ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05785247ENHANCEUpdated Sep 26, 2024

ENHANCE - Evaluating the Implementation of Head and Neck Cancer E-health

An observational study in Head and Neck Neoplasms, sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-26.

Sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2024), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
63
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The NHS Long Term Plan has an ambition to provide patients with digital services and tools to give them more control over their own health and care. Guy's Cancer Centre in London (UK) is offering patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) the use of a smartphone cancer support app. Few studies have evaluated the best way to implement apps to support patients with cancer, nor explored how they could help patients to self-manage. This is a hybrid implementation-effectiveness study to evaluate the implementation of a cancer-specific self-management app currently being used at Guy's Cancer Centre. The purpose of the study is to assess the following: (1) key implementation outcomes, including acceptability and usability; (2) barriers and facilitators to patients and staff using the app; (3) the effectiveness of the app to support patients to self-manage during treatment for HNC.

Eligible participants include patients being treated for HNC, and their oncology clinical team. The study will be conducted at Guy's Cancer Centre, a comprehensive cancer centre in London, UK.

The study will employ mixed methods. Data collection will involve questionnaires to measure the acceptability and usability of the app, and routinely collected patient-reported outcome measures. In addition, a sub-sample of participants will take part in semi-structured interviews to explore how the app was used and views about the implementation process. Findings from this study will identify barriers and facilitators to using the app and context about how it may help patients to self-manage their condition. These findings will help to refine ongoing development of digital cancer services. Findings will inform the development of recommendations for the integration of digital health in cancer services that can be shared with Cancer Alliances across the UK.

02

Conditions studied

  • Head and Neck Neoplasms

Keywords

  • implementation
  • digital health
  • ehealth
  • self-management
  • cancer support apps
03

In context

Head and Neck Neoplasms

2,403 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 559 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 63 is below the median of 100 across 453 observational studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.

Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 294 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Individuals currently undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer or (b) the healthcare staff involved in their care, who are currently using the app as part of local service improvement initiative

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals currently undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer, under the care of an oncologist, or
  • Health professionals involved in the care of patients using the app, or involved in the implementation of the app

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are not able to speak or understand English, due to no translation services available
  • Patients with ECOG Performance Status Scale level 3 or 4 at baseline
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adoption

    % of patients and staff to adopt the app

    Time frame: End of study, 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life

    Measured with EORTC QLQ C30 score

    Time frame: after 8 weeks of app use

  2. Health-related quality of life

    Measured with EORTC QLQ HN43 score

    Time frame: after 8 weeks of app use

  3. Health Service Resource Utilization

    Including unplanned hospital attendance (and length of inpatient stay), A\&E visits, urgent care use, unscheduled clinic visits, self-reported by patients at end of each treatment cycle or week and calculated as group proportions over the entire course of treatment.

    Time frame: After 8 weeks of app use or at EOT

  4. Patient and staff experience

    Qualitative interviews and focus groups will explore experience of app use in different groups (patients and staff)

    Time frame: after 8 weeks of app use

  5. Symptom Severity

    Symptom severity will be measured using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). CTCAE is a multidimensional clinician-reported assessment that evaluates physical and psychological symptoms according to their frequency, severity and distress/bother to the person in the past week.

    Time frame: Baseline (within 1 week before treatment starts). Mid-way throughout treatment (week 3-6 - dependent on treatment type) and EOT (around week 6-12)

  6. Clinician acceptability

    Using the Normalization Measurement Development questionnaire to assess clinicians' acceptance and perceptions of normalising behaviour into routine practice

    Time frame: End of study or 6 months since implementation of the app

  7. User/Satisfaction, System Usability

    post-implementation mHealth app usability questionnaire (patients and staff) designed to assess users' perceived satisfaction with mobile health applications. Questionnaire items are organized into scales, with each scale assumed to measure an attribute related to usability.

    Time frame: 8 weeks of app use

  8. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility

    Qualitative interviews with app users to explore experience of app usage as part of routine care

    Time frame: after 8 weeks of app use

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
    London, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — anonymised quantitative data will be deposited in the King's Open Research Data System (KORDS), at King's College London

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2025, 21 months after the start.

Of 193 non-industry observational studies under Head and Neck Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 81 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 158. This study's planned 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 211 studies reached it within 77 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 158.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 13, 2023
First posted
Mar 27, 2023
StartActual
Jun 14, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2025
Last update
Sep 26, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05785247
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 27, 2023
Start date
Jun 14, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 26, 2024

Study contacts

Mary Lei
principal investigator · Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion