ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05810480PIONEERUpdated Jul 15, 2026

PredIcting sterOid depeNdEnt livEr injuRy With Polyreactive Immunoglobulin G

An observational study in Autoimmune Hepatitis and Autoimmune Liver Disease, sponsored by Hannover Medical School. Recruiting at 6 sites in Germany. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-15.

Sponsored by Hannover Medical School · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2023; still recruiting 3 years 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators identified polyreactive immunoglobulin G (pIgG) in adults (published in Hepatology: https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.32134) and children (in preparation). Quantification of these pIgG using a "home-made" ELISA facilitates the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) as compared to non-AIH liver diseases and healthy controls. Positivity for pIgG was independent from ANA/SMA positivity and equally diagnostic for AIH even when conventional autoantibodies (ANA/SMA/SLA/LKM) were negative.

Additionally, the frequency of pIgG was lower than conventional autoantibodies (ANA, SMA) in vaccinia/drug associated severe liver injury in a retrospective multicenter study after Covid-19 vaccination (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100605).

Aims of the study The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic capacity of pIgG to predict AIH in comparison to other liver diseases prospectively. To avoid diagnostic inaccuracy between AIH with long-term need for an immunosuppression and drug induced liver injury with autoimmune features, which can be indistinguishable from AIH at baseline and which has a very low relapse rate after a short steroid course, a follow-up after six months is obligatory for inclusion.

Therefore, the investigators will collect one serum sample from every patient (without immunosuppressive treatment) that presents to the respective hospital for evaluation of liver disease by liver biopsy within one year after initiation of the study and that provided written informed consent. Follow-up for evaluation of steroid dependency at six months after diagnosis is obligatory.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autoimmune Hepatitis
  • Autoimmune Liver Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hepatitis, Autoimmune

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis, Autoimmune; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 273 across 36 observational studies indexed under Hepatitis, Autoimmune.

Browse Hepatitis, Autoimmune studies →

Lead sponsor

Hannover Medical School is the lead sponsor of 202 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Any patient that presents to the respective hospital for evaluation of a so far unknown-liver disease and consents is eligible if the treating physician orders a liver biopsy for the diagnostic evaluation of the liver disease. Patients are not eligible if a liver biopsy is performed for staging or grading of an already known liver disease or if the patient is treated with immunosuppressive drugs at the time of the liver biopsy.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnostic liver for the work-up of any liver disease
  • Definition of any liver disease according to current societal guidelines

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing at the liver or prior to the liver biopsy
  • Liver biopsies for the grading or staging of an already known liver disease (e.g. non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), /D Virus Infections (HBV/HDV Infection), …)

    • known liver disease
    • missing
    • patients or caregivers who can not provide informed consent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Autoimmune Hepatitis

    This group includes patients with a diagnosis of Autoimmune Hepatitis according to the simplified diagnostic criteria by Hennes et al. made by the local treating physician. The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis additionally requires steroid dependency \> six months for this study to discriminate Autoimmune Hepatitis from autoimmune like drug-induced liver injury (DILI) which are hard to discriminate at diagnosis and with the latter often being treating with a short course of corticosteroids less than six months. One serum sample will be stored for anonymized evaluation of serum autoantibodies

    Diagnostic Test: polyreactive immunoglobulin G

  • non-autoimmune hepatitis liver disease

    This group includes patients with a diagnosis of any non-viral liver disease that is not autoimmune hepatitis and whose diagnosis necessitated a diagnostic liver biopsy in the work-up of the liver disease for local care. One serum sample will be stored for anonymized evaluation of serum autoantibodies

    Diagnostic Test: polyreactive immunoglobulin G

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testpolyreactive immunoglobulin G

    Polyreactive immunoglobulin G will be tested centralized in Hannover as published (Taubert, Engel et al., Hepatology, 2022). The current standard diagnostic autoantibodies (e.g. ANA, anti-SMA, anti-LKM, anti-LC1, anti-SLA/L) will be tested centrally in Hannover according to current guidelines.

    Also known as: Conventional diagnostic autoantibodies

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of new simplified pIgG AIH Score

    Autoimmune serology will be substituted by pIgG in the 2021 simplified AIH Score. Sensitivity of the new score will be compared to the old score, primarily for non-inferiority and second for superiority if non-inferiority was met.

    Time frame: Assessment of steroid dependency at six months after enrollment

  2. Specificty of pIgG simplified AIH Score

    Autoimmune serology will be substituted by pIgG in the 2021 simplified AIH Score. Sensitivity of the new score will be compared to the old score, primarily for non-inferiority and second for superiority if non-inferiority was met.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic discrimination between AIH and DILI by polyreactive IgG

    Time frame: At enrollment

  2. Prediction of steroid dependent hepatitis by any other autoantibody

    Prediction of steroid dependent hepatitis by any other elevated conventional autoantibody according to current guidelines (European Association for the study of the liver: EASL, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases: AASLD)

    Time frame: Assessment of steroid dependency at six months after enrollment

  3. Age-dependency of autoantibodies

    Presence of autoantibodies will be descriptively evaluated with regard to age of the patients as currently it is proposed that lower antibody titers/levels are diagnostic in children (dependent on age) than in adults

    Time frame: Assessment of autoantibodies at baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Concordance of different testing methods for autoantibodies

    Different methodology to assess presence of autoantibodies (e.g. ELISA, Immunofluorescence on tissue sections) will be tested head-to-head for their diagnostic capacity

    Time frame: At enrollment

07

Study locations

1 of 6 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Taubert R, Engel B, Diestelhorst J, Hupa-Breier KL, Behrendt P, Baerlecken NT, Suhs KW, Janik MK, Zachou K, Sebode M, Schramm C, Londono MC, Habes S; UK-AIH Consortium; Oo YH, Lalanne C, Pape S, Schubert M, Hust M, Dubel S, Thevis M, Jonigk D, Beimdiek J, Buettner FFR, Drenth JPH, Muratori L, Adams DH, Dyson JK, Renand A, Graupera I, Lohse AW, Dalekos GN, Milkiewicz P, Stangel M, Maasoumy B, Witte T, Wedemeyer H, Manns MP, Jaeckel E. Quantification of polyreactive immunoglobulin G facilitates the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology. 2022 Jan;75(1):13-27. doi: 10.1002/hep.32134. Epub 2021 Dec 5. PubMed 34473365 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD are not shared with collaborators. Data, in general, is only provided anonymized by contributing centers.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2028, 61 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 28, 2023
First posted
Apr 12, 2023
StartActual
Jun 6, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2028
CompletionEst.
Jan 2029
Last update
Jul 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05810480
Responsible party
Engel, Bastian Dr. (Principal Investigator, Hannover Medical School) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 12, 2023
Start date
Jun 6, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 15, 2026

Study contacts

Bastian Engel, Dr.
Contact
Engel.Bastian@mh-hannover.de
+49 511 532 6766
Richard Taubert, Dr.
Contact
Taubert.Richard@mh-hannover.de
+49 511 532 6766
Bastian Engel, Dr.
principal investigator · Hannover Medical School
Richard Taubert, Dr.
principal investigator · Hannover Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion