ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05879679MetaBouUpdated Jun 20, 2024

Pilot Study on the Validity of the Metacognitive Hub Model of Craving in Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorders (BED)

An observational study in Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-Eating Disorder, sponsored by Laval University. Recruiting at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-20.

Sponsored by Laval University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Craving is defined as an irrepressible urge to consume certain products and represents one of the key factors in severe substance use disorders, as illustrated by its recent inclusion as a diagnostic criterion in the most recent fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 5). However, the pathophysiological models of craving remain debated.

The "metacognitive hub model", a conceptual, experimental and clinical approach to craving, proposes that craving should be considered as the embedded consequence of the interaction between three components (the reflexive, automatic and interoceptive systems), each of which has an implicit and explicit element. This model links the three components by suggesting that metacognitive abilities, the ability to understand one's own cognitive functioning, may be a skill of individuals that allows them to make the three sub-components explicit or not.

To date, the conception of eating disorders is increasingly similar to that of addictive disorders. Indeed, there is growing evidence that the symptomatology of bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder can be considered in part as an "food addiction" and would fit the diagnostic criteria of an addictive disorder. Bulimia nervosa is an eating disorder (DSM 5) characterized by a cycle of binge eating and compensatory behaviors such as self-induced vomiting that tend to negate or compensate for the effects of the binge eating. Binge eating disorder (DSM 5) is characterized by a cycle of binge eating, but without the compensatory behaviors seen in bulimia nervosa. In addition, there are common neurological aspects as well as similar cognitions between these eating disorders and addictive disorders. Given the importance of craving in addictive pathology, it seems essential to address this issue in bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. The cognitive difficulties of patients with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder, which are close to the difficulties observed in patients with addictive behaviors, suggest that the "metacognitive hub model" could provide a clear and measurable theoretical framework of the different dimensions of craving.

The overall objective of this project is to explore the relationship between the level of craving induced by food picture exposure and the level of impairment of the reflexive, automatic, interoceptive, and metacognitive systems in women with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder and to compare these impairments according to the nature of the eating disorder (i.e., binge eating versus bulimia nervosa).

Our hypotheses are:

  1. the induction of food craving will affect the reflexive, automatic, and interoceptive systems of patients with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder.
  2. the magnitude of the effect of food craving induction on implicit craving and explicit craving will be modulated by the participants' metacognitive abilities.
02

Conditions studied

  • Bulimia Nervosa
  • Binge-Eating Disorder

Keywords

  • craving
  • addiction
  • metacognition
  • neurocognition
03

In context

Bulimia Nervosa

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Bulimia Nervosa; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 100 across 47 observational studies indexed under Bulimia Nervosa.

Browse Bulimia Nervosa studies →

Lead sponsor

Laval University is the lead sponsor of 380 studies on the registry; 67 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants consulted by specialized psychiatrist at IUCPQ Participants who have already participated in a research project and have agreed to be contacted for other projects Participants recruited via the ANEB and Maison l'Éclaircie mailing lists and via an ad on social networks.

Participants receiving care at the CEPIA or on the CEPIA waiting list.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • have been medically diagnosed with binge eating disorder or bulimia nervosa
  • fluent in french
  • able to consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • co-morbid substance use disorder,
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Binge Eating Disorder

    Participants with a binge eating disorder (DSM-5 criteria)

    Behavioral: Food craving induction

  • Bulimia Nervosa

    Participants with a bulimia nervosa (DSM-5 criteria)

    Behavioral: Food craving induction

Interventions

  • BehavioralFood craving induction

    Standardized craving induction procedure will be used, based on exposure to food-related images (https://www.lippc2s.fr/food-cal-pictures/). Craving intensity will be measured by visual analogic scale before and after the induction sequence.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Attention Network Test (ANT)

    The ANT is a task designed to test three attentional networks in children and adults: alerting, orienting, and executive control

    Time frame: 1 hour (after food craving induction)

  2. Dot Probe Task

    To test and measure selective attention

    Time frame: 1 hour (after food craving induction)

  3. Water load task

    This task was originally developed to induce gastric distension and assess gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with functional digestive disorders. This task stimulates the stomach using a natural distension stimulus (i.e., water ingestion) and without the complex hormonal response of a caloric meal.

    Time frame: 1 hour (after food craving induction)

  4. Live metacognition

    "live" metacognitive assessment will be done by asking the participants to rate their level of confidence on a visual analog scale ranging from 0% (I just guessed) to 100% (completely confident) for each items.

    Time frame: 1 hour (after food craving induction)

  5. Avoidance/Approach task adapted for food craving

    In this task, participants are asked to move a joystick that simulates the movement of the food represented in the image. The joystick movements are accompanied by a zoom effect that increases the illusion of movement.

    Time frame: 1 hour (after food craving induction)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)

    Minimum score : 0; Maximun score : 63; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

    The questionnaire includes two scales (20 items) consisting of a total of 40 questions. For each scale the minimum score is 0 and the maximun score is 80. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q)

    The measure provides four attitudinal subscale scores: Restraint (5 items), Eating Concern (5 items), Shape Concern (8 items), and Weight Concern (5 items). An overall Global score is the mean of the four subscale scores. Responses are on a 7-point ordinal response; minimum score : 0, maximun score: 6; higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Food Craving Questionnaire State (FCQ-S)

    Minimum : 15; Maximun : 75; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Food Craving Questionnaire Trait (FCQ-T)

    Minimum : 39; Maximun : 234; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Visual Analogic Scale of craving

    It represents a continuous visual progression of craving from one extreme to another, from "no craving at all" to "extreme and uncontrollable craving," with patients stating the intensity of their current craving between these two extremes.

    Time frame: Baseline, at 1 hour (after craving induction), at 3 hours (end of the session_

  7. Schedule for the Assessment of Insight in Eating Disorders (SAI-ED)

    Interview-based scale for the multidimensional assessment of insight in eating disorders. It includes three categories: illness awareness, symptom awareness, and treatment engagement. Minimum score : 0, maximun score: 29; Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale (DERS- 18)

    Minimum score : 18, maximun score : 90; Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Attentional Control Scale (ACS)

    Minimum score : 20, maximun score : 80; Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ)

    Minimum score: 18; Maximun score: 126; Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Age

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Gender

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Biological sex

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Weight

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Height

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Weight / Height2

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Waist and hips circumferences

    in cm

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Menopausal status or contraception

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Socio-professional category

    Number of participants per socioprofessional category as defined by statistic canada

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Medical history and concomitant treatment

    Rates of various associated diseases (e.g., cardiovascular, digestive disorders). Type of medications (antidepressants, antipsychotics, hypotensive drugs) and their rates.

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Ethnic origin

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Centre d'expertise Poids, Image et Alimentation (CEPIA)
    Québec, Canada
    Not yet recruiting
    • Catherine Bégin, PhD · Contact
  • IUCPQ
    Québec, Canada
    Recruiting
    • sylvain Iceta · Contact
  • Université de Nantes
    Nantes, France
    Not yet recruiting
    • Valentin Flaudias, Psy, PhD · Contact
    • Valentin Flaudias, Pdy, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Aurelien Cornil, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05879679
Lead sponsor
Laval University
Collaborators
Université de Nantes, Centre d'expertise Poids, Image et Alimentation (CEPIA), Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec
Responsible party
Sylvain Iceta (Associate professor, Laval University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 30, 2023
Start date
Jan 8, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 20, 2024

Study contacts

Gabrielle Hudon, Msc
Contact
equipe.iceta@criucpq.ulaval.ca
+14186568711 ext. 8015
Sylvain Iceta, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Fondation IUCPQ
Valentin Flaudias, Psy, PhD
study chair · Université de Nantes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion