CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05796700Updated Apr 3, 2023

Microwave Ablation Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for 3-5cm Hepatocellular Carcinoma

An interventional study of Microwave Ablation in Overall Survival, Progression-free Survival and Cost, sponsored by Chinese PLA General Hospital. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-03.

Sponsored by Chinese PLA General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 15 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2008, registered Mar 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,585
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As the most common subtype of liver cancer (85% \~ 90%), HCC is highly malignant; thus, one of the crucial issues in HCC management is an effective therapy for tumors at an early stage, which is vital for improving the prognosis of patients. For ≤3cm HCC, ablation has been recommended by international guidelines as a first-line or alternative treatment because of similar survival outcomes and milder liver function injury with liver resection (LR). However, the appropriate treatment options for 3-5cm HCC remain controversial. Thus, none of the international guidelines recommend ablation as a first-line treatment for 3-5cm HCC. In the past few decades, treatment for HCC has tended to be less invasive, have fewer complications, and have higher cost-effectiveness. Compared with LR, laparoscopic Hepatectomy (LH) demonstrates the advancement of minimal invasion. As another minimally invasive technique for HCC, Microwave Ablation (MWA) has the potential to eradicate larger HCCs with larger coagulation areas and is less affected by the heat sink effect caused by vessels around the tumor. Many studies have identified the potential advantages of MWA over other ablation techniques. However, to date, no clinical studies have compared the efficacy of LH and MWA therapies for 3-5cm HCC with periodic progression.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overall Survival
  • Progression-free Survival
  • Cost
03

In context

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

3,182 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; 954 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,585 is above the median of 55 across 2,298 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.

Browse Carcinoma, Hepatocellular studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese PLA General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 558 studies on the registry; 202 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

i) age ≥18 years ii) all patients with an initial diagnosis of 3-5cm HCC(within 3 tumors, at least one 3-5cm) by histopathology iii) Child-Pugh class A or B iv) no vascular invasion or distant metastasis v) no other malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

i) age \<18 years ii) Child-Pugh class ≥B iii) vascular invasion or distant metastasis iv) with other malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,585 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Microwave Ablation

    According to the shape, size and location of each patient's tumor, as well as the adjacent relationship with the surrounding organs, the individual MWA scheme was pre-established. Contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) was used to evaluate complete ablation within 3 to 5 days after ablation. If radiography suggested incomplete ablation, supplementary ablation was performed as soon as the patient's condition permitted. A cooled-shaft MW system (KY-2000, Kangyou Medical, China) was used in the procedure.

    Procedure: Microwave Ablation

  • Active comparator
    Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

    The optimal surgical procedure for each patient depends on the characteristics of the tumor. Patients were placed in French position and a laparoscopic-assisted partial hepatectomy was performed under CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure 12-14 mmHg (1 mmHg =0.133 kPa). In most cases, a 4-well or 5-well method was used under general anesthesia.

    Procedure: Microwave Ablation

Interventions

  • ProcedureMicrowave Ablation

    Microwave Ablation: A minimally invasive technique for HCC, MWA has the potential to eradicate larger HCCs with larger coagulation areas and is less affected by the heat sink effect caused by vessels around the tumor. Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: The technique has been widely promoted worldwide with technical progress. In patients with cirrhosis, LLR has the potential advantage of reducing the risk of postoperative liver decompensation

    Also known as: Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    OS was defined as death related to any cause and was indexed from the date of ablation or surgery until last contact or death

    Time frame: More than 3 years

  2. Progession-free survival

    DFS was defined as the time interval between first treatment and recurrence or death, whichever occurred earlier.

    Time frame: More than 3 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data can be shared with the consent of the corresponding author.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05796700
Lead sponsor
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Responsible party
Ping Liang (Chief physician, Professor, Chinese PLA General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 3, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2008
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2019
Completion
Dec 30, 2020
Last update
Apr 3, 2023

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion