ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05825053ATTAINSUpdated Apr 24, 2023

Retaining Short-term Training Effects on Gait Adaptability in People With Stroke

An interventional study of Gait adaptability training and Home-based exercise training in Stroke, sponsored by Sint Maartenskliniek. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-24.

Sponsored by Sint Maartenskliniek · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: The majority of stroke survivors regain walking ability. However, the ability to adapt gait patterns to meet environmental demands remains impaired in a majority of people in the chronic phase after stroke. This impaired gait adaptability has a profound impact on activities of daily living and quality of life. Treatment targeting gait adaptability is therefore critical for safe and independent community ambulation in people with stroke. Augmented or virtual reality in rehabilitation programs can be used to train gait adaptability in a controlled situation. A few studies have evaluated gait adaptability training in people with stroke. Although results were promising, these studies did not include an adaptability-related outcome measure, or were limited to uncontrolled or small-scaled pilot studies. Moreover, it is unknown if beneficial training effects can be fostered for 1 year after completion of a training program. We evaluate the short-term effects of a 5-week gait adaptability training in an adequately powered, waiting-list controlled clinical trial [ref naar clin trial nummer]. In the current study, we focus on the retention of potentially beneficial effects of this 5 week gait adaptability training program. We will evaluate if short-term effects of gait adaptability training can be retained through single training sessions to boost performance, or by an home exercise program. We hypothesize that booster sessions and home-based exercise will both yield better retention of training effects at 1 year follow-up as compared to the control arm without an experimental intervention.

Objective: The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that retention of training-induced gains in gait adaptability can be fostered by providing booster sessions or by prescribing home-based training.

Study design: Explorative randomized study, comparing the effect of 3 1-hr booster training sessions against home-based exercise against no intervention on gait adaptability performance 1 year after completion of a 5-week gait adaptability training program.

Study population: Stroke patients in the chronic phase after stroke, who completed the 5-week gait adaptability training using the C-Mill and agreed to continue in this follow-up study. We expect this to be 50-75 participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 75 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Sint Maartenskliniek is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • > 6 months after first unilateral supratentorial stroke (chronic phase)
  • Able to walk at least 10 minutes independently
  • Initial involvement of the lower extremity after stroke.
  • Having completed (minimal 8/10 training sessions) the 5 week gait adaptability training program using the C-Mill

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other neurological or musculoskeletal disease affecting gait or balance (e.g. Parkinson's disease, knee osteoarthritis)
  • Contractures or spasticity requiring other treatment (e.g. botulinum toxin treatment) within the duration of the training period.
  • Severe cognitive or visuo-spatial impairments limiting comprehension of instructions or correct perception of the environments
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Booster group

    Participants assigned to the booster group will receive a three single training sessions 3 months apart targeting gait adaptability using the C-mill. Assessments will take place after giving informed consent which is indicated as the start of the study (baseline), 6 months and 12 months post-baseline.

    Behavioral: Gait adaptability training

  • Experimental
    Home-based exercise group

    Participants assigned to the home-based exercise group will receive a program for training at home aiming at a minimum training time of 60 minutes per week. Assessments will take place after giving informed consent which is indicated as the start of the study (baseline), 6 months and 12 months post-baseline

    Behavioral: Home-based exercise training

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Participants assigned to the control group will not follow any additional intervention other than the standard care they already receive for the year following the completion of the 5-week gait adaptability training using the C-Mill from the ATTAINS study. Assessments will take place after giving informed consent which is indicated as the start of the study(baseline), 6 months and 12 months post-baseline.

Interventions

  • BehavioralGait adaptability training

    Over a span of 1 year participants will receive 3 one hour, single sessions at 3, 6 and 9 months following baseline assessment, of gait adaptability training, using the C-mill (an instrumented treadmill with augmented reality). Several aspects of gait adaptability, such as obstacle avoidance, accelerating/decelerating and precision stepping, will be trained.

  • BehavioralHome-based exercise training

    Participants will receive tailored exercise through an online platform targeting gait adaptability. Participants are instructed to train at a minimum of 60 minutes per week, with a frequency of 2 sessions per week. Participants will be supported through tele-consultations on a monthly basis for the first 3 months and bi-monthly for the remaining time of the study. These consultations are focused on technical support, on ways to ensure training progression and to encourage adherence to the program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Walking Adaptability Ladder Test (WALT) score

    Measure of gait adaptability. An adapted version for adults of the Walking Adaptability Laddertest for Kids (WAL-K) to assess the ability to flexibly adjust the gait pattern during overground walking. Outcome is based on performance time and foot placement errors measured in seconds where a lower score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months post-baseline

  2. Emory Functional Ambulation Profile (EFAP) score

    Measure of gait adaptability. In this task the participants traverse a standardized 5m obstacle course. Outcome is time to perform the task measured in seconds where a lower score is a better outcome

    Time frame: 12 months post-baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lab-based walking adaptability test

    Measure of gait adaptability. Target stepping task using the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab (GRAIL) where participant must step on projected stepping stones as accurately as possible. Step width and step length between the stepping stones will vary.

    Time frame: 12 months post-baseline

  2. Balance performance

    Measure of gait stability, measured by the margin of stability (meter) and the center of mass excursion (meter), on treadmill walking with perturbations using the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab (GRAIL).

    Time frame: 12 months post-baseline

  3. Walking performance

    Measure of walking ability using the 10meter walktest, measured in seconds where a lower score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months post-baseline

  4. Balance confidence

    Evaluating balance confidence using the Activity Balance Scale, measured on a 0% - 100% scale, where a higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months post-baseline

  5. Daily life gait performance as assessed by gait quality

    Measured by inertial measurement units placed on both feet and the lower back. Analysis through cusomized algorythms.

    Time frame: 12 months post-baseline

  6. Daily life walking activity assessed by walking time per day

    Average time of walking during the day (minutes) measured in one week using the Activ8.

    Time frame: 12 months post-baseline

  7. Health-related quality of life

    Evaluating the disability and health-related quality of life after stroke using the Stroke Impact Scale mobility subscale, measure on a 5-point scale ("could not do at all = 1" - "not difficult at all = 5") where a higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months post-baseline

  8. Balance performance through MiniBESTest

    Measure of balance and gait stability using the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MiniBESTes). Tasks are score on a 3-point scale. Outcome is an average score ranging between 0 and 1 where a higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months post-baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kuijpers R, Smulders E, Groen BE, Smits-Engelsman BCM, Nijhuis-Van der Sanden MWG, Weerdesteyn V. Reliability and construct validity of the Walking Adaptability Ladder Test for Kids (WAL-K): a new clinical test for measuring walking adaptability in children. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Apr;44(8):1489-1497. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1802523. Epub 2020 Aug 10. PubMed 32776854 ↗
  • Tuijtelaars J, Roerdink M, Raijmakers B, Nollet F, Brehm MA. Polio survivors have poorer walking adaptability than healthy individuals. Gait Posture. 2021 Jun;87:143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.04.031. Epub 2021 Apr 21. PubMed 33915437 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2023; primary completion for Dec 2025, 32 months later.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 32 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 11, 2023
First posted
Apr 24, 2023
StartEst.
Apr 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 2025
Last update
Apr 24, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05825053
Lead sponsor
Sint Maartenskliniek
Collaborators
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 24, 2023
Start date
Apr 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2023

Study contacts

Marijne Nieuwelink, MSc
Contact
m.nieuwelink@maartenskliniek.nl
024-3272731
Vivian Weerdesteyn, Prof. dr.
principal investigator · Sint Maartenskliniek

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion