An interventional study of Interprofessional education in Medical Students, sponsored by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University. Status unknown at 1 site in Poland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-18.
Sponsored by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Due to the growing role of medical simulation in the education of medical students and the development of cooperation in interdisciplinary teams in the health care sector, a study was designed to examine the relationship between the competences and resources of students and the role of education through simulation classes based on the development of technical and in cooperation with specialists in these fields. Researchers want to focus on students' levels of stress and anxiety, coping strategies, and self-efficacy. An important element will be the self-assessment of students on the level of their non-technical competences.
Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Interprofessional education
The study will be conducted among students of the Krakow Academy. The experimental group will consist of 35 students participating in the Interdisciplinary Circle of Medical Simulation from the following faculties: medicine, nursing and medical rescue. Students will be divided into 7 interprofessional teams, in which they will take classes planned for small groups.
Evaluation of the ongoing interprofessional education
1. A self - report questionnaire including a socio-demographic data sheet and questions regarding the motivation for choosing the field of study, as well as a form for the ongoing evaluation of Interdisciplinary Club classes to be completed before and after classes.
Time frame: 10 months
Evaluation of the impact of interprofessional education on soft-skill development
1. Self-assessment form in the field of soft skills - own study, which contains 17 statements describing soft skills in an interprofessional team. Respondents assess their development on a five-point Likert scale, where "1" means "I completely disagree" and "5" - "I completely agree".
Time frame: 10 months
Evaluation of the impact of interprofessional education using the simulation method on self-efficacy.
1. General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) with the total score calculated by finding the sum of all the items and ranges between 10 and 40, with higher score indicating more self-efficacy.
Time frame: 10 months
Evaluation of the impact of interprofessional education using the simulation method on student stress level.
A 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) for assessing how often a respondent thought and felt in the given way in the last month using a five-point Likert scale. The result of the measurement is the stress severity index. The PSS score is obtained by summing across all items. Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress.
Time frame: 10 month
Evaluation of the impact of interprofessional education using the simulation method on stress coping.
The Stress Coping Inventory (Mini COPE). The respondent determines how often he/she acts in the described way when experiencing a stressful situation using a four-point Likert scale (0-I almost never do that, 1-I rarely do that, 2-I often do that, 3-I almost always do that). Every statement is assigned to one of 14 stress-coping categories.
Time frame: 10 month
Evaluation of the impact of interprofessional education using the simulation method on perception of medical professions.
Word Cloud - own study - a form used to assess the mutual perception of medical professions in an interprofessional team. The respondents choose five terms from the proposed word database.
Time frame: 10 month
Evaluation of the impact of interprofessional education using the simulation method on students anxiety.
A 20-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Time frame: 10 month
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University