ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05853952Updated May 5, 2026

Non-invasive Neuromodulation NESA Application in the Rehabilitation of Stroke Sequelae

An interventional study of Non-invasive Neuromodulation and Placebo Non-invasive Neuromodulation in Stroke, sponsored by University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.

Sponsored by University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2023; still recruiting 3 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate whether NESA microcurrents can be used as an effective treatment for various sequelae present in stroke patients, specifically in the treatment of spasticity, balance, pain; and whether it affects quality of life, performance of activities of daily living and quality of sleep.

Read the detailed description

Pilot study following a randomized controlled trial design, designed to study the feasibility of a study with a larger sample size.

Intervention of 30 stroke participants with an evolution between 6 months and 4 years since the stroke, who are able to stand upright.

These participants will be recruited voluntarily through a campaign in social networks and with the collaboration of local associations and institutions. Once the inclusion and exclusion criteria have been reviewed, they will be randomly assigned to an intervention group and a placebo group. A double-blind recruitment system will be followed in which the physiotherapist and patients will not know whether they are receiving real or simulated stimulation, for this purpose two NESA XSIGNAL® devices will be used in double-blind mode.

Treatment of 20 sessions per patient, of 1 hour duration each, with the NESA X-Signal device.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • physical therapy modality
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • People who have suffered a stroke with an evolution between 6 months and 6 years.
  • Optimal cognitive capacity and mentally competent to participate in the study and complete the required questionnaires.
  • People able of standing upright, including those who need technical aids.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Present some of the for a treatment with NESA XSIGNAL®: pacemakers, internal bleeding, not to apply electrodes on skin in bad condition, with ulcerations or wounds, acute febrile processes, acute thrombophlebitis and/or phobia to electricity.
  • Not having signed the form.
  • Presenting any additional injury or pathology during the study.
  • Not having the optimal cognitive capacities for understanding and participating in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Non-invasive Neuromodulation

    The non-invasive neuromodulation experimental group, are treated 20 sessions with the NXSignal non-invasive neuromodulation device (NESA)

    Device: Non-invasive Neuromodulation

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Non-invasive Neuromodulation

    The non-invasive neuromodulation placebo group, are treated 20 sessions with the NXSignal non-invasive neuromodulation device (NESA)

    Device: Placebo Non-invasive Neuromodulation

Interventions

  • DeviceNon-invasive Neuromodulation

    The electrodes will be placed with the help of gloves and adapted socks for 1 hour, each session, until 13 intervention sessions are completed. In addition, depending on the session, an adhesive electrode will be placed at the level of C7. Characteristics of microcurrents: pulsed monophasic rectangular wave with a pulse of 1.3 s and pause of 300 ms, voltage 3 millivolt and intensity 0.5 μA

  • DevicePlacebo Non-invasive Neuromodulation

    The same protocol described for the experimental group will be applied, but microcurrents device which will be previously manipulated and tested with an oscilloscope so that they do not emit electrical currents.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain assessed by VAS

    The instrument will be used to measure the change of pain before and after the intervention will be the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants will be asked to mark the level of their pain on a 100 mm, no hatched VAS scale marked at one end as "no pain" and at the other as "worst pain imaginable".

    Time frame: Up to 7 weeks

  2. Change in Sleep quality

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) will be used. It consists of 19 self-administered questions and 5 questions assessed by the patient's partner or roommate (if available). Only the self-administered questions are included in the score. The higher the total score, the worse the sleep quality. Thus, a total score less than or equal to five on the Pittsburgh scale indicates that, in general, your sleep quality is optimal, while a total score greater than five suggests that you have sleep problems, of greater or lesser severity.

    Time frame: Up to 7 weeks

  3. Changes in quality of life

    The Stroke-specific quality of life scale ( ECVI-38) is a specific scale for stroke patients. This instrument includes 38 items divided into eight subgroups: physical status, communication, cognition, emotions, feelings, basic activities of daily living, common activities of daily living and socio-familial functioning. The format presents five response possibilities: 5 represents the worst situation and 1 represents the absence of the problem.

    Time frame: Up to 7 weeks

  4. Changes in the level of autonomy

    The Barthel index for the level of independence in performing activities of daily living. The purpose of this questionnaire is to assign a score to each patient based on his or her degree of dependence in performing a series of basic activities. The values assigned to each activity depend on the time taken to perform them and the need for aids to complete them. activity of daily living include: eating, transferring between chair and bed, personal grooming, toileting, bathing/showering, transferring, going up/down stairs, dressing/dressing, stool control and urine control. The activities are assessed by assigning a score between 0, 5, 10 and 15 points and the final result can vary between 0 (completely dependent) and 100 points (completely independent).

    Time frame: Up to 7 weeks

  5. Changes in their ability to balance

    The Berg balance scale will be used: A quantitative measure of functional balance status in the elderly that has proven to be a valid, reliable and sensitive tool in hemiplegic patients. The Berg scale includes 14 items (scored between 0-4) and total scores range from 0 (severe balance impairment) to 56 (optimal balance status).

    Time frame: Up to 7 weeks

  6. Changes in muscle tone

    The modified Ashworth scale for spasticity will be used. A scale used in the clinic to assess muscle spasticity, the modification adds a level that incorporates the angle at which resistance appears and monitors the speed of passive movement with a one-second count. This scale is easy to use and can assess all joints, has a high degree of reliability and reproducibility. The score is interpreted as follows: 0 No increase in tone 1 slight increase in tone giving a catch when slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by the limb was moved in flexion or extension. 1+ slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout (ROM ) 2 more marked increase in tone but more marked increased in muscle tone through most limb easily flexed 3 considerable increase in tone, passive movement difficult 4 limb rigid in flexion or extension

    Time frame: Up to 7 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Mariola Lledó Amat
    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas 35016, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Mariola Lledó Amat, MSc · Contactmariola.lledo101@alu.ulpgc.es · +34 637 87 68 50
    • Raquel Medina-Ramírez, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Aníbal Báez-Suárez, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Adolfo Sancho-Francés., PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Li L, Scott CA, Rothwell PM; Oxford Vascular Study. Trends in Stroke Incidence in High-Income Countries in the 21st Century: Population-Based Study and Systematic Review. Stroke. 2020 May;51(5):1372-1380. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028484. Epub 2020 Mar 25. PubMed 32208842 ↗
  • McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A, Crichton S, Rudd AR, Forster A, Young J, Nazareth I, Silver LE, Rothwell PM, Wolfe CD. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1398-403. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.598839. Epub 2011 Mar 24. PubMed 21441153 ↗
  • Crichton SL, Bray BD, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;87(10):1091-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-313361. Epub 2016 Jul 22. PubMed 27451353 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05853952
Lead sponsor
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Responsible party
Aníbal Báez Suárez (Clinical Professor, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 11, 2023
Start date
Apr 24, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 24, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 23, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 5, 2026

Study contacts

Mariola Lledó Amat, MSc
Contact
mariola.lledo101@alu.ulpgc.es
+34 637 87 68 50
Mariola Lledó Amat, MSc
principal investigator · University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion