CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05812365Updated Jul 25, 2024

Best End-Expiratory and Driving-pressure for Individualized Flow Controlled Ventilation in Patients With COPD

An observational study in COPD, Ventilator Lung and Anesthesia, sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-25.

Sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a significantly increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Protective ventilation of the lungs could reduce the rate of PPC in patients with COPD. It has been suggested that flow controlled ventilation (FCV) may be less invasive and more protective to the lungs than conventional ventilation in patients with COPD.

The primary aim of this study is to determine a optimal individual ventilation setting for FCV in ten participants with COPD.

Read the detailed description

The estimated worldwide chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) mean prevalence is 13.1%. In 2015, 3.2 million people died from COPD worldwide, and estimates show that COPD will be the third leading cause of death in 2030. Patients with COPD are at high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). It has been proposed that FCV might be less-invasive and more protective for the lungs than conventional ventilation in patients with COPD. The pathophysiology of COPD is multifactorial, with the collapse of the central airways having a major impact on the symptoms. Minimizing the expiratory flow could prevent this airway pathology, and thus be beneficial in the ventilation of patients with COPD.

In the operation theater participants will be ventilated with flow controlled ventilation (FCV). Arterial blood gas analysis and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) will be measured.

The aim of the study is to determine the best end-expiratory pressure and driving pressure (assessed after anesthesia induction based on compliance and EIT parameters).

02

Conditions studied

  • COPD
  • Ventilator Lung
  • Anesthesia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf is the lead sponsor of 403 studies on the registry; 83 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with verified COPD, scheduled for operations in general anesthesia, who present in the preassessment clinic of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf during the study recruitment period, will be screened for eligibility.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing surgery with endotracheal intubation
  • Age ≥ 18
  • Verified COPD (preoperative spirometry)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant woman
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Surgery that might interfere with EIT measurement
  • Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Best end-expiratory pressure

    Best end-expiratory pressure (mbar), defined as the end-expiratory pressure associated with the best compliance, best tradeoff between alveolar collapse and hyper distension (EIT)

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal Intubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Best driving pressure

    Best driving pressure (peek pressure - end-expiratory pressure in mbar) associated with the best compliance, best tradeoff between alveolar collapse and hyper distension (EIT)

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  2. Dissipated energy

    Calculated dissipated energy per liter of gas ventilated (J) during ventilation.

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  3. Required minute volume to maintain carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2) level

    The minute volume (L/min) of the ventilator will be adjusted to maintain the preoperative baseline pCO2 level (blood gas analysis).

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  4. Applied mechanical power

    Calculated applied mechanical power during ventilation (J/min)

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  5. Ventilation distribution

    Expressed as the percentage of total pulmonary ventilation through each of the regions-of-interest, total 100%.

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  6. Delta Z

    Measured variation of impedance (arbitrary units) by electrical impedance tomography.

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  7. Delta end-expiratory lung impedance

    Variation of impedance plethysmography at end-expiration measured by electrical impedance tomography.

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  8. Distribution of regional tidal ventilation

    Distribution of regional tidal ventilation will be determined as the relation of regional ΔZ/total ΔZ (expressed in percentage), measured by electrical impedance tomography.

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  9. Regional lung compliance

    Calculated by electrical impedance tomography (ml/cm H2O)

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  10. Center of Ventilation

    Variations of the pulmonary ventilation distribution in the ventral-dorsal and left-right direction measured by electrical impedance tomography.

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  11. Global inhomogeneity index

    Impedance variations of each pixel between the end of inspiration and expiration measured by electrical impedance tomography.

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  12. arterial oxygen partial pressure (paO2)

    Measured by blood gas analysis (mmHg)

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  13. carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2)

    Measured by blood gas analysis (mmHg)

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  14. Horovitz quotient

    Ratio of PaO2 (mmHg) and the fraction of oxygen of the inhaled air (FiO2).

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  15. Base excess

    Measured by blood gas analysis (mmol/l)

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  16. potential of hydrogen (pH)

    Measured by blood gas analysis

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  17. Resistance

    Pressure change per flow change measured by the ventilator (kPa\*s/l).

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  18. tidal volume

    Measure by ventilator (ml)

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  19. Peak inspiratory pressure

    Maximum pressure during the inspiration measured by the ventilator (mbar).

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  20. Respiratory rate

    Measured by the ventilator (1/min)

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

  21. End-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2)

    End-tidal carbon dioxide level measured by the ventilator (mmHg).

    Time frame: 1 hour after tracheal intubation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Blanco I, Diego I, Bueno P, Casas-Maldonado F, Miravitlles M. Geographic distribution of COPD prevalence in the world displayed by Geographic Information System maps. Eur Respir J. 2019 Jul 18;54(1):1900610. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00610-2019. Print 2019 Jul. No abstract available. PubMed 31000678 ↗
  • GBD 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Sep;5(9):691-706. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30293-X. Epub 2017 Aug 16. Erratum In: Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Oct;5(10):e30. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30336-3. PubMed 28822787 ↗
  • Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006 Nov;3(11):e442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442. PubMed 17132052 ↗
  • Dankert A, Neumann-Schirmbeck B, Dohrmann T, Greiwe G, Plumer L, Loser B, Sehner S, Zollner C, Petzoldt M. Preoperative Spirometry in Patients With Known or Suspected Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Undergoing Major Surgery: The Prospective Observational PREDICT Study. Anesth Analg. 2023 Oct 1;137(4):806-818. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006235. Epub 2022 Nov 1. PubMed 36730893 ↗
  • Tsuboi N, Tsuboi K, Nosaka N, Nishimura N, Nakagawa S. The Ventilatory Strategy to Minimize Expiratory Flow Rate in Ventilated Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Feb 12;16:301-304. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S296343. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33603356 ↗
  • Barnes T, van Asseldonk D, Enk D. Minimisation of dissipated energy in the airways during mechanical ventilation by using constant inspiratory and expiratory flows - Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV). Med Hypotheses. 2018 Dec;121:167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.09.038. Epub 2018 Sep 24. PubMed 30396474 ↗
  • Bauer M, Opitz A, Filser J, Jansen H, Meffert RH, Germer CT, Roewer N, Muellenbach RM, Kredel M. Perioperative redistribution of regional ventilation and pulmonary function: a prospective observational study in two cohorts of patients at risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jul 27;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0805-8. PubMed 31351452 ↗
  • Borges JB, Cronin JN, Crockett DC, Hedenstierna G, Larsson A, Formenti F. Real-time effects of PEEP and tidal volume on regional ventilation and perfusion in experimental lung injury. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Feb 21;8(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-0298-2. PubMed 32086632 ↗
  • Dankert A, Dohrmann T, Loser B, Zapf A, Zollner C, Petzoldt M. Pulmonary Function Tests for the Prediction of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022 Feb 18;119(7):99-106. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0074. PubMed 34939921 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05812365
Lead sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Collaborators
Ventinova Medical, Eindhoven, Netherlands, Timple SA, Rua Simao Álvares 356 Conj. 41,42 e 51 - Pinheiros, Sao Paulo (Brasilien)
Responsible party
André Dankert, MD (Principal Investigator, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 13, 2023
Start date
Jul 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 24, 2024
Completion
Jul 24, 2024
Last update
Jul 25, 2024

Study contacts

André Dankert, MD
principal investigator · Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Martin Petzoldt, MD
principal investigator · Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion