CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05854485Updated Dec 23, 2025

Robot-Aided Assessment and Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity Function After Stroke

An interventional study of REACH robotic training and multi-muscle Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) group and Robot only group in Stroke, sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-23.

Sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy of a hybrid-based rehabilitation program for the upper extremity(UE) combining the interventions- Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and Robotic rehabilitation in individuals with chronic stroke. The main question it aims to answer is if the Hybrid multi-muscle FES+Robot upper extremity rehabilitation is more effective in improving the upper extremity motor impairments and function as compared to robotic upper extremity training alone.

Read the detailed description

Individuals with chronic stroke(> 6months after stroke) will be recruited. All participants will complete clinical and kinematic assessments at 2 time points(baseline and after 6 weeks training). Each participant will receive 18 sessions of 60 minute upper extremity training over 6 weeks.

Study participants will be randomly assigned to receive either of the following upper extremity training- 1. Hybrid multi-muscle FES+Robot training group or 2.Robot only training group.

The following clinical assessments to measure the motor impairments and functional recovery will be performed: Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity, Modified Ashworth Scale, and Wolf Motor Function Test.

Kinematic assessments will be conducted using the REACH robotic device and the Kinereach/trakStar system. The following kinematic parameters will be collected: Smoothness, Range of Motion, and Speed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Robotic Rehabilitation
  • Functional Electrical Stimulation
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, Baltimore is the lead sponsor of 687 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 63 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Individuals with chronic stroke(>6months post stroke)
  2. Age-22-85 years old
  3. Ability to perform a Upper Extremity forward reach of about 3 inches

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Upper Extremity co-morbidities-pain, arthritis, and other neurological disorders
  2. Unable to tolerate electrical stimulation
  3. Have implants such as pacemaker, spinal cord or deep brain stimulator
  4. Have an elbow contracture of greater than 150 degrees
  5. Receiving Botox injections within 3 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hybrid multi-muscle FES+Robot

    Participants will be receive hybrid upper extremity training involving the combination of REACH robotic device and multi-muscle FES. Water based electrodes will be positioned on the Triceps, Anconeus, wrist and finger extensors. Stimulation intensity of FES will be set at the participants tolerance level. The FES induced muscle contraction timing will be triggered in synchrony with the robotic movement. The training will be a multi-directional reach movement and hand opening re-training.

    Combination Product: REACH robotic training and multi-muscle Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) group

  • Active comparator
    Robot only

    Participants will receive upper extremity training with the REACH robotic device. The training will be a multi-directional reach movement re-training.

    Combination Product: Robot only group

Interventions

  • Combination productREACH robotic training and multi-muscle Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) group

    Participants in this group will receive multi-muscle FES during arm robotic training

  • Combination productRobot only group

    Participants in this group will receive arm robotic training only

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Kinematic Assessment:Smoothness in 1/s2

    This measure will be collected as the participants performs target reaching out and in movements of the arm. Smoothness will be collected from the REACH robotic device to determine the kinematic changes in the reaching movements. Kinereach/trakStar system will also be utilized to conduct kinematic assessment and determine the translation of training effects into functional upper extremity use.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Smoothness at 6 weeks

  2. Kinematic Assessment:Speed in cm/seconds

    This measure will be collected as the participants performs target reaching out and in movements of the arm. Speed will be collected from the REACH robotic device to determine the kinematic changes in the reaching movements. Kinereach/trakStar system will also be utilized to conduct kinematic assessment and determine the translation of training effects into functional upper extremity use.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Speed at 6 weeks

  3. Kinematic Assessment:Range of Motion(ROM) in cms

    This measure will be collected as the participants performs target reaching out and in movements of the arm. ROM will be collected from the REACH robotic device to determine the kinematic changes in the reaching movements. Kinereach/trakStar system will also be utilized to conduct kinematic assessment and determine the translation of training effects into functional upper extremity use.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline ROM at 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity(FMA-UE)

    FMA-UE is a standard measure for the clinical assessment of motor impairment. FMA mainly evaluates the degree of synergy pattern during volitional movements, along with reflex activity and coordination. It is based on 33 items and scores range from 0 to 66. A higher score means better motor function.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline FMA-UE at 6 weeks

  2. Modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity (MAS)

    The MAS is a measurement of spasticity across specific muscle groups. The grading of spasticity ranges from 0 to 5 with higher score indicating worse functioning.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline MAS at 6 weeks

  3. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)

    WMFT is a function based test designed to measure upper extremity movements and movement speed during functional tasks. The WMFT consists of 17 items, of which 15 measure time to perform functional tasks and 2 strength-based tasks. Two types of scores are recorded during the task:WMFT-TIME(time of the task) and WMFT-FAS (functional abilities). The maximum score of WMFT-TIME is 120 seconds, and a higher score means slower movement. WMFT-FAS is scored from 0 to 5, and a higher score indicates higher level of functional performance, better quality of the paretic upper extremity during the task.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline WMFT at 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Maryland School of Medicine
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Resquin F, Cuesta Gomez A, Gonzalez-Vargas J, Brunetti F, Torricelli D, Molina Rueda F, Cano de la Cuerda R, Miangolarra JC, Pons JL. Hybrid robotic systems for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: A review. Med Eng Phys. 2016 Nov;38(11):1279-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 29. PubMed 27692878 ↗
  • Hughes AM, Freeman CT, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E. Feasibility of iterative learning control mediated by functional electrical stimulation for reaching after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(6):559-68. doi: 10.1177/1545968308328718. Epub 2009 Feb 3. PubMed 19190087 ↗
  • Duret C, Grosmaire AG, Krebs HI. Robot-Assisted Therapy in Upper Extremity Hemiparesis: Overview of an Evidence-Based Approach. Front Neurol. 2019 Apr 24;10:412. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00412. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31068898 ↗
  • Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006 Jun 21;3:12. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-12. PubMed 16790067 ↗
  • Volpe BT, Lynch D, Rykman-Berland A, Ferraro M, Galgano M, Hogan N, Krebs HI. Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):305-10. doi: 10.1177/1545968307311102. Epub 2008 Jan 9. PubMed 18184932 ↗
  • Ambrosini E, Zajc J, Ferrante S, Ferrigno G, Gasperina SD, Bulgheroni M, Baccinelli W, Schauer T, Wiesener C, Russold M, Gfoehler M, Puchinger M, Weber M, Becker S, Krakow K, Immick N, Augsten A, Rossini M, Proserpio D, Gasperini G, Molteni F, Pedrocchi A. A Hybrid Robotic System for Arm Training of Stroke Survivors: Concept and First Evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Dec;66(12):3290-3300. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2900525. Epub 2019 Jun 5. PubMed 31180833 ↗
  • Collins KC, Kennedy NC, Clark A, Pomeroy VM. Kinematic Components of the Reach-to-Target Movement After Stroke for Focused Rehabilitation Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2018 Jun 25;9:472. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00472. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29988530 ↗
  • Turner DL, Ramos-Murguialday A, Birbaumer N, Hoffmann U, Luft A. Neurophysiology of robot-mediated training and therapy: a perspective for future use in clinical populations. Front Neurol. 2013 Nov 13;4:184. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00184. PubMed 24312073 ↗
  • Moon SH, Choi JH, Park SE. The effects of functional electrical stimulation on muscle tone and stiffness of stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Feb;29(2):238-241. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.238. Epub 2017 Feb 24. PubMed 28265148 ↗
  • Rao S, Boettger B, Alon G, Whitall J, Hennessie B, Roy A, P Westlake K. Extending reach: hybrid robotic-functional electrical stimulation training for post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2026 Mar 16;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12984-026-01942-7. PubMed 41840604 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05854485
Lead sponsor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Responsible party
Kelly Westlake (Associate Professor, University of Maryland, Baltimore) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 11, 2023
Start date
Sep 6, 2023
Primary completion
May 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Dec 23, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion