ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05800743ARISEIIUpdated May 29, 2026

Evaluation of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft

An interventional study of GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device) and GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device) in Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Pseudoaneurysm and Aortic Dissection, sponsored by W.L.Gore & Associates. Enrolling by invitation at 41 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-29.

Sponsored by W.L.Gore & Associates · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
370
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of ARISE II is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft device in the treatment of lesions involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
  • Pseudoaneurysm
  • Aortic Dissection
  • Aorta; Lesion

Keywords

  • Ascending Aorta
  • Pseudoaneurysm
  • Aortic Lesion
  • Endovascular Repair
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
03

In context

Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic

131 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 370 is above the median of 50 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic.

Browse Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic studies →

Lead sponsor

W.L.Gore & Associates is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: ASG Device Alone Arm

The patient is/has:

  1. Ascending Aortic pathologies warranting surgical repair compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device meeting any of the following criteria: Aneurysm

    1. Fusiform aneurysm (≥50mm or documented growth rate >0.5cm/year)
    2. Saccular aneurysm (no diameter criteria)
    3. Pseudoaneurysms (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria) Non-aneurysm
    4. Penetrating Aortic Ulcers (PAUs) (no diameter criteria)
    5. Pseudoaneurysms, following open surgical repair of a Type A dissection (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria)
  2. Anatomic compatibility with ASG device based on Gore Imaging Sciences review.

    1. Treatment must be limited to the ascending aorta
    2. Lesion location is ≥2cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostia
    3. Distal extent of the lesion is located ≥2cm proximal to the origin of the Brachiocephalic Artery (BCA)
    4. Proximal and distal landing zones must be ≥2cm in length
    5. Landing zones cannot be heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed
    6. Landing zone diameter between 27mm - 48mm
    7. For patients with prior replacement of the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch by an endovascular or surgical graft, there must be at least ≥2 cm overlap of ASG device and previously implanted graft.
  3. Considered high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting any of the following criteria:

    1. ≥75 years of age
    2. Previous median sternotomy
    3. Documented identification of other subject-specific risk factors (e.g., medical history, active medical diagnosis) by a study investigator and an experienced open ascending and/or aortic arch surgeon (e.g., cardiothoracic surgeon).
  4. Age ≥18 years at time of signature
  5. Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach
  6. Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative
  7. Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up

Exclusion Criteria: ASG Device Alone Arm

The patient is/has:

  1. De novo Type A dissection
  2. Requires immediate treatment
  3. Dissected great vessels requiring treatment
  4. Anticipated need for coronary or aortic valve intervention within one year post treatment
  5. Any aortic valve repair or replacement including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or coronary artery intervention within 30 days prior to treatment
  6. Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or treatment for acute coronary syndrome requiring Dual Anti Therapy (DAPT) within 30 days prior to treatment
  7. Open chest surgical repair within 30 days prior to treatment
  8. Presence of Intramural Hematoma (IMH) in landing zones
  9. Prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position that precludes safe delivery of the ASG device
  10. Aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater
  11. Previous endovascular repair with a non-Gore device that would interfere with or result in contact with planned repair
  12. Concomitant vascular disease requiring treatment that is not planned for index endovascular procedure
  13. Any stroke or myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to treatment
  14. Presence of protruding and/or irregular thrombus and/or atheroma in the ascending aorta or aortic arch or any other factors that could increase the risk of stroke based on imaging review
  15. Known degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome, EDS)
  16. Participation in drug or medical device study within one year of enrollment unless approved by the sponsor
  17. Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment
  18. Pregnant at time of procedure
  19. Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm
  20. Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication)
  21. Renal failure, defined as patients with an estimated (eGFR) \<30 (mL/min/1.73 m2) or currently requiring dialysis
  22. \<12 months
  23. Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials
  24. Known or to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment
  25. Body habitus or other medical condition which prevents adequate fluoroscopic and CT visualization of the aorta

Inclusion Criteria: ASG + TBE Device Arm

The patient is/has:

  1. Ascending and/or Arch Aortic pathologies warranting surgical repair compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device and meeting any of the following criteria: Aneurysms

    1. Fusiform aneurysm (≥55 mm or documented growth rate >0.5cm/year)
    2. Saccular aneurysm (no diameter criteria)
    3. Pseudoaneurysms (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria) Non-aneurysms
    4. Penetrating Aortic Ulcers (no diameter criteria)
    5. Pseudoaneurysms, following open surgical repair of a Type A dissection (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria)
    6. Chronic de novo (>90 days) Type A aortic dissection requiring treatment

      • Chronic de novo aortic dissection with primary entry tear in the ascending aorta or arch
      • Chronic de novo aortic dissection with primary entry tear in the descending thoracic aorta with retrograde involvement of the aortic arch and/or ascending aorta
    7. Residual aortic dissection following surgical repair of Type A aortic dissection requiring treatment (>30 days post-surgery)
  2. Anatomic compatibility with ASG device used in combination with the TBE Device based on Gore Imaging Sciences review.

    Proximal Aortic Landing Zone:

    1. Landing zone is native aorta or surgical graft
    2. Lesion location is ≥2cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostia
    3. Proximal landing zone must be ≥2cm in the ascending aorta.
    4. Landing zone cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed
    5. Landing zone diameter between 27mm - 48mm
    6. Acceptable proximal landing zone outer curvature length for the required device

    Branch Vessel Landing Zone:

    1. Length of ≥2.5 cm proximal to first major branch vessel
    2. Target branch vessel inner diameters of 11-18 mm
    3. Target branch vessel landing zone must be in native vessel that cannot be heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed

    Distal Aortic Landing Zone:

    1. Outer curvature must be ≥2 cm proximal to the celiac artery
    2. Aortic inner diameters between 16-42 mm
    3. Landing zone in native aorta or previously implanted GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft (CTAG Device)
  3. Considered high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting any of the following criteria:

    1. ≥75 years of age
    2. Previous median sternotomy
    3. Documented identification of other subject-specific risk factors (e.g., medical history, active medical diagnosis) by a study investigator and an experienced open ascending and/or aortic arch surgeon (e.g., cardiothoracic surgeon).
  4. Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature
  5. Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach
  6. Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative
  7. Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up

Exclusion Criteria: ASG + TBE Device Arm

The patient is/has:

  1. Acute and subacute de novo Type A dissection (defined as \<90 days)
  2. Requires immediate treatment
  3. Dissected great vessels requiring treatment
  4. Anticipated need for coronary or aortic valve intervention within one year post treatment
  5. Any aortic valve repair or replacement including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or coronary artery intervention within 30 days prior to treatment
  6. Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or treatment for acute coronary syndrome requiring Dual Anti Platelet Therapy (DAPT) within 30 days prior to treatment.
  7. Open chest surgical repair within 30 days prior to treatment
  8. Presence of Intramural Hematoma (IMH) in landing zones
  9. Prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position that precludes safe delivery of the ASG device
  10. Aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater.
  11. Previous endovascular repair with a non-Gore device that would interfere with or result in contact with planned repair
  12. Concomitant vascular disease requiring treatment that is not planned for index endovascular procedure
  13. Any stroke or myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to treatment
  14. Presence of protruding and/or irregular thrombus and/or atheroma in the ascending aorta or aortic arch or any other factors that could increase the risk of stroke based on imaging review
  15. Known degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan Syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, EDS)
  16. Participation in investigational drug or medical device study within one year of enrollment unless approved by the sponsor
  17. Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment
  18. Pregnant at time of procedure
  19. Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm
  20. Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication)
  21. Renal failure, defined as patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) \<30 (mL/min/1.73 m2) or currently requiring dialysis
  22. Life expectancy \<12 months
  23. Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials
  24. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment
  25. Body habitus or other medical condition which prevents adequate fluoroscopic and CT visualization of the aorta
  26. Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2) or known hypersensitivity to heparin or a history of a hypercoagulability disorder and/or state

Inclusion Criteria: Surgical Follow-up Cohort

Subjects who meet the following criteria will be followed:

  1. The aortic lesion involves the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch
  2. The subject is determined to be high-risk for open surgical repair per the protocol requirements
  3. The subject is at least 18 years of age
  4. The subject is willing to comply with the protocol requirements
  5. Open surgery to repair the aortic lesion the patient was screened for is intended to be performed at the investigational site responsible for initiating the screening process for the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
370 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ASG device only in Ascending Aorta

    Ascending Aortic Isolated Lesions, Pseudoaneurysms and Penetrating Aortic Ulcers in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair, treated with endovascular repair using the ASG device alone.

    Device: GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)

  • Experimental
    ASG + TBE

    Ascending Aorta/Aortic Arch Isolated Lesions and Chronic De Novo Dissections in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair, treated with endovascular repair using the ASG and TBE devices.

    Device: GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device)

  • Other
    Surgical Follow-up Cohort

    Open surgical repair of ascending aorta in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair

    Procedure: Surgery

Interventions

  • DeviceGORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)

    Endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta

  • DeviceGORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device)

    Endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta/aortic arch

    Also known as: Revascularization Procedure

  • ProcedureSurgery

    Open surgical repair of the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary effectiveness endpoint as measured by device technical success and absence of reintervention.

    The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of the following events through one month post procedure: Device Technical Success and Absence of Reintervention. Technical Success is defined as including: 1. Successful access and delivery to the intended implantation site, and retrieval of the device delivery system, and; 2. Accurate placement of the device at the intended implantation site, and 3. Patency of the graft in absence of clinically significant device deformations (e.g., kinking, stent eversion, mal-deployment, misaligned deployment), and Absence of reintervention is defined as: The absence of unanticipated additional procedures related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system

    Time frame: 30 Days

  2. Primary Safety Endpoint as measured by a composite of the absence of aortic rupture, lesion-related mortality, disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, and new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis.

    The primary safety endpoint is a composite of the following events through 30 days post endovascular procedure: * Aortic rupture * Lesion-related mortality * Disabling Stroke * Permanent paraplegia * Permanent paraparesis * New onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis

    Time frame: 30 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary endpoints as measured as a composite of procedural and treatment success.

    Two secondary endpoints are planned for the study with no inferential analysis. Composite endpoint of procedural success elements measured at one month follow-up Composite endpoint of treatment success elements measured at all appropriate follow-up windows

    Time frame: 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

  2. Secondary endpoint as measured by Short Form-36® physical component summary (PCS)

    Short Form-36® PCS measured at the one year follow-up visit with inferential analysis

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

41 sites
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05800743
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 6, 2023
Start date
Nov 28, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2034 (estimated)
Last update
May 29, 2026

Study contacts

Eric Roselli, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion