ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05804045Updated May 4, 2026Results posted

Study of Pimicotinib (ABSK021) for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (MANEUVER)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Pimicotinib(ABSK021) and Placebo in Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor, Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis and Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath, sponsored by Abbisko Therapeutics Co, Ltd. Active, not recruiting at 40 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-04.

Primary conditionSynovitis, Pigmented VillonodularRegistry: Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon SheathReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular, a narrower term within Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Abbisko Therapeutics Co, Ltd (part of Abbisko Cayman Limited) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
94
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of Pimicotinib (ABSK021) in patients with Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Whether the Pimicotinib(ABSK021) works well in patients with TGCT.
  • Whether the Pimicotinib(ABSK021) is safe in patients with TGCT.

Participants will be asked to complete the study procedures:

  • Receive the administration of Pimicotinib(ABSK021) or placebo (a placebo is a look-alike substance that contains no active drug) about 24 weeks in study part 1.
  • Receive the administration of Pimicotinib(ABSK021) about 24 weeks in study part 2.
  • Receive the administration of Pimicotinib(ABSK021) till study end in study part 3.
  • Complete the study procedures speficied in the protocol, which is guided by researchers.
Read the detailed description

This study consists of part 1 and part 2. Part 1 is a double-blind phase, eligible patients will be randomized to Pimicotinib(ABSK021) treatment group or matching placebo group and will receive Pimicotinib(ABSK021) or matching placebo until completion of Part 1.

Part 2 is an open-label treatment phase, and all patients entering this phase will receive open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) until completion of 24 weeks of dosing or withdrawal from the study.

Part 3 is an open-label extension treatment phase, and patients who completed the part 2 and continuted to be eligible, will go to the Part 3. Patients will receive the open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) until all patients withdraw from the study, or the sponsor decides to terminate the study, whichever occurs first.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
  • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
  • Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath

Browse trials for

03

In context

Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular Reclassified

20 studies on the registry are indexed under Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 94 is above the median of 36 across 17 interventional studies indexed under Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular.

Browse Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular studies →

Lead sponsor

Abbisko Therapeutics Co, Ltd is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Compared within Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients should understand the study procedures and sign the form prior to screening.
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • A confirmed TGCT with unresectable.
  • as defined by 1.1, and with at least one lesion of ≥ 2 cm.
  • Stable prescription of analgesic regimen for patients with an analgesic need.
  • Participants should complete stiffness and pain scales during the screening period, and symptomatic disease because of active TGCT should meet minimum requirements as outlined in study protocol.
  • PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status) of 0 or 1.
  • Adequate organ function and bone marrow function.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or to any components of the drug product.
  • Previous treatment with highly selective inhibitors targeting CSF-1/CSF-1R. Previous therapy with imatinib and nilotinib is allowed.
  • Known additional that required active treatment and may affect the patient's participation in the study or affect the outcome of the study as assessed by the Investigator.
  • Known TGCT.
  • Significant concomitant arthropathy in the affected joint, serious disease, uncontrolled infection.
  • Known MRI .
  • Has factors that significantly affected the absorption of oral drug.
  • Major surgery or previous anti-tumor therapy for TGCT within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Concomitant use of strong CYP inhibitors or inducers as outlined in study protocol.
  • Impaired cardiac function or cardiac disease.
  • Known active , active , active , or known active tuberculosis.
  • Known active liver or biliary disease, or other diseases that may lead to abnormal liver function test results during the study.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • males or non-surgically sterilized female patients must agree to use effective methods of during the study.
  • Any other clinically significant comorbidities, which in the judgment of the Investigator, could compromise compliance with the protocol, interfere with the interpretation of study results, or predispose the patient to safety risks.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
94 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)/ Pimicotinib(ABSK021)

    Participants receive the blinded treatment of ABSK021 for 24 weeks in Part 1 and continue on the open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) in Part 2 and Part 3.

    Drug: Pimicotinib(ABSK021)

  • Placebo comparator
    Part 1- Placebo/ Pimicotinib(ABSK021)

    Participants receive the blinded treatment of matching placebo for 24 weeks in Part 1 and have option to receive the open-label Pimicotinib(ABSK021) in Part 2.

    Drug: Pimicotinib(ABSK021) · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Assessed by central read using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (Version 1.1)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 25

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Tumor Volumn Score (TVS)

    TVS is a semi-quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. ORR was the percentage of participants who achieved either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by Blinded Independent Review Committee using TVS.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 25

  2. Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (ROM) at Week 25

    Presented here is the change from baseline in ROM to Week 25. Measurement of the affected and contralateral, non-affected joint was assessed by goniometer and measured in degrees. At baseline, the motion with the smallest relative ROM value (worst) was identified, and this motion was used for evaluating the change in relative ROM subsequently. The affected joint measurement was used to derive a relative ROM based on the measurement relative to reference standard value provided by the American Medical Association. Relative ROM is expressed in percent: 100 x (joint ROM measure)/(reference ROM standard).

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 25

  3. Change From Baseline in the Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 25

    The Worst Stiffness NRS is a single question that asks the participant to assess their worst stiffness in the last 24 hours. Participants rate their worst stiffness on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "no stiffness" and 10 is "worst imaginable." Lower scores represented better level of stiffness.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 25

  4. Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS Score at Week 25

    Participants reported responses to the BPI Worst Pain NRS. The BPI Worst Pain NRS ranged from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine."

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 25

  5. Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 25

    All participants were asked 11 or 13 questions from the PROMIS-PF item bank. The questions used one of two 5-point verbal rating scales: either 1 = "unable to do", 2 = "with much difficulty", 3 = "with some difficulty", 4 = "with a little difficulty", and 5 = "without any difficulty"; or 1 = "cannot do", 2 = "quite a lot", 3 = "somewhat", 4 = "very little", and 5 = "not at all." The T-score rescales the total raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore, a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. The T-score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better physical function status.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 25

07

Results

Posted May 4, 2026

Participant flow

Week 1 to Week 24
Participant flow — Week 1 to Week 24
MilestonePart 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo, Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)
Started6331
Completed5929
Not completed42
Week 25 to Week 48
Participant flow — Week 25 to Week 48
MilestonePart 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo, Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)
Started5231
Completed2811
Not completed2420
Week 49 to End of Study
Participant flow — Week 49 to End of Study
MilestonePart 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo, Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)
Started2311
Completed00
Not completed2311

Outcome measures

PrimaryObjective Response Rate (ORR)

Assessed by central read using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (Version 1.1)

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 25
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Percentage of participantsPart 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo
Objective Response Rate (ORR)54.0 (40.9 to 66.6)3.2 (0.1 to 16.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Part 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021) vs Part 1- Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = <0.0001 · Risk difference (rd): 50.7
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per Tumor Volumn Score (TVS)

TVS is a semi-quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. ORR was the percentage of participants who achieved either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by Blinded Independent Review Committee using TVS.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 25
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Tumor Volumn Score (TVS)
Percentage of participantsPart 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Tumor Volumn Score (TVS)61.9 (48.8 to 73.9)3.2 (0.1 to 16.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Part 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021) vs Part 1- Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = <0.0001 · Risk difference (rd): 58.7 · 95% CI 40.8 to 70.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (ROM) at Week 25

Presented here is the change from baseline in ROM to Week 25. Measurement of the affected and contralateral, non-affected joint was assessed by goniometer and measured in degrees. At baseline, the motion with the smallest relative ROM value (worst) was identified, and this motion was used for evaluating the change in relative ROM subsequently. The affected joint measurement was used to derive a relative ROM based on the measurement relative to reference standard value provided by the American Medical Association. Relative ROM is expressed in percent: 100 x (joint ROM measure)/(reference ROM standard).

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent of range of motion
Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (ROM) at Week 25
Percent of range of motionPart 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo
Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (ROM) at Week 2515.64 (10.37 to 20.91)-0.07 (-7.02 to 6.88)
Statistical analysis
  • Part 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021) vs Part 1- Placebo · Mixed model repeated measures · p = 0.0003 · Least square mean difference: 15.72 · 95% CI 7.33 to 24.10
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 25

The Worst Stiffness NRS is a single question that asks the participant to assess their worst stiffness in the last 24 hours. Participants rate their worst stiffness on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "no stiffness" and 10 is "worst imaginable." Lower scores represented better level of stiffness.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 25
score on a scalePart 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo
Change From Baseline in the Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 25-3.00 (-3.46 to -2.55)-0.57 (-1.21 to 0.07)
Statistical analysis
  • Part 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021) vs Part 1- Placebo · Mixed model repeated measures · p = <0.0001 · Least square mean difference: -2.44 · 95% CI -3.22 to -1.65
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS Score at Week 25

Participants reported responses to the BPI Worst Pain NRS. The BPI Worst Pain NRS ranged from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine."

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS Score at Week 25
Score on a scalePart 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS Score at Week 25-2.32 (-2.73 to -1.91)-0.23 (-0.80 to 0.34)
Statistical analysis
  • Part 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021) vs Part 1- Placebo · Mixed model repeated measures · p = <0.0001 · Least square mean difference: -2.09 · 95% CI -2.79 to -1.39
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 25

All participants were asked 11 or 13 questions from the PROMIS-PF item bank. The questions used one of two 5-point verbal rating scales: either 1 = "unable to do", 2 = "with much difficulty", 3 = "with some difficulty", 4 = "with a little difficulty", and 5 = "without any difficulty"; or 1 = "cannot do", 2 = "quite a lot", 3 = "somewhat", 4 = "very little", and 5 = "not at all." The T-score rescales the total raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore, a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. The T-score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better physical function status.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · T-score
Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 25
T-scorePart 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo
Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 255.63 (4.21 to 7.06)2.23 (0.23 to 4.24)
Statistical analysis
  • Part 1- Pimicotinib(ABSK021) vs Part 1- Placebo · Mixed model repeated measures · p = 0.0074 · Least square mean difference: 3.40 · 95% CI 0.94 to 5.86

Adverse events

Collected over Collection of adverse events started from the signing of informed consent through safety follow-up (up to 5.9 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Part 1 Pimicotinib(ABSK021)0/63 (0%)3/63 (4.8%)62/63 (98.4%)
Part 1- Placebo0/31 (0%)1/31 (3.2%)27/31 (87.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPart 1 Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/631/31
Enterocolitis infectiousInfections and infestations1/630/31
Blood pressure increasedInvestigations1/630/31
Erythema nodosumSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/630/31
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 55
Most frequent other events
EventPart 1 Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo
Blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations45/635/31
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increasedInvestigations36/630/31
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations34/633/31
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders33/631/31
Face oedemaGeneral disorders30/630/31
Amylase increasedInvestigations22/630/31
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders22/630/31
Periorbital oedemaEye disorders20/633/31
FatigueGeneral disorders18/637/31
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders17/632/31

Baseline characteristics

This is the baseline analysis population for Part 1 (Weeks 1 - 24)

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Part 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo, Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Total
Mean42.6 ± 14.3038.3 ± 12.4641.2 ± 13.79
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Part 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo, Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Total
Female451964
Male181230
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Part 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo, Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian321648
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American325
White261137
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported123
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Part 1/Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Part 1- Placebo, Part 2/Part 3- Pimicotinib(ABSK021)Total
Canada6410
Netherlands5510
United States8311
China311445
Poland202
Italy426
Spain7310
08

Study locations

40 sites
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Xu H, Niu X, Ravi V, Martin-Broto J, Razak AA, Saleh R, Zhou Y, Shen J, Liu T, Sankhala KK, Serrano C, Stacchiotti S, Wang J, Baldi GG, Feng Y, Hua Y, Li T, Rutkowski P, Zhang X, Tinoco G, Zou Q, Shan B, Zhu X, Gelderblom H. Pimicotinib versus placebo for tenosynovial giant cell tumour (MANEUVER): an international, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2026 Mar 14;407(10533):1072-1083. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)02602-9. Epub 2026 Mar 5. PubMed 41796601 ↗
  • Niu X, Ravi V, Shan B, Guo Q, Shi H, Zou Q, Gelderblom H. MANEUVER: A Phase III study of pimicotinib to assess efficacy and safety in tenosynovial giant cell tumor patients. Future Oncol. 2026 Feb;22(5):507-514. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2396227. Epub 2024 Sep 17. PubMed 39287124 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2023 to primary completion in Sep 2024, 16 months.

Results were first posted in May 2026, 1 year 7 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 13, 2023
First posted
Apr 7, 2023
StartActual
Apr 27, 2023
Primary completionActual
Sep 23, 2024
CompletionEst.
Jun 2028
Results first posted
May 4, 2026
Last update
May 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05804045
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 7, 2023
Start date
Apr 27, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 23, 2024
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Results posted
May 4, 2026
Last update
May 4, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Pimicotinib

Start the discussion