ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05809037Updated Apr 12, 2023

Evaluation of Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Functional Status in Ischemic Stroke

An interventional study of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and Sham stimulation in Stroke, Ischemic, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis;Poststroke/CVA, sponsored by Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-12.

Sponsored by Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2023), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, the effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with right and left hemiparesis will be compared with each other and with the sham application.

Read the detailed description

This prospective study will include 80 participants with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke who meet the inclusion criteria. In addition to the conventional rehabilitation program, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation will be applied to the participants through the left ear with the Vagustim™-Ear tens electrode. As a vagus stimulation protocol, 10 sessions, 30 minutes, noninvasive auricular stimulation will be applied, stimulation frequency is 10 Hz, the pulse width is 300 µs, biphasic. In the study, sham vagus nerve stimulation (0 mA) will be applied to the participants in the control group. The study will be completed when the evaluation of the participants is made in the 1st and 3rd months after the last intervention. The upper extremity functions of the patients participating in the study were determined by Fugl-Meyer upper extremity test and box and block test, upper and lower extremity spasticities by modified Ashworth scale, and sleep quality by Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Quality of life will be evaluated with the stroke-specific quality of life scale, balance functions with the Berg balance test, dependency levels in daily activities with the Barthel index, and sympathetic dysfunctions with COMPASS-31. Participants' blood pressure and pulse values will be evaluated before and after each session.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Ischemic
  • Hemiplegia
  • Hemiparesis;Poststroke/CVA
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,653 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 936 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 120 across 1,799 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • History of subacute-chronic ischemic stroke (3-12 months)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral or unilateral previous injury to the vagus nerve (eg injury during carotid endarterectomy).
  • Severe depression (Beck Depression Scale > 29)
  • Current use of any other stimulation device, such as a pacemaker or other neurostimulator; current use of any other investigational device or drug.
  • Medical or mental instability (diagnosis of personality disorder, psychosis, or substance abuse) that would prevent the subject from following the protocol timeline.
  • Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study period.
  • Botox injections or hemiplegia rehabilitation within 6 months before treatment.
  • Having a history of hemorrhagic stroke
  • Presence of ongoing dysphagia or aspiration difficulties.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active Stimulation for right hemiparesis patients

    Active non-invasive transauricular vagus nerve stimulation over left ear in post-stroke right hemiparesis

    Device: transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation for right hemiparesis patients

    Sham non-invasive transauricular vagus nerve stimulation over left ear in post-stroke right hemiparesis

    Device: Sham stimulation

  • Active comparator
    Active Stimulation for left hemiparesis patients

    Active non-invasive transauricular vagus nerve stimulation over left ear in post-stroke left hemiparesis

    Device: transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation for left hemiparesis patients

    Sham non-invasive transauricular vagus nerve stimulation over left ear in post-stroke left hemiparesis

    Device: Sham stimulation

Interventions

  • Devicetranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

    In addition to the conventional rehabilitation program, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation will be applied to the participants through the left ear with the Vagustim™-Ear tens electrode. As a vagus stimulation protocol, 10 sessions, 30 minutes, noninvasive auricular stimulation will be applied, stimulation frequency is 10 Hz, pulse width is 300 µs, and biphasic.

  • DeviceSham stimulation

    In addition to the conventional rehabilitation program, sham vagus nerve stimulation (0 mA) will be applied to the participants in the control group. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation will be applied to the participants through the left ear with the Vagustim™-Ear tens electrode. As a vagus stimulation protocol, 10 sessions, 30 minutes, and noninvasive auricular stimulation will be applied.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity

    It is considered as gold standard and is the only impairment level measure recommended for stroke trials. It consists of 30 items assessing motor function and 3 items assessing reflex function. The score most applicable to task performance is given from "0, inability," "1, beginning ability," to "2, normal" (total score range, 0-66).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity at 4 weeks and 12 weeks

  2. Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale

    The Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale assesses health-related quality of life specific to stroke survivors. 49 questions under 12 subscales. Scores range from 49-245. Higher scores indicate better functioning.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale at 4 weeks and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Barthel Index

    Barthel Index is used to measure the disability experienced by the patient in performing activities of daily living. It comprises 10 items regarding activities of daily living and mobility and assesses feeding, transfer from wheelchair to bed and back, self-care, bathing, walking, climbing stairs, dressing, and bladder and bowel continence. Scoring is based on whether the patient requires help or not in performing any of the above mentioned activities. Proposed guidelines for interpreting Barthel scores are that scores of 0-20 indicate "total" dependency, 21-60 indicate "severe" dependency, 61-90 indicate "moderate" dependency, and 91-99 indicates "slight" dependency.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Barthel Index at 4 weeks and 12 weeks

  2. Modified Ashworth Scale

    Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is used to assess spasticity. Scoring: 0: No increase in tone; 1: slight increase in tone giving a catch when slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by the limb was moved in flexion or extension; 1+: slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout (ROM ); 2: more marked increase in tone but more marked increased in muscle tone through most limb easily flexed; 3: considerable increase in tone, passive movement difficult and, 4: limb rigid in flexion or extension

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 4 weeks and 12 weeks

  3. Berg Balance Test

    Berg Balance Test is consisting of 14 items and measures the ability of individuals to maintain balance while performing functional tasks. Each task is scored from 0 (cannot perform independently) to 4 (stated best performance). 0-20 points are interpreted as high risk of falling, between 21-40 points as medium risk of falling, and between 41-56 points as low risk.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Berg Balance Test at 4 weeks and 12 weeks

  4. Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS-31)

    The test has 6 domains looking at autonomic symptoms: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder and pupillomotor. The six domain scores sum to a total COMPASS 31 score of 0 to 100, and a higher COMPASS 31 score indicates more severe autonomic symptoms.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Composite Autonomic Symptom Score at 4 weeks and 12 weeks

  5. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 4 weeks and 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and research Hospital
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2023, 9 months after the start.

Of 569 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ischemic Stroke, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 652 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 30, 2023
First posted
Apr 12, 2023
StartActual
Mar 27, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 27, 2023
CompletionEst.
Mar 27, 2024
Last update
Apr 12, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 12, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05809037
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 12, 2023
Start date
Mar 27, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 27, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 27, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 12, 2023

Study contacts

Selim Sezikli, MD
Contact
selimsezikli@hotmail.com
+902124965000
Selim Sezikli, MD
principal investigator · Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion