CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05761990Updated Mar 9, 2023

Novel Stretching Versus Post Isometric Relaxation Techniques On Shoulder Disability In Athletes

An interventional study of POST ISOMTERIC RELAXATION TECHNIQUE and NOVEL STRETCHING in Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-09.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2022, registered Nov 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It was a randomized control trial in which thirty (30) participants having GRID, age between 20-40 years were randomly allocated into two groups i-e NS (Novel stretching) Group (30) and PIR (posterior isometric relaxation techniques) Group (30), February 2022 to March 2022.PIR group received the posterior isometric relaxation techniques (three times a week for one month) and NS group received the Novel stretching (three times a week for one month). IR ROM was measured with a goniometer while pain was measured with Numeric Pain Rating Scale intervention and disability of arm, shoulder and hand was measured with DASH score before, immediately, and at week 4 post intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit

Keywords

  • range of motion,pain,shoulder,stretching
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female
  • Between the ages of 18 and 40
  • Athletes with glenohumeral internal deficit
  • Basketball, tennis, javelin, squash, swimmers, volleyball, and weightlifter
  • participated in local and regional sporting events
  • showed a 10° or higher variation in Internal rotation range of motion between shoulders (dominant versus non-dominant)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Footballer, cricketer, and hockey player
  • Recovering from extensive shoulder and elbow surgery that was performed three months ago.
  • presently undergoing medical intervention for the shoulder
  • Suffer from a life-threatening illness
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    POST ISOMTERIC RELAXATION TECHNIQUES

    Participants in Group A will instruct to perform the PIR techniques These steps are taken when using the PIR approach: * Stretching the hypertonic muscle to the point when movement resistance is initially felt or just past the point of discomfort. * For 5 to 10 seconds, a submaximal (10-20%) hypertonic muscle contraction is carried out away from the barrier while resistance is supplied in the other side. To help with this, the individual should breathe in. * The individual is told to relax while breathing after the isometric contraction. After then, until the next barrier is reached, a gentle stretch is employed to pick up the slack. * Starting with this new barrier, the procedure is carried out two or three more times.

    Other: POST ISOMTERIC RELAXATION TECHNIQUE

  • Experimental
    NOVEL STRETCHING

    The NS will be performed in a supine posture for Group B participants. Participants will be instructed to open their knees while wearing a resistance band around their knees. Participant will be instructed to bridge as high as he can while keeping his shoulders 90 ° abducted and his elbows 90 ° flexed. By lifting the body weight upward, the bridging motion pins the scapula's medial border against the thorax without immediately squeezing or constricting the posterior shoulder bones. This position is thought to provide more flexibility of mobility while causing less discomfort. The subjects were instructed to hold this position while tightening or "squeezing" their gluteal muscles. They were also instructed to stretch by jerkily turning their shoulders inward as far as possible. Using the second hand, the stretch was pushed forward to the point of mild discomfort while contraction was maintained.

    Other: NOVEL STRETCHING

Interventions

  • OtherPOST ISOMTERIC RELAXATION TECHNIQUE

    POST ISOMETRIC RELAXATION TECHNIQUES * Stretching the hypertonic muscle to the point when movement resistance is initially felt or just past the point of discomfort. * For 5 to 10 seconds, a submaximal (10-20%) hypertonic muscle contraction is carried out away from the barrier while resistance is supplied in the other side. To help with this, the individual should breathe in. * The individual is told to relax while breathing after the isometric contraction. After then, until the next barrier is reached, a gentle stretch is employed to pick up the slack. * Starting with this new barrier, the procedure is carried out two or three more times.

  • OtherNOVEL STRETCHING

    NOVEL STRETCHING The NS will be performed in a supine posture for Group B participants. Participants will be instructed to open their knees while wearing a resistance band around their knees. Participant will be instructed to bridge as high as he can while keeping his shoulders 90 ° abducted and his elbows 90 ° flexed. By lifting the body weight upward, the bridging motion pins the scapula's medial border against the thorax without immediately squeezing or constricting the posterior shoulder bones. This position is thought to provide more flexibility of mobility while causing less discomfort. The subjects were instructed to hold this position while tightening or "squeezing" their gluteal muscles. They were also instructed to stretch by jerkily turning their shoulders inward as far as possible. Using the second hand, the stretch was pushed forward to the point of mild discomfort while contraction was maintained.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. numeric pain rating scale

    A respondent uses the Numeric pain rating scale, a numerical variant of the visual analogue scale (VAS), to select a whole number (0-10 integers) that best captures the severity of their pain.

    Time frame: 4weeks

  2. RANGE OF MOTION

    The ROM is measured by GONIOMETER

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Disability of arm,shoulder and hand score

    The DASH is a 30-item questionnaire that offers response options using 5-point Likert scales. Scores vary from 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability) (most severe disability). This score was created to help patients with any upper-limb musculoskeletal problem

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Muhammad Sulaman
    Multān, Punjab 75500, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lacheta L, Horan MP, Nolte PC, Goldenberg BT, Dekker TJ, Millett PJ. SLAP Repair Versus Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Isolated SLAP Type 2 Lesions in Overhead Athletes Younger Than 35 Years: Comparison of Minimum 2-Year Outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 21;10(6):23259671221105239. doi: 10.1177/23259671221105239. eCollection 2022 Jun. PubMed 35757237 ↗
  • Jung JW, Kim YK. Scapular Dyskinesis in Elite Boxers with Neck Disability and Shoulder Malfunction. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 9;57(12):1347. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121347. PubMed 34946291 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05761990
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 9, 2023
Start date
Jul 17, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 17, 2022
Completion
Sep 17, 2022
Last update
Mar 9, 2023

Study contacts

Muhammad Sanaullah, MS
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion