CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05864625Updated Aug 1, 2025

Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Using Remimazolam and Sevoflurane in Minimally Invasive AVR

An interventional study of Remimazolam besylate and Propofol/ Sevoflurane in Aortic Valve Stenosis and Remimazolam, sponsored by Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. Completed at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-01.

Sponsored by Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension, and be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. This study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Read the detailed description

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension due to reduced cardiac contractility and vasodilation. This can be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse in extreme cases. Remimazolam is a relatively new anesthetic agent and it is a ultra-short acting benzodiazepine with a context sensitive half time of 7.5 minutes. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. Previous studies have also shown that remimazolam can be safely used in patients with severe aortic stenosis and in cardiac anesthesia induction and during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, there is no definite data on comparison of hemodynamic variables between remimazolam based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and conventional propofol induction and sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia. Therefore, this study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Remimazolam

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Remimazolam
03

In context

Aortic Valve Stenosis

985 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 120 across 525 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 106 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 19 years old
  • Patients with severe aortic stenosis, undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known allergy to benzodiazepine, flumazenil, propofol
  • Patients with galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, glucose-galactose malabsorption
  • Patients with hypersensitivity to Dextran40
  • Patients who have been taking benzodiazepine for long term
  • Patients with whom heart rate assessment is not accurate, such as atrial fibrillation
  • Patients with end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis
  • Patients with history of acute angle glaucoma
  • Patients with valve disease severity of grade III or higher, other than aortic valve
  • Emergency operation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Remimazolam

    Induction dose of 6 mg/kg/h of remimazolam with remifentanil TCI 1\~4 nanogram/mL are injected together. When patient loses consciousness, rocuronium 0.8 mg/kg is given and endotracheal intubation is performed after confirming that TOF count is less than one. Anesthesia is maintained by using remimazolam dose of 1mg/kg/h\~2mg/kg/h with remifentanil to maintain optimal depth of anesthesia, which will checked by Sedline value between 25 to 50.

    Drug: Remimazolam besylate

  • Active comparator
    Propofol/sevoflurane

    1% propofol 1-2mg/kg is injected with remifentanil TCI 1\~4, and when patient loses consciousness, sevoflurane is started and rocuronium 0.8mg/kg is given. After confirming that TOF count is less than one, intubation is performed and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil to keep the Sedline value between 25 and 50.

    Drug: Propofol/ Sevoflurane

Interventions

  • DrugRemimazolam besylate

    During induction, patients allocated to the remimazolam group will receive remimazolam 6mg/kg/h with remifentanil TCI 1\~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with remimazolam 1-2mg/kg/h combied with remifetanil.

    Also known as: Remimazolam besylate, Byfavo Inj., Hana Pharm Col, Ltd., Seoul, Korea

  • DrugPropofol/ Sevoflurane

    During induction, patients allocated to the P/S group will receive propofol 1% 1-2mg/kg with remifentanil TCI 1\~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil.

    Also known as: Fresofol 1% TM, Fresenius

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total dose of vasopressors and inotropics used.

    Total dose of vasopressors and inotropics used during anesthesia will be compared between two groups.

    Time frame: Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hypotension and bradycardia event duration

    Hypotension and bradycardia event duration will be compared

    Time frame: Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia

  2. Extubation time

    Extubation time between the two groups will be compared

    Time frame: End of anesthesia to extubation

  3. Emergence agitation

    Emergence agitation will be compared between the two groups using Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale upon arrival at ICU. The Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale uses a numeric score from 1 (unarousable) to 7 (dangerous agitation)to assess the level of patient sedation and identifies seven levels of sedation and agitation, which range from deep sedation (unarousable) to dangerous agitation.

    Time frame: Arrival of patient at ICU

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
    Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do 50612, South Korea
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee J, Shin SW, Yoon JU, Kim HJ, Yoon JP, Shon HS, Lee DE, Kim HY. Vasopressor requirements and hemodynamic stability during anesthesia using remimazolam and sevoflurane in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Thorac Dis. 2026 Apr 30;18(4):342. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2026-1-0072. Epub 2026 Mar 27. PubMed 42182779 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05864625
Lead sponsor
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Responsible party
Kim Hee Young (Assistant professor for fund, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 18, 2023
Start date
Jun 29, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 10, 2025
Completion
Jun 10, 2025
Last update
Aug 1, 2025

Study contacts

Hee Young Kim, MD, PhD
study director · Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion