An interventional study of Plyometric and strengthening exercises and Strengthening exercise in Glenohumeral Subluxation, Shoulder Subluxation and Shoulder Instability Subluxation Bilateral, sponsored by National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-22.
Sponsored by National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the additional effects of upper extremity plyometric training versus strength training alone in recreational overhead athletes with shoulder instability. The investigators hypothesis that compared to strengthening training alone, plyometric training combined with strengthening training will significantly improve shoulder isokinetic strength, proprioception, scapular kinematics, symptoms of shoulder instability, and shoulder function.
Background: Shoulder instability is a common problem in active young adults with a wide spectrum ranging from microinstability, subluxation to dislocation. In patients with instability of Stanmore polar type 2 or 3, recurrent shoulder instability may be related to abnormal movement patterns but not result from trauma. Non-operative management is suggested to this subgroup as the first-line treatment. Previous rehabilitation protocols including progressive shoulder muscles strengthening and neuromuscular control training have shown positive effects on functional outcomes in individuals with shoulder instability. Recent protocols for shoulder instability usually include various types of plyometric training to prepare injured athletes to return to sports. Plyometric training in lower extremity has been wildly used for knee injury prevention. In upper extremity, plyometrics also has been shown to improve isokinetic strength, throwing performance, and proprioception in healthy subjects and healthy overhead athletes. However, it is still not well-understood that whether a strengthening training combined with plyometrics would be more effective to improve shoulder neuromuscular control and shoulder function in subjects with instability. The purpose of this study is to investigate the additional effects of upper extremity plyometric training in recreational overhead athletes with anterior shoulder instability. The investigators hypothesis that compared to strengthening training alone, plyometric training combined with strengthening training will significantly improve strength, proprioception, shoulder kinematic and muscle activity, shoulder pain and shoulder function.
Methods: A total of 64 participants with anterior shoulder instability will be randomized to either an experimental group (plyometric and strengthening training) or a control group (strengthening training). Both groups will receive a 50-minute supervised training protocol twice a week for 6 weeks. The primary outcomes include (1) isokinetic assessment of internal and external rotation (peak torque, time to peak torque, and amortization time); (2) proprioception (active and passive joint position sense); (3) seated medicine ball throw test (distance in cm). The secondary outcomes include (1) shoulder pain and instability with 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS); (2) shoulder function assessed with the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; (3) Global rating of change (GRC). GRC will be measured after the end of 12 session of intervention, and all the other outcomes will be measured at baseline and following 12 sessions of exercise training. The two-way repeated measures ANOVAs will be used to compare primary and secondary outcome variables between groups. The significant level was set at 0.05.
105 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Dislocation; 22 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 64 is close to the median of 60 across 71 interventional studies indexed under Shoulder Dislocation.
Browse Shoulder Dislocation studies →National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University is the lead sponsor of 208 studies on the registry; 60 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants in this group will receive upper extremity plyometric training in body weight or with weight ball and strengthening exercises with band, dumbbell and barbell. The difficulty and intensity of the movement protocol will increase weekly. They will be trained 2 times per week for 6 weeks with an average duration of 50 min per session.
Procedure: Plyometric and strengthening exercises
Participants in this group will receive upper extremity strengthening exercises with band, dumbbell and barbell. The intensity of the movement protocol will increase weekly. They will be trained 2 times per week for 6 weeks with an average duration of 50 min per session.
Procedure: Strengthening exercise
Each session includes 2 upper-extremity plyometric exercises in bodyweight or with weight ball for 15-20 minutes and 4-5 strengthening exercises with band, dumbbell or barbell for 30-35 minutes. The difficulty of the movement protocol will increase weekly. They will be trained 2 times per week for 6 weeks with an average duration of 50 min per session.
Each session includes 5 upper-extremity strengthening exercises with band, dumbbell or barbell for 50 minutes. The difficulty of the movement protocol will increase weekly. They will be trained 2 times per week for 6 weeks with an average duration of 50 min per session.
Shoulder isokinetic muscle strength
Shoulder isokinetic muscle strength will be measured by dynamometer in 3 modes (concentric/concentric, concentric/eccentric, eccentric/concentric) at 3 angular velocities (90°/s, 180°/s, \& 240°/s), 1 set of 5 repetitions for each angular velocities. Shoulder isokinetic muscle strength will be normalized by body weight (BW) and described with peak torque/BW (N·m·kg-1).
Time frame: Change from baseline shoulder isokinetic muscle strength through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
Shoulder acceleration time, deceleration time, and amortization time
Shoulder acceleration time, deceleration time, and amortization time will be measured by dynamometer in concentric/concentric mode at 3 angular velocities (90°/s, 180°/s, \& 240°/s) and will be described with millisecond (ms).
Time frame: Change from baseline shoulder isokinetic muscle strength through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
Shoulder proprioception
Shoulder proprioception will be measured by dynamometer in 90° shoulder abduction and 90° elbow flexion position, including active joint position sense and passive joint position sense. The proprioception will be described with degree of error from target position.
Time frame: Change from baseline shoulder external rotation joint position sense through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
Seated medicine ball throw distance
Subjects will throw a 2kg soft weighted ball as far forward as possible with dominant arms while sitting with back against a wall and legs bending with feet flat on the floor. Outcomes include average throwing distance and maximal throwing distance (cm). The distances are measured with measure tape.
Time frame: Change from baseline seated medicine ball throw distance through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
Shoulder function
Shoulder function will be measured by the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire, including the disability/symptom section (30 items, scored 1-5) and the optional high performance Sport/Music or Work section (4 items, scored 1-5). A higher score indicates greater disability.
Time frame: Change from baseline DASH questionnaire through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
Visual analogue scale (VAS) of shoulder pain and instability
Shoulder pain and instability will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). Subjects need to mark the point that they feel represent their perception of their current state on a 10-cm line. Scores range from 0 (no symptom) to 100 (maximum symptom).
Time frame: Change from baseline VAS of shoulder pain and instability through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
Global rating of change (GRC)
The improvements in a patient's condition will be measured with 15-point self-report GRC scale. Score ranges from -7 (lack of progress) to 7 (maximum of progress).
Time frame: through completion of 12-session intervention, an average of 6 weeks
Ran from May 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2025, 22 months.
Of 39 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Shoulder Dislocation, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 39. This study's 22 months is close to that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 39 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 39.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University →