ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05877560NIBSCIUpdated Dec 2, 2024

Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Symptomatic Convergence Insufficiency

An interventional study of Anodal-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Office-Based Vergence/Accommodative Therapy in Convergence Insufficiency, sponsored by Midwestern University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-02.

Sponsored by Midwestern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to test the effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation in treating adults with symptomatic convergence insufficiency compared to vergence/accommodative therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Can non-invasive brain stimulation shorten the treatment time of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy for convergence insufficiency?
  2. Is non-invasive brain stimulation alone just as effective as office-based vergence/accommodative therapy in treating convergence insufficiency?

The investigators hypothesize that non-invasive brain stimulation will shorten the treatment time from 12 weeks to 8 weeks of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy and that non-invasive brain stimulation alone would be equally effective as office-based vergence/accommodative therapy in improving symptomatic convergence insufficiency.

Participants will be randomized into one of three treatment groups:

  1. Non-invasive brain stimulation with office-based vergence/accommodative therapy.
  2. Sham stimulation with office-based vergence/accommodative therapy.
  3. Non-invasive brain stimulation only.

Researchers will compare baseline measurements of near point of convergence (NPC) and positive fusional vergence (PFV) to post-treatment measurements for each group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Convergence Insufficiency

Keywords

  • Convergence Insufficiency
  • Non-invasive Brain Stimulation
  • Office-Based Vergence/Accommodative Therapy
  • Frontal Eye Fields
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
03

In context

Ocular Motility Disorders

58 studies on the registry are indexed under Ocular Motility Disorders; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 91 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Ocular Motility Disorders.

Browse Ocular Motility Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Midwestern University is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Best-corrected visual acuity of > 20/25 in each eye at distance and near
  • Exophoria at near at least 4∆ greater than at far
  • Receded near point of convergence of > 6 cm break
  • Insufficient positive fusional vergence at near (\< 15∆ base-out blur or break)
  • CISS score of 16 and greater for children or 21 and greater for adults
  • Have had a dilated fundus examination within the last 12 months
  • and willingness to participate in the study and be randomized

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously treated for convergence insufficiency with home- or office-based vergence/accommodative therapy
  • Amblyopia (> 2-line difference in best-corrected visual acuity between the two eyes)
  • Constant strabismus
  • History of strabismus surgery
  • Convergence insufficiency secondary to acquired brain injury or neurological disorder
  • Manifest or latent nystagmus
  • Systemic disease known to affect accommodation, vergence, and ocular motility including multiple sclerosis, Graves disease, myasthenia gravis, Parkinson's disease, cerebral palsy, and diabetes
  • Developmental disability, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), learning disability or cognitive dysfunction that would interfere with treatment
  • Taking medications that can affect normal neurological function including antipsychotics, antiepileptics, and opioids
  • Presence of metal or electronic implants in or on the body, including pacemakers
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    NIBS-OBVAT

    8 sessions of non-invasive brain stimulation with 8 weeks of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy.

    Device: Anodal-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation · Behavioral: Office-Based Vergence/Accommodative Therapy

  • Active comparator
    NIBS

    8 sessions of non-invasive brain stimulation only.

    Device: Anodal-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    OBVAT

    8 sessions of sham stimulation with 8 weeks of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy.

    Behavioral: Office-Based Vergence/Accommodative Therapy · Device: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceAnodal-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

    Non-invasive brain stimulation will involve the use of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to apply a 2 milliamp current over the left frontal eye field for approximately 20 minutes with a ramp up to the maximum programmed current and ramp down of 20 seconds.

    Also known as: tDCS, a-tDCS

  • BehavioralOffice-Based Vergence/Accommodative Therapy

    Office-based vergence accommodative therapy involves weekly in-office appointments with the therapist lasting approximately 60 minutes per visit during which time in-office procedures will be performed, and home therapy procedures will be demonstrated. Participants will be prescribed 15 minutes of home reinforcement therapy procedures to be completed 5 days per week. Therapy will consist of two phases adapted from the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial (CITT). Therapy procedures will include gross convergence, accommodation. non-computer based vergence, and computer-based vergence.

    Also known as: OBVAT, Orthoptic training

  • DeviceSham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

    Sham transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied over the left frontal eye field with the current ramping up for 20 seconds before ramping down for 20 seconds. The 2 milliamp current stimulation will occur for only a few seconds at the start and at the end of the 20 minutes.

    Also known as: Sham tDCS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Near Point of Convergence (NPC)

    A change in the NPC break and recovery values measured in centimeters (cm) from baseline after treatment.

    Time frame: 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks during treatment; 6 months and 12 months post-treatment

  2. Positive Fusional Vergence (PFV)

    A change in the near PFV blur, break, and recovery values measured in prism diopters (∆) from baseline after treatment.

    Time frame: 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks during treatment; 6 months and 12 months post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Convergence Insufficiency Symptoms Survey (CISS)

    A change in the CISS score from baseline after treatment. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: 8 weeks during treatment; 6 months and 12 months post-treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Midwestern University Eye Institute
    Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, United States
    Recruiting
    • Sherri Olsen · Contactsolsen@midwestern.edu · 1-630-515-7368
    • Arijit Chakraborty, PhD · Contact
    • Adrienne C Quan, OD · Contact
    • Clinton R Prestwich, OD · Contact
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Duval JL, Jaubert D, Poizot-Martin I, De Jaureguiberry JP, Lafeuillade A, Giovannini M, Carloz E, Dhiver C, Gastaut JA. [Colonic leishmaniasis in AIDS]. Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1994;145(3):198-9. No abstract available. French. PubMed 8092638 ↗
  • Xie Y, Wan B, Li W. [Effect of bee pollen on maternal nutrition and fetal growth]. Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 1994 Dec;25(4):434-7. Chinese. PubMed 7744390 ↗
  • Nakano H, Ida T, Harada A, Horiba K, Sakakibara T, Kawase M, Tatsuno K, Obunai Y, Murata M. [Application of epicardial approach technique to the anterior-paraseptal type Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome]. Kyobu Geka. 1989 May;42(5):358-62. Japanese. PubMed 2779032 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Mar 2025; primary completion for Dec 2028, 45 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 17, 2023
First posted
May 26, 2023
StartEst.
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Dec 2, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05877560
Lead sponsor
Midwestern University
Responsible party
Arijit Chakraborty (Assistant Director of Research, Midwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2023
Start date
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 2, 2024

Study contacts

Arijit Chakraborty, PhD
Contact
achakr@midwestern.edu
630-960-3172
Adrienne C Quan, OD
Contact
aquan@midwestern.edu
630-960-3183

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion