higher scores indicating greater self-perceived advocacy skills, confidence in navigating systems and community resources, and ability to engage in decision making for their child. The FES has been tested for reliability (0.87-0.88) and internal consistency for test-test reliability (0.77-0.85). The FES had been used previously to characterize changes in empowerment after an advocacy intervention for parents of children with disabilities. The maximum potential total score being 170 and the minimum being 34. We compared scores between enrollment and exit and report the median(IQR) change in score over the study period.

Time frame:
Baseline and repeated at exit (length of program involvement was median (range) 6 (2-8) months)
Reported as:
Median · Family Empowerment Scale Score
Change in Parent Empowerment as Measured by the Family Empowerment Scale (FES)
Family Empowerment Scale ScoreParent Coaching
Change in Parent Empowerment as Measured by the Family Empowerment Scale (FES)5.2 (2.2 to 13.3)
SecondaryNumber of Participants That Completed Nursing Agency Selection

Parents will have selected a nursing agency for the home health nursing care of their child.

Time frame:
At study exit (length of program involvement was a median (range) 6 (2-8) months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Completed Nursing Agency Selection
ParticipantsParent Coaching
Number of Participants That Completed Nursing Agency Selection8
SecondaryCategorical Rating of Met Nursing Needs

Participants were asked to rate their perception of met nursing needs (Not staffed, somewhat staffed, mostly staffed, or fully staffed).

Time frame:
At study exit (length of program involvement was a median (range) 6 (2-8) months)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Categorical Rating of Met Nursing Needs
participantsParent Coaching
Not Staffed1
Somewhat staffed3
Mostly/fully staffed5
SecondaryDays Per Week Where at Least One Home Health Nursing Shift Was Filled

At exit from the study participants were asked how many days per week they have a filled nursing shift. We counted each day with at least one nursing shift filled as a day with home health nursing.

Time frame:
At study exit (length of program involvement was a median (range) 6 (2-8) months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Days Per Week Where at Least One Home Health Nursing Shift Was Filled
ParticipantsParent Coaching
0 days of home health nursing1
1-4 days of home health nursing0
5 days of home health nursing4
6 days of home health nursing2
7 days of home health nursing2
SecondarySatisfaction With Coaching Program

Parents will complete a structured interview about their experience with the parent to parent coaching program and likelihood of recommending it to a family in a similar circumstance.

Time frame:
At study exit (length of program involvement was median (range) 6 (2-8) months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Satisfaction With Coaching Program
ParticipantsParent Coaching
Satisfaction With Coaching Program9

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment to exit (length of program involvement was median(range) of 6 (2-8) months). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Parent Coaching0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

10 parents were enrolled in the program.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Parent Coaching
<=18 years—
Between 18 and 65 years—
>=65 years—
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Parent Coaching
Female10
Male0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Parent Coaching
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American6
White4
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Parent Coaching
Hispanic or Latino4
Not Hispanic or Latino6
Unknown or Not Reported0
Family Empowerment Scale Score
Family Empowerment Scale Score(Family Empowerment Scale Score)Parent Coaching
Median142 (136 to 154)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No Individual Participant Data(IPD) will be shared.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2023 to primary completion in May 2025, 22 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2026, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

Of 82 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Empowerment, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 45. This study's 22 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 82 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 11, 2023
First posted
May 30, 2023
StartActual
Jun 12, 2023
Primary completionActual
May 9, 2025
CompletionActual
May 9, 2025
Results first posted
Jul 21, 2026
Last update
Jul 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05880953
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 30, 2023
Start date
Jun 12, 2023
Primary completion
May 9, 2025
Completion
May 9, 2025
Results posted
Jul 21, 2026
Last update
Jul 21, 2026

Study contacts

Sarah Sobotka, MD, MSCP
principal investigator · University of Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion