ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05874505UVBUpdated May 25, 2023

"Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab to That of Tocilizumab in Severe Uveitis of Behçet's Disease"

A Phase 2 interventional study of Adalimumab and Tocilizumab in Behcet's Uveitis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-25.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

UVB, is the first randomized prospective, head to head study, comparing Adalimumab to Tocilizumab in sight threatening uveitis of Behçet's Disease (BD). Anti-TNFα has been used for BD uveitis for 15 years. The incidence of blindness in BD has been dramatically reduced in the recent years with the use of biologics. There is no firm evidence or randomized controlled trials directly addressing the best induction therapy in severe BD uveitis. BD uveitis is considered as the most devastating inflammatory ocular disease. Risk of visual loss reaches 25% at 5 years and 80% of patients have a bilateral involvement. Contrasting with immunosuppressors or interferon-alpha, biotherapies act rapidly and are highly effective in steroid's sparing thus preventing occurrence of cataract and/or glaucoma. However, anti-TNFα failed to demonstrate sustainable complete remission over 50 % of severe sight threatening uveitis. There is little published information on use of biologics other than anti-TNFα for severe BD uveitis. Tocilizumab has been used with success in severe and/or resistant cases and is one of the most promising biologics in BD. IL-6 expression correlates with BD activity and other immunological data provide a strong rationale for targeting BD with tocilizumab. Despite a strong rationale, these compounds are not yet approved in BD, which guarantees the innovative nature of this study that aims selecting or dropping any arm when evidence of efficacy already exists. The objective of the study is to assess the benefit of tocilizumab comparatively to that of adalimumab in sight-threatening Behçet's disease uveitis at week 16

02

Conditions studied

  • Behcet's Uveitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Biologics
  • Adalimumab
  • Tocilizumab
03

In context

Uveitis

299 studies on the registry are indexed under Uveitis; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 30 across 175 interventional studies indexed under Uveitis.

Browse Uveitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age >= 18 at Inclusion
  2. Provide written, prior to the performance of any study-specific procedures
  3. Diagnosis of Behçet's disease according to the International Criteria for Behçet's Disease (ICBD) or history of aphthosis.
  4. Diagnosis of non-infectious intermediate, posterior-, or pan-uveitis in at least one eye fulfilling the International Study Group Classification Criteria (Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature [SUN] criteria) of posterior, or pan- uveitis
  5. Sight threatening uveitis defined according to the validated international definition as 2 lines of drop in visual acuity on a 10/10 scale, and/or retinal inflammation (macular oedema and/or retinal vasculitis).
  6. Chest X-ray (postero-anterior and lateral) or CT-scanner results within 12 weeks prior to Inclusion with no evidence of active Tuberculosis, active infection, or
  7. For female subjects of (premenopausal female capable of becoming pregnant) , a negative serum pregnancy test (plasmatic or urinary)
  8. For subjects with , a willingness to use measures adequate to prevent the subject or the subject's partner from becoming pregnant during the study and 3 and 5 months after stopping therapy for tocilizumab and adalimumab, respectively. Birth control methods which may be considered as highly effective methods that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly are considered as highly effective birth control methods (according to CTFG recommendations). Such methods include:

    • combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation:

      • oral
      • intravaginal
      • transdermal
    • progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation:

      • oral
      • injectable
      • implantable
    • intrauterine device (IUD)
    • intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
    • bilateral tubal occlusion
    • vasectomised partner
    • sexual abstinence (In the context of this guidance sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject).

    For male subjects :

    • use of a condom
    • vasectomy (with documentation of azoospermia)
    • sexual abstinence
  9. A potential subject with a positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) (e.g., QuantiFERON®-TB Gold or T-spot TB® Test) obtained within 6 months prior to inclusion is eligible if her/his chest X-ray does not show evidence suggestive of active TB disease and there are no clinical signs and symptoms of pulmonary and/or extra-pulmonary TB disease. These subjects with a latent TB infection who have not already received a prophylactic TB treatment must agree in advance to complete such a treatment course. The treatment should be started at the latest at inclusion.
  10. Affiliation to a social security system. Patients affiliated to universal medical coverage (CMU) are eligible for the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Infectious uveitis, masquerade syndromes, or uveitis due to causes other than BD uveitis
  2. Active tuberculosis or history of untreated tuberculosis and/or severe infection
  3. Positive antibody and/or positive surface antigen and/or positive RNA, results obtained within 1 month prior to inclusion
  4. History of within 5 years prior to Inclusion other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated, non- squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  5. History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to monoclonal antibodies
  6. History of multiple sclerosis and/or demyelinating disorder
  7. to the active substance or an of the Medicinal Product or the auxiliary medicine
  8. Active or suspected ocular infection
  9. Active or suspected systemic infection
  10. History of intestinal ulceration or diverticulitis
  11. Known porphyria
  12. Laboratory values assessed during Inclusion:

    1. Neutrophil \< 1.0 x 10\^3 /mm3
    2. count \< 80 x 10\^3 /mm3
    3. ASAT or ALAT > 5
  13. Treatment with anti-TNF and/or Tocilizumab therapy within 1 month prior to inclusion
  14. if on azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or methotrexate at the time of inclusion, these drugs must be withdrawn prior to receiving the tocilizumab or adalimumab dose on Day 0
  15. Stage III and IV (NYHA) cardiac insufficiency
  16. Severe renal ( (GFR) \<30ml/min) or liver insufficiency (prothrombin \<50% without other causes)
  17. Any live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to inclusion
  18. Breastfeeding or pregnant women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Adalimumab

    Adalimumab 80 mg at Day 0 then 40 mg subcutaneous at week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15

    Drug: Adalimumab

  • Experimental
    Tocilizumab

    Tocilizumab 162 mg subcutaneous each week for 15 weeks

    Drug: Tocilizumab

Interventions

  • Adalimumab 80 mg at Day 0 then 40 mg subcutaneous at week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15

  • Tocilizumab 162 mg subcutaneous each week for 15 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with complete remission of ocular involvement (Efficacy)

    Efficacy will be defined by a complete remission of ocular involvement with prednisone lower or equal to 5 mg/day . Ocular involvement response to treatment will be evaluated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Workgroup criteria.

    Time frame: At week 16 after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent of patients meeting the corticosteroid sparing targets

    lower than 0.1 mg/day/kg of prednisone

    Time frame: At week 16 after randomization

  2. Mean dose of corticosteroids

    Time frame: At week 16 after randomization

  3. Cumulative dose of corticosteroids

    Time frame: At week 16 after randomization

  4. Time to response onset

    Time frame: Up to week 48

  5. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Time frame: At week 4

  6. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Time frame: At week 8

  7. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Time frame: At week 12

  8. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Time frame: At week 16

  9. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Time frame: At week 24

  10. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Time frame: At week 36

  11. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Time frame: At week 48

  12. C-reactive protein rate

    Time frame: At week 4

  13. C-reactive protein rate

    Time frame: At week 8

  14. C-reactive protein rate

    Time frame: At week 12

  15. C-reactive protein rate

    Time frame: At week 16

  16. C-reactive protein rate

    Time frame: At week 24

  17. C-reactive protein rate

    Time frame: At week 36

  18. C-reactive protein rate

    Time frame: At week 48

  19. Rate of relapses

    Relapse will be defined as the reappearance of clinical and/or paraclinical features of active disease or by the occurrence of new lesions or progression of preexisting lesions

    Time frame: up to 48 weeks

  20. Time to occurrence of relapse or worsening of uveitis

    Relapse will be defined as the reappearance of clinical and/or paraclinical features of active disease or by the occurrence of new lesions or progression of preexisting lesions

    Time frame: up to 48 weeks

  21. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Disease Current Activity

    Changes in Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form 2006 The score varies between 0 and 12, the higher the score the higher the disease activity. Lawton G, Bhakta BB, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A. The Behcet's disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jan;43(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg453. Epub 2003 Jul 30. PMID: 12890862.

    Time frame: At week 8

  22. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Disease Current Activity

    Changes in Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form 2006 The score varies between 0 and 12, the higher the score the higher the disease activity. Lawton G, Bhakta BB, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A. The Behcet's disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jan;43(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg453. Epub 2003 Jul 30. PMID: 12890862.

    Time frame: At week 16

  23. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Disease Current Activity

    Changes in Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form 2006 The score varies between 0 and 12, the higher the score the higher the disease activity. Lawton G, Bhakta BB, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A. The Behcet's disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jan;43(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg453. Epub 2003 Jul 30. PMID: 12890862.

    Time frame: At week 24

  24. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score

    Changes in Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score. It is a 10 items score. The score varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the higher the disease activity. Forbees C, Swearingen C, Yazici Y. Behcet's syndrome activity score (BSAS): a new disease activity assessment tool, composed of patient-derived measures only, is strongly correlated with the Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(Suppl 9):S854-S855.

    Time frame: At week 8

  25. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score

    Changes in Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score. It is a 10 items score. The score varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the higher the disease activity. Forbees C, Swearingen C, Yazici Y. Behcet's syndrome activity score (BSAS): a new disease activity assessment tool, composed of patient-derived measures only, is strongly correlated with the Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(Suppl 9):S854-S855.

    Time frame: At week 16

  26. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score

    Changes in Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score It is a 10 items score. The score varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the higher the disease activity. Forbees C, Swearingen C, Yazici Y. Behcet's syndrome activity score (BSAS): a new disease activity assessment tool, composed of patient-derived measures only, is strongly correlated with the Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(Suppl 9):S854-S855.

    Time frame: week 24

  27. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Time frame: At week 4

  28. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Time frame: At week 8

  29. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Time frame: At week 12

  30. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Time frame: At week 16

  31. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Time frame: At week 24

  32. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Time frame: At week 36

  33. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Time frame: At week 48

  34. Quality of Life assessed by Behcet's Disease Quality of Life Measure

    It is a score composed of 30 items and the result varies between 0 and 30. The higher the score, the lower the quality of life. G. Gilworth, MA Chamberlain, B. Bhakta, A. Silman, D. Haskard and A. Tennant. (2004), The Development of the BD-Qol: A Quality of Life Instrument Specific to Behçet's Disease., J Rheum, 31, 931-7

    Time frame: At week 16

  35. Quality of Life assessed by Behcet's Disease Quality of Life Measure

    It is a score composed of 30 items and the result varies between 0 and 30. The higher the score, the lower the quality of life. G. Gilworth, MA Chamberlain, B. Bhakta, A. Silman, D. Haskard and A. Tennant. (2004), The Development of the BD-Qol: A Quality of Life Instrument Specific to Behçet's Disease., J Rheum, 31, 931-7

    Time frame: At week 24

  36. Changes in Short Form (36) Health Survey for quality of life

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

    Time frame: At week 16

  37. Changes in Short Form (36) Health Survey for quality of life

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

    Time frame: At week 24

  38. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Time frame: at week 4

  39. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Time frame: at week 8

  40. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Time frame: at week 12

  41. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Time frame: at week 16

  42. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Time frame: at week 24

  43. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Time frame: at week 36

  44. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Time frame: at week 48

  45. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Time frame: At week 4

  46. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death. death.

    Time frame: At week 8

  47. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Time frame: At week 12

  48. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Time frame: At week 16

  49. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Time frame: At week 24

  50. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Time frame: At week 36

  51. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Time frame: At week 48

  52. Changes in Tyndall score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.

    Time frame: At week 8

  53. Changes in Tyndall score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterio chamber.

    Time frame: At week 16

  54. Changes in Tyndall score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.

    Time frame: At week 24

  55. Changes in Tyndall score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.

    Time frame: At week 36

  56. Changes in Tyndall score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.

    Time frame: At week 48

  57. Changes in flare score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.

    Time frame: At week 8

  58. Changes in flare score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.

    Time frame: At week 16

  59. Changes in flare score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.

    Time frame: At week 24

  60. Changes in flare score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.

    Time frame: At week 36

  61. Changes in flare score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.

    Time frame: At week 48

  62. Changes of Vitreous Haze

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.

    Time frame: At week 8

  63. Changes of Vitreous Haze

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.

    Time frame: At week 16

  64. Changes of Vitreous Haze

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.

    Time frame: At week 24

  65. Changes of Vitreous Haze

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.

    Time frame: At week 36

  66. Changes of Vitreous Haze

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.

    Time frame: At week 48

  67. Changes in Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluated by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity. ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

    Time frame: At week 8

  68. Changes in Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

    Time frame: At week 16

  69. Changes in Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

    Time frame: At week 24

  70. Changes in Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

    Time frame: At week 36

  71. Changes in Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

    Time frame: At week 48

  72. Changes in central retinal thickness

    Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Time frame: At week 8

  73. Changes in central retinal thickness

    Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Time frame: At week 16

  74. Changes in central retinal thickness

    Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Time frame: At week 24

  75. Changes in central retinal thickness

    Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Time frame: At week 36

  76. Changes in central retinal thickness

    Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Time frame: At week 48

  77. Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns

    Time frame: At week 8

  78. Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns

    Time frame: At week 16

  79. Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns

    Time frame: At week 24

  80. Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns

    Time frame: At week 36

  81. Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns

    Time frame: At week 48

  82. Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography

    in case of retinal vasculitis

    Time frame: At week 16

  83. Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography

    in case of retinal vasculitis

    Time frame: At week 24

  84. Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography

    in case of retinal vasculitis

    Time frame: At week 36

  85. Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography

    in case of retinal vasculitis

    Time frame: At week 48

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2023; primary completion for Nov 2026, 40 months later.

Of 17 phase 2 interventional studies under Uveitis, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 40 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 14, 2023
First posted
May 25, 2023
StartEst.
Jul 2023
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 2027
Last update
May 25, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05874505
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2023
Start date
Jul 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 25, 2023

Study contacts

Bahram BODAGHI, Pr
Contact
bahram.bodaghi@aphp.fr
+33 1 42 16 37 28
Matthieu RESCHE-RIGON, Pr
Contact
matthieu.resche-rigon@u-paris.fr
+33 1 42 49 97 42

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Adalimumab · Tocilizumab

Start the discussion