ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT058199312SLAUpdated May 12, 2026

Breathing With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

An interventional study of Mechanical In-Exsufflator treatment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-12.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2023; still recruiting 3 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to evaluate the effect of mechanical insufflator-exsufflator on the respiratory functions of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients evaluated via peak expiratory flow on cough (PEFC) measurements. The evolution of their PEFC is monitored to see if the curative management can have a positive impact on the latter.

Read the detailed description

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a rare neurodegenerative pathology without curative treatment at present, the outcome is fatal after 3 to 5 years of evolution on average. The disease results in progressive paralysis of the muscles involved in voluntary motricity (progressive and intricate impairment of locomotor, phonation and swallowing capacities as well as ventilatory function). In France, the management of ALS is based on a diversified multidisciplinary follow-up (physiotherapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy, neuropsychology) in the ALS Reference Center in conjunction with the city care networks. It is centered on the evaluation, and the early compensation of the various symptoms, especially the respiratory problems.

Thus, this study aims to evaluate the effect of mechanical insufflator-exsufflator on the respiratory functions of these patients, evaluated via cough peak expiratory flow measurements (CPEF).

The study is conducted in collaboration with the physiotherapists of each patient enrolled, to evaluate the respiratory function by peak expiratory flow on cough (PEFC) after 4 weeks of treatment with Mechanical In-Exsufflator (MIE) (3 weekly sessions for two weeks, then one daily session for 2 weeks) in ALS patients presenting with a poorly effective cough (PEFC between 160 and 255 L/min) and having an indication of punctual MIE.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

  • Mechanical In-Exsufflator
  • Physiotherapy
  • Cough
  • peak expiratory flow on cough
03

In context

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

978 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; 277 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is close to the median of 38 across 662 interventional studies indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Browse Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Toulouse is the lead sponsor of 807 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed ALS categorized as probable or certain according to the revised Awaji-Shima criteria [27].
  • ALS of spinal, bulbar or respiratory forms
  • Peak Flow measure between 160 and 255 L/min (recommendation of MIE in case of congestion, with the possibility of daily sessions)
  • Patient who has not benefited from treatment by MIE in the past year (less than 10 sessions in total)
  • Patient able to use the MIE and perform the collection, or having a caregiver able to help
  • Patient receiving physiotherapist treatment greater than or equal to twice a week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric () or cognitive disorders incompatible with participation in the study
  • to the use of an MIE (pneumothorax for example)
  • Insufficient level in French for understanding the study and completing the questionnaires
  • Current or past participation in another innovative research or care program relating to respiratory functions
  • Emergency situation for which the MIE must be set up within less than a week

Exclusion during the study :

  • Appearance of a serious contraindication to the practice of MIE during the study (for example rib fracture during a fall)
  • Patient's physiotherapist refusing to do the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mechanical In-Exsufflator treatment

    Device: Mechanical In-Exsufflator treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceMechanical In-Exsufflator treatment

    The Mechanical In-Exsufflator (MIE) is a device that alternately inhales and exhales air and amplifies the respiratory cycles in flow and pressure. 15 breathing cycles (about 3 minutes) are recommended each day. Patients will practice the MIE daily independently and/or carried out by his physiotherapist (PT) during PT sessions. The MIE is prescribed by the neurologist or pulmonologist and is covered by social security in France. It is gifted by an external service provider. The Peak-Flow Cough is considered as the standardized score retaining the best of 3 consecutive measurements by Peak-Flow, a small portable device for personal use, which measures the maximum expiratory flow reached by the patient at the moment when the breath is most powerful. The patient is his own control. At baseline, the patient will be treated as usual. He will be asked to read the Peak-Flow Cough measures. The PT will also perform the Peak flow measurement at each patient visit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. cough peak expiratory flow evolution

    evolution of respiratory function by peak expiratory flow on cough (PEFC) after 4 weeks of treatment with Mechanical In-Exsufflator (3 weekly sessions for two weeks then one daily session for 2 weeks) in ALS patients presenting with a poorly effective cough (Cough Peak Expiratory Flow between 160 and 255) and having an indication of punctual MIE. Ratio between the PEFC 4 weeks post treatment initiation and PEFC at baseline can show decrease in respiratory function if \<1 ; increase in respiratory functions if \>1 and a conservation of respiratory function if = 1. A PEFC remaining within 10% of its initial value (rounded to the nearest ten) is considered unmodified

    Time frame: 4 weeks post treatment initiation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • SLA Center - Purpan University Hospital Toulouse, FRANCE
    Toulouse, Occitanie 31000, France
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 40 months after the start.

Of 134 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 40 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 154 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 6, 2023
First posted
Apr 19, 2023
StartActual
Aug 29, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
May 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05819931
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 19, 2023
Start date
Aug 29, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 12, 2026

Study contacts

Thierry LAGARDE, PT
Contact
lagarde.t@chu-toulouse.fr
+33561775570
Floriane LLORENS
Contact
llorens.fl@chu-toulouse.fr
Thierry Lagarde
principal investigator · University Hospital, Toulouse

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion