CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05788393Updated May 14, 2026

Opioid Sparing Analgesia Continuous Intraoperative Infusion of Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex] and Lidocaine IV in Analgesia, sponsored by Assiut University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-14.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Opioid sparing analgesia: Continuous intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pain represents one of the most common complaints following surgeries. Despite advances in modern medicine, pain following surgical procedures is still a challenge for anesthetists, though significant progress made over the past decades. The mechanism of pain following laparoscopic procedures is thought to be multifactorial. The main causes of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are pain from the incision site, pneumoperitoneum and cholecystectomy. Clinicians using different methods for analgesia after LC. like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intraperitoneal local anesthetics, local anesthetics applied to the wound site, removal of the insufflation gas, paravertebral block (PVB), and epidural block. To date, the mainstay of management has been the administration of exogenous opioids such as morphine or fentanyl. However, pain is not always fully relieved by such agents, and often patients develop tolerance to them. The ever-increasing doses of opioids are clearly not without their adverse effects. In addition to that, many patients and even some clinicians wrongly believe that addiction can be inevitable after administration of opioids. Dexmedetomidine is an alpha 2-adrenergic agonist which is a relatively new drug used for procedural sedation. It has sedative and anxiolytic effects and is known for its analgesic potential owing to a reduction of sympathetic tone. Dexmedetomidine has dose-dependent effects, ranging from minimal to deep sedation. Moreover, except at doses that cause very deep sedation or general anesthesia, the sedation is reversible. These are unique properties among the sedative medications in common use. Dexmedetomidine does not impair the respiratory drive per se and seldom causes apnea. However, it has been shown to impair the respiratory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia and can cause hemodynamic effects such as hypertension, hypotension and bradycardia. Systemic lidocaine has centrally and peripherally analgesic, anti-hyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effects with reduced side-effects especially if used with appropriate dose. Recently, intravenous lidocaine infusion is considered a part of analgesic therapy regimen that decreases postoperative opioid requirements and enhances convalescence after major surgeries. Dexmedetomidine and lidocaine are common adjuvant medicine anesthetics during operation for the sedative and analgesic properties. Besides, some studies have proved that both are effective in relieving postoperative pain in adults. However, there are very limited studies comparing the effects of the two adjuvant analgesics on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

02

Conditions studied

  • Analgesia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Agnosia

1,190 studies on the registry are indexed under Agnosia; 508 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 78 across 1,024 interventional studies indexed under Agnosia.

Browse Agnosia studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient's status ASA status-I and II.
  • Patients age above 18 years old.
  • Patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patients with known allergy to dexmedetomidine or lidocaine.
  • Patients with significant hepatic dysfunction.
  • Patients with severe renal disease.
  • Patients with chronic pain.
  • Regular use analgesics, antidepressants or opioids in last month.
  • Any known convulsive disorder.
  • Significant heart disease.
  • Morbid obesity (BMI>35).
  • Patients with autoimmune disease
  • Patients on corticosteroid therapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Breast feeding
  • Woman under hormonal treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dexmedetomidine group

    This group will receive continuous intraoperative dexmedetomidine IV infusion \[1ug/kg dexmedetomidine over 15 min as a loading dose and 0.5ug/kg/h for maintenance\].

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex]

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine group

    This group will receive continuous intraoperative lidocaine IV infusion \[1.5 mg/kg lidocaine over 15 min as a loading dose and 1.5 mg/kg/h for maintenance\].

    Drug: Lidocaine IV

Interventions

  • DrugDexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex]

    dexmedetomidine group will receive continuous intraoperative dexmedetomidine IV infusion \[1ug/kg dexmedetomidine over 15 min as a loading dose and 0.5ug/kg/h for maintenance\].The continuous intraoperative IV infusion of study drug will be stopped 10 min before the end the surgical procedure.

  • DrugLidocaine IV

    lidocaine group will receive continuous intraoperative lidocaine IV infusion \[1.5 mg/kg lidocaine over 15 min as a loading dose and 1.5 mg/kg/h for maintenance\]. The continuous intraoperative IV infusion of study drug will be stopped 10 min before the end the surgical procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) will be explained to the patient to be able to choose the score that best expressed the intensity of pain postoperatively ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable".

    Time frame: 6 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale

    Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) will be used to evaluate the level of sedation in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), It is a 10-point scale, with four levels of anxiety or agitation, one level denoting a calm and alert state, and 5 levels of sedation, ranging from +4 to -5, desirable score is 0 to -2.

    Time frame: 15 minutes

  2. First call for rescue analgesic (Nalbuphine)

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. The total postoperative Nalbuphine consumption

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Intraoperative automated non-invasive blood pressure monitoring.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  5. Intraoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate monitoring.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  6. The mean duration of PACU stay.

    Time frame: 3 hours

Other outcomes

  1. Side effects of study drugs.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  2. Satisfaction of the patients questionnaire

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Assiut university hospitals
    Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mitra S, Carlyle D, Kodumudi G, Kodumudi V, Vadivelu N. New Advances in Acute Postoperative Pain Management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Apr 4;22(5):35. doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0690-8. PubMed 29619627 ↗
  • Meera A. Pain and Opioid Dependence: Is it a Matter of Concern. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Jan;17(Suppl):S36-8. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.76240. PubMed 21811368 ↗
  • Barends CR, Absalom A, van Minnen B, Vissink A, Visser A. Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam in Procedural Sedation. A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169525. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28107373 ↗
  • Batko I, Koscielniak-Merak B, Tomasik PJ, Kobylarz K, Wordliczek J. Lidocaine as an element of multimodal analgesic therapy in major spine surgical procedures in children: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Pharmacol Rep. 2020 Jun;72(3):744-755. doi: 10.1007/s43440-020-00100-7. Epub 2020 Apr 15. PubMed 32297162 ↗
  • Bellon M, Le Bot A, Michelet D, Hilly J, Maesani M, Brasher C, Dahmani S. Efficacy of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Compared with Placebo for Postoperative Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies. Pain Ther. 2016 Jun;5(1):63-80. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0045-2. Epub 2016 Feb 10. PubMed 26861737 ↗
  • Weibel S, Jokinen J, Pace NL, Schnabel A, Hollmann MW, Hahnenkamp K, Eberhart LH, Poepping DM, Afshari A, Kranke P. Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):770-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew101. PubMed 27199310 ↗
  • Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9. PubMed 3785962 ↗
  • Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138. PubMed 12421743 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05788393
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Mina Daniel Hanna (Primary investigator, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 28, 2023
Start date
Apr 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2025
Completion
Feb 1, 2025
Last update
May 14, 2026

Study contacts

Mohamed S. Saad, Dr
principal investigator · Assiut university hospitals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion