ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05841914DecodeVRLUpdated Jul 23, 2025

Multicentre Implementation and Validation of a Molecular Diagnostic for VitreoRetinal Lymphoma

An observational study in Vitreoretinal Lymphoma, sponsored by Vinodh Kakkassery, MD. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-23.

Sponsored by Vinodh Kakkassery, MD · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
220
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to gain new insights into the changes in proteins, genes and other molecular biological substances in the aqueous humour, vitreous humour, blood serum and, in rare cases, retina/choroid samples in patients with ocular lymphoma disease. The hope is that this will expand the understanding of the mechanisms of the disease and thus contribute to improved and simplified diagnosis and treatment strategies in the future. The aim is the inclusion of at least 220 patients during the study period. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • to evaluate the diagnostic quality of extended molecular diagnostics (based on standard work-up) of vitreous samples for the specific VitreoRetinalLymphoma (a type of ocular lymphoma disease) diagnosis in comparison to standard work-up alone.
  • To monitor VRL patients as part of regular tumour follow-up over a period of 24 months to determine the value of biomarkers with regard to treatment response and development of recurrence in the eye. Similarly, the vitritis patients are followed up by telephone every six months for a period of 24 months, during which questions of any interim occurrence of a VRL or other cancerous tumors are asked according to a defined catalogue of questions.
Read the detailed description

Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is a rare intraocular neoplasm that is considered a variant of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) and may manifest primarily or secondarily in the vitreous and retina. The distinction between vitritis/uveitis and VRL is clinically difficult and requires cytological examination of invasively obtained vitreous material for definitive diagnosis. Due to the time-consuming material collection and the clinical masquerade as vitritis, there are often significant delays in diagnosis. In addition, only a few centres have sufficient experience in the diagnosis and therapy of this rare lymphoma entity. The sensitivity of established tests (cytology, immunophenotyping, clonality analysis) on vitrectomy specimens is at most 70% for VRL. A standardised diagnostic procedure has not yet been defined.

This study aims to implement a network for standardised molecular analysis of VRL, to evaluate the impact of standardised molecular diagnostics on diagnostic quality prospectively through clinical follow-up.The network partners will prospectively send diagnostic vitreous samples from patients with suspected VRL, process them centrally in a standardised manner and subject them to multiparametric molecular diagnostics (mutation analysis and clonality detection using next generation sequencing, miRNA analysis). Due to the rarity of the disease, a recruitment period of 4 years is planned with the inclusion of at least 220 patients with suspected VRL, including 50 in whom VRL can ultimately be confirmed. At the time of surgery, the diagnostic chain (including type and duration of symptoms, clinical course up to vitrectomy) will be evaluated using questionnaires and a qualitative interview with stakeholders (patients, ophthalmologists, pathologists, oncologists). In order to validate the quality of molecular diagnostics and to evaluate the significance for the course of the disease (treatment failure, local recurrence, CNS involvement and recurrence), a prospective clinical documentation of the course of the disease with an observation period of 2 years for VRL patients is being carried out in cooperation with the CNS Lymphoma Working Group of the German Lymphoma Alliance.

Analogous to the VRL patients, the vitritis patients are asked by telephone every six months for two years whether they have been diagnosed with VRL or PCNSL. All VRL patients will be included in a clinical registry. Remaining biomaterial from vitreous bodies will be deposited in a central biobank for future research projects and biomarker establishment, independent of diagnosis.

The aim of the project is to implement a standardised and quality-assured molecular genetic analysis of VRL in specialised centres throughout Germany and thus to achieve an improved and more time-efficient diagnosis of this rare and aggressive disease. The network for the diagnosis of VRL and the clinical registry can also serve as a basis for the development of therapy studies in the future in cooperation with the CNS Lymphoma Working Group of the German Lymphoma Alliance, which is largely lacking in this entity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vitreoretinal Lymphoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Vitreoretinal lymphoma
  • primary CNS lymphoma
  • improved detection
  • molecular diagnostics
  • diagnostic standardisation
  • health services research
  • prospective study
03

In context

Intraocular Lymphoma

165 studies on the registry are indexed under Intraocular Lymphoma; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 220 is above the median of 64 across 20 observational studies indexed under Intraocular Lymphoma.

Browse Intraocular Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Vinodh Kakkassery, MD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with a clinical suspicion of vitreoretinal lymphoma

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical suspicion of the presence of VRL with indication for diagnostic vitrectomy. Clinical suspicion is based on the assessment of the treating physicians in the clinics participating in this study.
  • Age over 18 years.
  • Written to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic chemotherapy for lymphoma within 3 months prior to vitrectomy.
  • Cortisone use within 2 weeks before vitrectomy, macular oedema, posterior synechiae, rubeosis iridis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
220 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To implement a standardised diagnostic work-up of vitreous samples from patients with suspected VRL

    The diagnostic work-up would be from patients with suspected VRL including NGS-based mutation and B-cell clonality analysis and quantification of miRNAs 19b, 21 and 92 for the participating ophthalmology centres.

    Time frame: 6 years

  2. Rate of correct diagnosed VRL and vitritis with the use of extended molecular diagnostics versus standard work-up alone

    The evaluation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of extended molecular diagnostics (based on standard work-up) of vitreous samples for VRL diagnosis in comparison to standard work-up alone.

    Time frame: 6 years

  3. Rate of patients with VRL or vitritis within the follow up of 24 Months after diagnostics

    Follow-up of VRL patients during regular tumour follow-up over a period of 24 months to determine the predictive significance of the biomarkers with regard to therapy response, development of recurrence in the eye, second eye involvement as well as CNS involvement and recurrence. Similarly, the vitritis patients are followed up by telephone every six months for a period of 24 months, during which any interim occurrence of a VRL or a PCNSL as well as further questions are asked according to a defined catalogue of questions.

    Time frame: 24 Months for each patient, all in all a 6 year frame for all patients.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Establish a central VRL clinical registry

    A central VRL clinical registry should be established to facilitate the exchange of information. The registry will be established with the support of the German Lymphoma Alliance and Retina.net.

    Time frame: 6 years

  2. A Biobank of VRL and Vitritis from residual material

    Establishment of a residual material biobank (especially DNA and RNA) of VRL and the control group vitritis.

    Time frame: 6 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein
    Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein 23538, Germany
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 39 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 2, 2023
First posted
May 3, 2023
StartActual
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2028
Last update
Jul 23, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05841914
Lead sponsor
Vinodh Kakkassery, MD
Responsible party
Vinodh Kakkassery, MD (PD Dr. med, principal investigator, University of Luebeck) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 3, 2023
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 23, 2025

Study contacts

Liv Dollmann
Contact
liv.dollmann@uksh.de
+49451-500-50868
Vinodh Kakkassery, PD Dr.med.
study chair · University of Luebeck

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion