An interventional study of Non-Relational Chatbot Physical Activity Intervention and Relational Chatbot Physical Activity Intervention in Behavior, Health, sponsored by University of California, Davis. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-13.
Sponsored by University of California, Davis · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
This study aims to empirically test the theoretical mechanisms of relational perceptions in the context of building and testing a relational artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot for improving physical activity (PA) behaviors among a sedentary adult population in the U.S.
The aim of the study is to build and experimentally test relational capacities of AI chatbot in inducing positive human-AI relationship and leading to higher PA behavior change intention. During the 7-day intervention, the relational chatbot will educate participants on physical activity using 5 types of relational messages during a PA intervention including 1) social dialogue, 2) empathy, 3) self-disclosure, 4) meta-relational communication, and 5) humor. On the other hand, the non-relational chatbot will only deliver PA intervention messages, without relational cues. Relational chatbot condition will be compared to the non-relational chatbot condition to assess its effectiveness.
The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of the mobile app intervention leveraging chatbots in increasing participants' relationship perception and physical activity behavior change.
Despite the recognition of the importance of communication for relationship and trust building in healthcare programs (Ward, 2018), theoretical work and empirical testing of relational capacities in AI chatbot designed for changing health behaviors is lacking in previous research. In our systematic review of AI chatbot-based interventions on PA, diet, and weight loss outcomes, it was found that although majority of studies programmed AI chatbots to engage in relational communication behaviors (e.g., personalized greetings, showing empathy and compassion), none of these studies tested whether AI chatbot's relational capacities contributed to human-AI trust and relationship building (Oh et al., 2021). Beyond knowing some chatbots were perceived to be useful and friendly, we do not know theoretical mechanisms for what relational conversational strategies contribute to higher quality relationship perception and behavior outcomes.
By developing an AI chatbot that provides access to informational, motivational, and socio-emotional aspects of care will open new opportunities for delivering accessible interventions to improve sedentary population's PA behaviors. More broadly, the test of the AI Chatbot Behavior Change Model (Zhang et al., 2020) will provide the first empirical evidence on the model's utility and working mechanisms accounting for how relational AI chatbot can change health behaviors. If successful, the theoretical model and design of the relational chatbot will be able to generalize to related behavior change fields.
This field experiment will randomly assign participants to relational chatbot condition or non-relational (control) chatbot condition. Both conditions will involve an information component addressing physical activity education sessions.
The objective of this study is to test the efficacy of the mobile app intervention leveraging chatbots in increasing participants' relationship perception and physical activity behavior change.
University of California, Davis is the lead sponsor of 798 studies on the registry; 146 are open to participants now.
Of its 65 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (66%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants are randomly assigned to a non-relational chatbot in a mobile app. The chatbot will provide physical activity education sessions. The chatbot will not engage in relational conversation behaviors.
Behavioral: Non-Relational Chatbot Physical Activity Intervention
Participants are randomly assigned to a relational chatbot in a mobile app. The chatbot will provide physical activity education sessions. The chatbot will engage in relational conversation behaviors.
Behavioral: Relational Chatbot Physical Activity Intervention
Mobile app-based intervention. Participants will engage in a daily chat with a physical activity promotion chatbot. The chatbot does not, or only minimally, provide relational behavioral cues. Participants will view their progress of daily step counts.
Mobile app-based intervention. Participants will engage in a daily chat with a physical activity promotion chatbot. The chatbot provides relational behavioral cues. Participants will view their progress of daily step counts.
Relationship perception
12-item measure based on Therapeutic Alliance Scale as an indication of relationship between participants and the chatbot. Ranges from 1 = "strongly disagree" to 5 = "strongly agree."
Time frame: 1 week
Changes in physical activity behavior
6-item measure based on 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Record the types of physical activities, days, and minutes.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Physical activity behavior (step counts)
Step counts across 7 days (1 week) of intervention.
Time frame: Daily, 1 week
Chatbot usability
13-item measure of usability of the chatbot based on chatbot usability questionnaire (CUQ). Ranges from 1 = "strongly disagree" to 5 = "strongly agree."
Time frame: 1 week
Chatbot perception
17-item measure of the perceived warmth and competence of the chatbot. Ranges from 1 = "strongly disagree" to 5 = "strongly agree."
Time frame: 1 week
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of California, Davis