CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05793138Updated Sep 8, 2026

Dialysis Geriatric Care Model

An interventional study of Geriatric Care Model and Usual Care in Chronic Kidney Diseases, Dialysis and Geriatric, sponsored by Duke University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 55 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
55 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objectives of this study are to refine the dialysis care model with key stakeholder input and conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to obtain evidence critical to inform a definitive RCT.

Read the detailed description

The investigators designed a new dialysis care model that includes a centralized geriatric team that uses information from the Geriatric screen for OLder Dialysis patients (GOLD) to develop individualized recommendations for geriatric syndrome management based on the patient's priorities. The study population is older adults receiving hemodialysis and dialysis staff. The investigators will have patient participants complete the care model and undergo geriatric evaluation. This phase will be referred to as refinement aim 1. The investigators will then assess agreement of each GOLD instrument with its corresponding geriatric evaluation. The investigators will assess acceptability and feasibility of the care model through surveys and interviews with patients and dialysis staff to complete refinement aim 2. Once the new dialysis care model is redefined, the investigators will conduct the third phase, pilot RCT (geriatric care model vs. usual care) and assess geriatric problem management at 4 months, as well as, patient reported outcomes, physical function, and health care utilization at intervals up to 12 months. The analyses will include 1) measure of agreement using Cohen's kappa, 2) qualitative rapid analyses, 3) descriptive statistics from acceptability and feasibility surveys, 4) descriptive statistics from pilot RCT data, and 5) tests for difference in geriatric problem management between treatment and control groups. The study does not involve activity from participants that would exceed normal or routine care so there are negligible physical, financial, or legal risks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Kidney Diseases
  • Dialysis
  • Geriatric

Keywords

  • Dialysis
  • Quality of life
  • Care Model
03

In context

Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

3,144 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; 704 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 74 across 2,176 interventional studies indexed under Renal Insufficiency, Chronic.

Browse Renal Insufficiency, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • community-dwelling dialysis patients 55 and older
  • may have cognitive impairment

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • advanced dementia
  • non-English or Spanish speaking
  • nursing home residents
  • hospice enrollees
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Usual Care

    Participants will receive usual dialysis care for 12 months, then they will receive the geriatric care model.

    Behavioral: Usual Care

  • Active comparator
    Geriatric Care Model

    Participants will complete the GOLD, along with a few additional short surveys and a Short Physical Performance Battery. Information gathered will guide the research geriatric team's recommendation report to the participants' dialysis care team. The dialysis teams will receive training on how to use the recommendation report and local resources to initiate geriatric problem management. Participants will be seen every 4 months for follow-up for roughly 12 months.

    Behavioral: Geriatric Care Model

Interventions

  • BehavioralGeriatric Care Model

    First, older adults complete the Geriatric screen for OLder adults receiving Dialysis (GOLD), a battery of validated, self-administered geriatric screening instruments, used to identify Geriatric 5M-related problems. Then, a research team with geriatrics expertise leads patient prioritization of GOLD-identified problems in a telehealth visit and provides the dialysis team with guideline-directed, individualized recommendations for geriatric problem management.

  • BehavioralUsual Care

    Participants will continue to receive standard of care. Then after 12 months, they will follow the Geriatric Care Model. They will complete the Geriatric screen for OLder adults receiving Dialysis (GOLD), a battery of validated, self-administered geriatric screening instruments, used to identify Geriatric 5M-related problems. Then, a research team with geriatrics expertise leads patient prioritization of GOLD-identified problems in a telehealth visit and provides the dialysis team with guideline-directed, individualized recommendations for geriatric problem management.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in geriatric problem management as measured by survey

    Problems include depression, anxiety, difficulty with memory, difficulty with daily activities, falling or fear of falling, obtaining and following instructions for taking medications, having unwelcome side effects from medications, not having enough support from others, and not having access to or eating enough food. The score for each problem ranges from 0 to 4, where a higher score indicates better management of the problem.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Practicality as measured by amount of time utilized by study personnel to conduct RCT (randomized controlled trial)

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  2. Practicality as measured by number of participants who needed study personnel assistance to complete the GOLD electronically

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  3. Fidelity as measured by the Care model recommendation checklist

    Care model recommendation checklist includes a recommendation informed by the GOLD, recommendation align with patient priority, recommendation received by clinician, and recommendation decision

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months

  4. Retention as measured by number of participants who complete the study

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  5. Recruitment as measured by number of participants enrolled

    Time frame: up to 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05793138
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
University of California, San Francisco
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 31, 2023
Start date
Dec 10, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Rasheeda K Hall, MD, MBA, MHS, FASN
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion