CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05799664Updated Sep 30, 2026

Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of TLD Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of COPD

An interventional study of TLD and Sham TLD procedure in COPD, sponsored by Hangzhou Broncus Medical Co., Ltd.. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.

Sponsored by Hangzhou Broncus Medical Co., Ltd. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
189
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Targeted Lung Denervation (TLD) for COPD patients using the lung denervation radiofrequency ablation device.

02

Conditions studied

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants aged ≥40 and ≤ 85 years;
  2. Diagnosis of COPD with post-bronchodilator PFT parameters FEV1/FVC\<70% and 20% ≤ FEV1 ≤ 60% of predicted; if FEV1\<30%pred, PaCO2≤50mmHg;
  3. CAT ≥ 10 or mMRC ≥2;
  4. Non-smoking for a minimum of 2 months prior to consent and agrees to not smoke for the duration of the clinical investigation;
  5. Recent participation in a formal pulmonary rehabilitation program should have occurred ≥3 months prior to consent; if participants are currently enrolled in a maintenance program, they should agree to continue their current program through their 12-month follow-up visit;
  6. Documented history of taking standard medication (consistent with GOLD guideline\<2022>) for ≥12 months at the time of consent;
  7. Received an influenza vaccine within the 12 months prior to consent or agrees to obtain an influenza vaccine during the clinical investigation, and agrees to annual influenza vaccines for the duration of the clinical investigation;
  8. Resting SpO2 ≥ 89% at the time of screening;
  9. Willing, able, and agrees to complete all protocol required baseline and follow-up testing assessments including finishing the Patient Diary;
  10. Able to understand the purpose of the clinical investigation, agree to participate in the trial and able to complete the informed consent signature.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. BMI \< 18 or > 35;
  2. Asthma as defined by the GINA guideline (2022);
  3. Patient has been previously diagnosed with a non-COPD active lung disease (e.g., active tuberculosis);
  4. Patient has a medical history of pneumothorax within 6 months before the screening visit;
  5. Known contraindication or allergy to medications required for bronchoscopy or general anesthesia that cannot be medically controlled;
  6. Recent respiratory infections or COPD exacerbation in preceding 4 weeks;
  7. Malignancy treated with radiation or chemotherapy within 2 years of consent;
  8. Daily use of > 10 mg of prednisone or its equivalent at the time of consent;
  9. Recent (within 3 months of consent) opioid use;
  10. Known gastrointestinal motility disorder or previous abdominal surgical procedure on stomach, esophagus, or pancreas
  11. Has an implantable electronic device;
  12. Previous or planned pulmonary or thoracic surgery (including pneumonectomy, lung transplantation, bronchoscopic/interventional lung volume reduction procedures \< e.g. endobronchial valve implantation or bronchial thermal vapor ablation, etc.>) during this trial;
  13. Myocardial infarction within last 6 months, EKG with evidence of life-threatening arrhythmias or acute ischemia, pre-existing documented evidence of a LVEF \< 45%, stage C or D (ACC/AHA) or Class III or IV (NYHA) congestive heart failure, or any other cardiac findings that make the participant an unacceptable candidate for a bronchoscopic procedure utilizing general anesthesia;
  14. High risk of pulmonary hypertension according to clinical assessment, defined as pulmonary artery systolic pressure estimated by echocardiogram to be > 50 mmHg;
  15. A lesion highly suspicious for malignancy in the lung or elsewhere, as determined by a specialist, that is expected to require surgery or systemic anticancer therapy within 1 year.;
  16. Clinically relevant bronchiectasis, defined as severe single lobe or multilobar bronchial wall thickening associated with airway dilation on CT scan leading to cough, intractable expectoration and repeated hemoptysis lasting for several days;
  17. In the opinion of the Investigator, use of the TLD devices is not feasible, for example, due to screening chest CT scan reveals severe emphysema or bronchi anatomy cannot be fully treated with available catheter sizes: severe bullous disease (> 1/3 hemithorax) or site discovery of a mass that requires treatment;
  18. A GCSI total symptom score ≥ 18.0 prior to treatment;
  19. Any disease or condition that might interfere with completion of a procedure or this study (e.g., life expectancy\< 1 years);
  20. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (blood or urine) pre-treatment and agree not to become pregnant for the duration of the study
  21. Participated in any clinical trial and received experimental treatment within 3 months before the screening visit.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
189 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    Patients will be treated with TLD and standard of care (per GOLD guideline).

    Device: TLD · Other: Standard of care

  • Sham comparator
    Control group

    Patients will undergo sham TLD procedure and be treated with standard of care (per GOLD guideline).

    Other: Sham TLD procedure · Other: Standard of care

Interventions

  • DeviceTLD

    Patients allocated to experimental group will receive TLD therapy during which radiofrequency energy will be delivered to vagus nerve surrounding airway under bronchoscopy.

  • OtherSham TLD procedure

    Patients allocated to control group will receive sham TLD procedure during which catheter will be placed in all treatment locations with no radiofrequency energy delivered.

  • OtherStandard of care

    Patients will also receive standard of care that meet the recommendations of GOLD guideline.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of Forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1) relative to baseline

    Defined as change in FEV1 at 6 months relative to baseline in the experimental group, compared to the control group.

    Time frame: 6 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first moderate or severe COPD exacerbation, first severe COPD exacerbation and first respiratory-related hospitalization.

    Defined as a comparison between study arms of the survival distributions for events based on log-rank tests.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  2. Change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire COPD Version (SGRQ-C) Total score

    Defined as a comparison between study arms of the mean change in SGRQ-C from baseline. The SGRQ-C is a questionnaire developed to measure health status (quality of life) in COPD patients with a total and three component scores for: symptoms, activity and impacts; each score ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 100 (worst possible).

    Time frame: 6 and 12 Months

  3. Change in modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale Total score

    Defined as a comparison between study arms of the mean change in mMRC from baseline. The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale is recommended for conducting assessments of dyspnea and disability and functions. Total score ranging 0 to 4. The higher the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 Months

  4. Change in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Total score

    Defined as a comparison between study arms of the mean change in CAT from baseline. The CAT is a disease-specific HRQL with eight questions; each score ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (worst possible). The CAT has a scoring range of 0-40. Higher scores denote a more severe impact of COPD on a patient's life.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 Months

  5. Change in Pulmonary Function

    Defined as a comparison between study arms of the mean change in FEV1%pred, FVC(%pred), RV(%pred) from baseline.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 Months

  6. Change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)

    Defined as a comparison between study arms of the mean change in 6MWD from baseline.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 Months

  7. Device Success Rate of experimental group

    Defined as the proportion of the number of ablation procedures in which the catheter would be successfully placed on the treatment site and the catheter would be successfully withdrawn after the completion of the treatment procedure in all the ablation procedures.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

  8. (Serious) Adverse Event Rate related to device or procedure

    Defined as the total number of events per total number of treatment years.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • West China Hospital of Sichuan University
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China
    • Fengming Luo, M.D · Contact · luofengming@hotmail.com · +8618980601355
    • Fengming Luo, M.D. · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05799664
Lead sponsor
Hangzhou Broncus Medical Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 5, 2023
Start date
Jul 4, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2026

Study contacts

Liheng Xie
Contact
medicalaffairs@broncuschina.com
+8613916444591
Fengming Luo, M.D.
principal investigator · West China Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion