CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05777070RICUpdated Jul 14, 2025

Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Bimanual Skill Learning and Corticospinal Excitability in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

An interventional study of Bimanual Cup Stacking Training in Unilateral Cerebral Palsy, sponsored by East Carolina University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-14.

Sponsored by East Carolina University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2022, registered Mar 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) is a leading cause of childhood disability. An early brain injury impairs the upper extremity function, bimanual coordination, and impacts the child's independence. The existing therapeutic interventions have higher training doses and modest effect sizes. Thus, there is a critical need to find an effective priming agent to enhance bimanual skill learning in children with UCP. This study aims to determine the effects of a novel priming agent, remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), when paired with bimanual skill training to enhance bimanual skill learning and to augment skill dependent plasticity in children with UCP.

Read the detailed description

Ischemic conditioning (IC) is a phenomenon of protecting the target organ from ischemia by directly exposing it to brief episodes of sublethal ischemia. RIC is a clinically feasible way of performing IC where episodes of ischemia and reperfusion are delivered with cyclic inflation and deflation of a blood pressure cuff on the arm or leg. Pre-clinical and preliminary clinical trials in humans show neuroprotective effects of RIC. Investigators prior work has shown that when paired with motor training, RIC enhances motor learning in healthy individuals. Based on these diversified benefits of RIC, the central hypothesis is that the multifactorial mechanisms of RIC can be harnessed as a priming agent to enhance motor learning and augment neuroplasticity in children with UCP. The Specific Aims are: 1) to determine the effects of RIC + training on bimanual skill learning and bimanual coordination, and 2) to determine the effects of RIC + training on corticospinal excitability in children with UCP. In this triple blind, randomized controlled trial, 46 children with UCP, ages 6-16 years will first undergo bimanual speed stack performance, functional upper extremity, and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation assessments. Children will then undergo RIC/Sham conditioning plus training. Investigators will deliver RIC/sham conditioning via cyclic inflation and deflation of a pressure cuff on the paretic arm using a standard protocol. Training will involve 5 days (15 trials/day) of bimanual speed stack training for 5 days. The children will perform the same baseline assessments post-intervention. Investigators hypothesize that compared to sham conditioning + training, RIC + training will significantly enhance: 1) bimanual skill performance (decrease in movement time (sec) to complete bimanual speed stack task), 2) bimanual coordination and bimanual function (improvement in kinematic variables and increase in the Assisting Hand Assessment scores), 3) cortical excitability in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) (larger amplitude of motor evoked potentials and lower resting or active motor thresholds), and 4) reduce motor cortex inhibition (reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition and increase in intracortical facilitation in ipsilesional M1). The long-term goal is to develop effective interventions to improve function of children with UCP. Outcomes of this project will provide critical ingredients for designing Phase II trials that will determine the effects of RIC combined with different dose of intensive behavioral interventions to improve functional outcomes in children with UCP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

East Carolina University is the lead sponsor of 83 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP)
  2. Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels I-III
  3. Ability to complete a stack of 3 cups in 1 minute
  4. Mainstream in school

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children with other developmental disabilities such as autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, developmental coordination disorders, etc.
  2. Children with absent active motor threshold
  3. Children with known cardiorespiratory, vascular, and metabolic disorders
  4. Children with neoplasm and hydrocephalus
  5. Children who are currently receiving or received other adjunct therapies such as rTMS and tDCS in the past 6 months
  6. Children with seizures within last 2 years and on anti-seizure medications
  7. Children with metal implants and incompatible medical devices
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)

    RIC is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to at least 20 mmHg above systolic blood pressure to 250 mmHg on the more involved arm. RIC involves 5 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation and requires 45 minutes. RIC is performed on visits 1-7.

    Behavioral: Bimanual Cup Stacking Training

  • Sham comparator
    Sham conditioning

    Sham conditioning is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to 25 mmHg on the more involved arm. RIC involves 5 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation and requires 45 minutes. RIC is performed on visits 1-7.

    Behavioral: Bimanual Cup Stacking Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralBimanual Cup Stacking Training

    Children practices bimanual cup stacking, 15 trials/day for 5 consecutive days

    Also known as: Remote limb ischemic conditioning, Sham conditioning

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Bimanual Learning

    The time (seconds) to complete each trial of cup stack, which will be averaged across nine trials. This will be measured at visit 1 (pre-) and visit 7 (post-intervention).

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  2. Change in Symmetric performance and tangential velocities

    Symmetric performance is characterized as a time-lag between the affected and less affected arm during movement onset and task completion.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  3. Change in Resting Motor Threshold (rMT)

    The rMT is the stimulator output required to produce a motor evoked potential (MEP) of \> 50 μV in at least 5/10 trials in FDI muscle.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  4. Change in Active Motor Threshold (aMT)

    The aMT is the stimulator output required to produce a motor evoked potential (MEP) of \> 200 μV in FDI muscle during 30% of MVIC of FDI muscle using a pinch grip. aMT is a measure of motor cortex excitability.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Assisting Hand Assessment

    Assisting Hand Assessment assesses bimanual coordination and affected hand function. A 5-point change from pre- to post-intervention is considered a clinically meaningful improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  2. Change in Hand Trajectory

    Hand trajectory is defined as the resultant 3D path length between the starting position and task completion.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  3. Change in Temporal coupling (normalized movement overlap time)

    Normalized movement overlap time is calculated as the percentage of total task completion time that both hands are participating in the stacking sequence during bimanual coordination task

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  4. Change in total participation time of each hand

    Total participation time is calculated as the total amount of time the affected and the less affected hand participate in bimanual coordination task. A hand will be considered as participating in the task any time the wrist marker tangential velocity remains over 2.0 cm/s for at least 100 ms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  5. Change in Goal Synchronization

    Goal synchronization is defined as a time lag between the initiation of the affected compared to the unaffected arm

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  6. Change in total task duration

    Total task duration is defined as the duration from movement onset until the criteria for task completion is reached with both hands.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  7. Change in Stimulus response curve

    stimulus-response curves will be constructed for the ipsilesional as well as contralesional M1 at intensities of 90%, 100%, 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, and 150% of rMT (10 stimuli per intensity in random order). The peak-to-peak amplitude of MEPs and area under the curve of resultant MEPs to these intensities will be calculated.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  8. Change in Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) amplitude

    The peak-to-peak amplitude of the EMG response from the affected as well as unaffected FDI muscle while stimulating the ipsilesional as well as contralesional motor cortex will be recorded at 100% rMT and averaged across 10 single-pulse trials. MEP amplitude indicates the strength of motor response to TMS.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

  9. Change in Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF)

    SICI and ICF will be obtained by applying a conditioning stimulus at 80% rMT intensity or AMT intensity followed by a test stimulus at 120% rMT intensity over the hot spot. The interstimulus interval between the conditioning and test stimulus will be 3 ms for obtaining measures of SICI and 15 ms for obtaining ICF.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dept. of Physical Therapy, East Carolina University
    Greenville, North Carolina 27834, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kharbanda RK, Nielsen TT, Redington AN. Translation of remote ischaemic preconditioning into clinical practice. Lancet. 2009 Oct 31;374(9700):1557-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61421-5. PubMed 19880021 ↗
  • Dirnagl U, Becker K, Meisel A. Preconditioning and tolerance against cerebral ischaemia: from experimental strategies to clinical use. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Apr;8(4):398-412. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70054-7. PubMed 19296922 ↗
  • Gidday JM. Cerebral preconditioning and ischaemic tolerance. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jun;7(6):437-48. doi: 10.1038/nrn1927. PubMed 16715053 ↗
  • Stetler RA, Leak RK, Gan Y, Li P, Zhang F, Hu X, Jing Z, Chen J, Zigmond MJ, Gao Y. Preconditioning provides neuroprotection in models of CNS disease: paradigms and clinical significance. Prog Neurobiol. 2014 Mar;114:58-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.005. Epub 2014 Jan 2. PubMed 24389580 ↗
  • Mattlage AE, Sutter EN, Bland MD, Surkar SM, Gidday JM, Lee JM, Hershey T, Chen L, Lang CE. Dose of remote limb ischemic conditioning for enhancing learning in healthy young adults. Exp Brain Res. 2019 Jun;237(6):1493-1502. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05519-w. Epub 2019 Mar 26. PubMed 30915491 ↗
  • Sutter EN, Mattlage AE, Bland MD, Cherry-Allen KM, Harrison E, Surkar SM, Gidday JM, Chen L, Hershey T, Lee JM, Lang CE. Remote Limb Ischemic Conditioning and Motor Learning: Evaluation of Factors Influencing Response in Older Adults. Transl Stroke Res. 2019 Aug;10(4):362-371. doi: 10.1007/s12975-018-0653-8. Epub 2018 Aug 7. PubMed 30088217 ↗
  • Surkar SM, Bland MD, Mattlage AE, Chen L, Gidday JM, Lee JM, Hershey T, Lang CE. Effects of remote limb ischemic conditioning on muscle strength in healthy young adults: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020 Feb 4;15(2):e0227263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227263. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32017777 ↗
  • Surkar SM, Willson JD, Cassidy JM, Kantak S, Patterson CG. Remote ischaemic conditioning combined with bimanual task training to enhance bimanual skill learning and corticospinal excitability in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: a study protocol of a single centre, phase II randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 28;13(9):e076881. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076881. PubMed 37770277 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data will be shared on NIH figshare network and will be made available on request.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05777070
Lead sponsor
East Carolina University
Responsible party
Swati Manoharrao Surkar (Assistant Professor, East Carolina University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 20, 2023
Start date
Nov 7, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
May 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 14, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion