ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05761275Updated Mar 27, 2025

Assessment of Women's Sexual Quality of Life After Benign Adnexal Surgery Using vNOTES Approach

An interventional study of Elective cystectomy and Elective oophorectomy in Gynecologic Disease, Adnexal Mass and Adnexal Cyst, sponsored by Jean Dubuisson. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-27.

Primary conditionDyspareuniaRegistry: Genital Diseases, FemaleReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Genital Diseases, Female — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Dyspareunia
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Dyspareunia, a narrower term within Genital Diseases, Female.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Jean Dubuisson · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) is a recent innovation in minimally invasive surgery which has already proven its non-inferiority to conventional abdominal laparoscopy (CAL) for hysterectomy in terms of efficiency and safety. However, the investigators note a lack of medical literature and no specific randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing women's sexual function after vNOTES for benign adnexal surgery.

The aim of this RCT is to confirm the non-inferiority of the vNOTES approach for benign adnexal pathology compared to CAL on women's sexual function. Secondary outcomes will evaluate vNOTES's efficiency, morbidity and postoperative complications compared to CAL for benign adnexal surgery. The relationship between adnexal mass morcellation/aspiration and the quality of the histological analysis on surgical specimens will also be evaluated as secondary outcome.

Read the detailed description

This study focuses on women aged 18 to 70 who require surgery for benign adnexal disease (removal of an ovarian cyst, ovary and/or fallopian tube). This is a randomised study, i.e. each woman will be randomly assigned the surgical technique used for the planned operation, either vNOTES or conventional transabdominal laparoscopy.

Currently, there are no randomised clinical trials specifically investigating the impact on women's sexual quality of life after benign adnexal surgery compared to conventional transabdominal laparoscopy. Patients appear to be more reticent about the vaginal approach to surgery due to fear of possible alteration of their sexual activity afterwards. Indeed, their fears relate to the vaginal scarring that occurs during the vNOTES surgery. The vaginal scar could cause vaginal pain and pain during sexual intercourse, especially if there is a post-operative complication with the vaginal scar. The vaginal scar could also alter women's perception of their bodies during sexual intercourse. This study is necessary to answer these questions and increase women's acceptance of the vNOTES technique for benign adnexal surgery. In this way, women would benefit from the advantages of vNOTES without fearing an impact on their sexual quality of life.

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that the vNOTES technique, although using the vagina as an entry route, does not significantly alter the quality of sexual life of women after benign adnexal surgery compared to conventional transabdominal laparoscopy.

The secondary objectives of this study evaluate the effectiveness of vNOTES (impact on pain, length of stay after surgery and patient satisfaction), complications ( during surgery and up to 30 days after surgery), as well as the relationship between the need to cut the surgical specimen for extraction and the difficulty of microscopic analysis.

All participants in the study, regardless of the surgical technique assigned to them, will complete questionnaires to assess their quality of sexual life before surgery and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. These are the FSFI (female sexual function), CSI-16 (couple satisfaction) and a self-created questionnaire on pain during sex (dyspareunia). These questionnaires will determine whether there is a difference in the women's quality of sexual life before and after surgery, as well as comparing the two surgical techniques. The participants' general and medical data will be collected at the time of study enrolment, during hospitalisation and at one month after surgery to assess the secondary objectives of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gynecologic Disease
  • Adnexal Mass
  • Adnexal Cyst
  • Sexuality
  • Adnexal Diseases
  • Sexual Dysfunction
  • Quality of Life
  • Pathology
  • Dyspareunia
  • Pelvic Pain
  • Complication
03

In context

Dyspareunia Reclassified

158 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspareunia; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 62 is close to the median of 63 across 126 interventional studies indexed under Dyspareunia.

Browse Dyspareunia studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Jean Dubuisson as lead sponsor.

Compared within Dyspareunia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Genital Diseases, Female. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged from 18 to 70 years
  • Discernment capacity with oral and written consent signed
  • Heterosexual intercourse (with vaginal penetration) within four weeks prior to inclusion in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of rectal surgery.
  • Suspected rectovaginal/retrocervical endometriosis.
  • History of brachytherapy or pelvic radiation.
  • Suspected .
  • History of severe pelvic inflammatory disease.
  • Active lower genital tract infection.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Women who do not speak fluent French or English.
  • Patients under tutelage (with or without capacity of judgement).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy

    Use of conventional transabdominal laparoscopy as the surgical approach to perform the indicated procedure in the included patient with benign adnexal pathology (elective cystectomy/oophorectomy elective salpingectomy or tubal sterilization).

    Procedure: Elective cystectomy · Procedure: Elective oophorectomy · Procedure: Elective salpingectomy · Procedure: Elective tubal sterilization

  • Experimental
    vNOTES

    Use of vNOTES (Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) as the surgical approach to perform the indicated procedure in the included patient with benign adnexal pathology (elective cystectomy/oophorectomy elective salpingectomy or tubal sterilization).

    Procedure: Elective cystectomy · Procedure: Elective oophorectomy · Procedure: Elective salpingectomy · Procedure: Elective tubal sterilization

Interventions

  • ProcedureElective cystectomy

    Adnexal cyst removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.

  • ProcedureElective oophorectomy

    Ovarian removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.

  • ProcedureElective salpingectomy

    Tubal removal for presumed benign adnexal pathology.

  • ProcedureElective tubal sterilization

    Tubal obstruction as a definitive contraceptive method (tubal cauterization with or without sectioning, partial or total removal of both tubes, or obstruction with small clips/ligatures).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Women's quality of sexual life evaluation - Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    Women's sexual Quality of Life evaluation after benigne adnexal surgery by vNOTES compared to Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. FSFI, created in 2000 by Raymond Rosen, is a reliable and complete multidimensional self-reported instrument for the measurement of female sexual function. It is validated in English and assesses 19 items divided into six domains of sexual function: (a) desire (2 items), (b) subjective arousal (4 items), (c) lubrication (4 items), (d) orgasm (3 items), (e) satisfaction (3 items) and (f) pain/discomfort (3 items). Each item focuses on the situation during the last 4 weeks. The total score is the sum of answers provided for each of the 6 domains. Lower is the score, worse is the patient's sexual function. A total score below 26 defines impaired sexual function.

    Time frame: Preoperative

  2. Women's quality of sexual life evaluation - Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    Women's sexual Quality of Life evaluation after benigne adnexal surgery by vNOTES compared to Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. FSFI, created in 2000 by Raymond Rosen, is a reliable and complete multidimensional self-reported instrument for the measurement of female sexual function. It is validated in English and assesses 19 items divided into six domains of sexual function: (a) desire (2 items), (b) subjective arousal (4 items), (c) lubrication (4 items), (d) orgasm (3 items), (e) satisfaction (3 items) and (f) pain/discomfort (3 items). Each item focuses on the situation during the last 4 weeks. The total score is the sum of answers provided for each of the 6 domains. Lower is the score, worse is the patient's sexual function. A total score below 26 defines impaired sexual function.

    Time frame: 3 months postoperative

  3. Women's quality of sexual life evaluation - Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    Women's sexual Quality of Life evaluation after benigne adnexal surgery by vNOTES compared to Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. FSFI, created in 2000 by Raymond Rosen, is a reliable and complete multidimensional self-reported instrument for the measurement of female sexual function. It is validated in English and assesses 19 items divided into six domains of sexual function: (a) desire (2 items), (b) subjective arousal (4 items), (c) lubrication (4 items), (d) orgasm (3 items), (e) satisfaction (3 items) and (f) pain/discomfort (3 items). Each item focuses on the situation during the last 4 weeks. The total score is the sum of answers provided for each of the 6 domains. Lower is the score, worse is the patient's sexual function. A total score below 26 defines impaired sexual function.

    Time frame: 6 months postoperative

  4. Women's quality of sexual life evaluation - Couple Satisfaction Index-16 (CSI-16)

    Women's sexual Quality of Life evaluation after benigne adnexal surgery by vNOTES compared to Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy using the Couple Satisfaction Index-16 (CSI-16) questionnaire. CSI-16 is a precise, consistent and validated scale that evaluates the quality of a couple's relationship satisfaction. Each item is scored from 0 to 5 with different answer formats. The total score can range from 0 to 81. Higher is the total score, better is the relationship satisfaction. A relationship dissatisfaction is suggested when the total score is bellow 51,5.

    Time frame: Preoperative

  5. Women's quality of sexual life evaluation - Couple Satisfaction Index-16 (CSI-16)

    Women's sexual Quality of Life evaluation after benigne adnexal surgery by vNOTES compared to Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy using the Couple Satisfaction Index-16 (CSI-16) questionnaire. CSI-16 is a precise, consistent and validated scale that evaluates the quality of a couple's relationship satisfaction. Each item is scored from 0 to 5 with different answer formats. The total score can range from 0 to 81. Higher is the total score, better is the relationship satisfaction. A relationship dissatisfaction is suggested when the total score is bellow 51,5.

    Time frame: 3 months postoperative

  6. Women's quality of sexual life evaluation - Couple Satisfaction Index-16 (CSI-16)

    Women's sexual Quality of Life evaluation after benigne adnexal surgery by vNOTES compared to Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy using the Couple Satisfaction Index-16 (CSI-16) questionnaire. CSI-16 is a precise, consistent and validated scale that evaluates the quality of a couple's relationship satisfaction. Each item is scored from 0 to 5 with different answer formats. The total score can range from 0 to 81. Higher is the total score, better is the relationship satisfaction. A relationship dissatisfaction is suggested when the total score is bellow 51,5.

    Time frame: 6 months postoperative

  7. Women's quality of sexual life evaluation - Self reported questionnaire on dyspareunia

    Women's sexual Quality of Life evaluation after benigne adnexal surgery by vNOTES compared to Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy using a self-reported questionnaire on dyspareunia. This questionnaire assesses presence of superficial and/or deep dyspareunia together with pain intensity. Pain intensity is assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which rates the pain from 0 for no pain to 10 being the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Preoperative

  8. Women's quality of sexual life evaluation - Self reported questionnaire on dyspareunia

    Women's sexual Quality of Life evaluation after benigne adnexal surgery by vNOTES compared to Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy using a self-reported questionnaire on dyspareunia. This questionnaire assesses presence of superficial and/or deep dyspareunia together with pain intensity. Pain intensity is assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which rates the pain from 0 for no pain to 10 being the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: 3 months postoperative

  9. Women's quality of sexual life evaluation - Self reported questionnaire on dyspareunia

    Women's sexual Quality of Life evaluation after benigne adnexal surgery by vNOTES compared to Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy using a self-reported questionnaire on dyspareunia. This questionnaire assesses presence of superficial and/or deep dyspareunia together with pain intensity. Pain intensity is assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which rates the pain from 0 for no pain to 10 being the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: 6 months postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness

    Evaluation of the success rate (removal of the specimen without the need of conversion to laparoscopy or open-surgery) and the procedure duration including the need for adhesiolysis.

    Time frame: Peroperative

  2. Pain evaluation

    Mean pain intensity will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which rates the pain intensity from 0 for no pain to 10 being the worst pain imaginable. Pain location will be assessed in a descriptive form.

    Time frame: Preoperative

  3. Lenght of stay

    Evaluation of lenght of stay in days ranging from 0 for the day of the intervention to 30 for the 30th day after the intervention.

    Time frame: During hospital stay, from day of the surgery up to 30 days after surgery

  4. Pain evaluation

    Pain intensity will be evaluated every day with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which rates the pain intensity from 0 for no pain to 10 being the worst pain imaginable. Names and classes of painkillers taken will be recorded daily during hospitalisation, noting the total milligram dosage per 24 hours for each drug (class 1 for simple analgesics, class 2 for addition of morphine derivatives, class 3 for morphine and morphine derivatives).

    Time frame: During hospital stay, from day of the surgery up to 30 days after surgery

  5. Pain evaluation

    Mean pain intensity will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which rates the pain intensity from 0 for no pain to 10 being the worst pain imaginable. Pain location will be assessed in a descriptive form. Assessment of analgesic intake and class of painkillers when used (class 1 for simple analgesics, class 2 for addition of morphine derivatives, class 3 for morphine and morphine derivatives).

    Time frame: 1 month postoperative

  6. Complications rate

    Failure to enter the peritoneal cavity, need for conversion, intraoperative complication during peritoneal cavity access, intraoperative blood loss, bowel or vessel injury.

    Time frame: Peroperative

  7. Complications rate

    Delayed vaginal or parietal healing (abscess, hematoma, dehiscence), trocar-site hernia, trocar-site nerve injury, re-hospitalization and re-operation.

    Time frame: 1 month postoperative

  8. Histological analysis after morcellation/aspiration of the surgical specimen

    Histological analysis after morcellation/aspiration of the surgical specimen : completed/ limited and diagnosis.

    Time frame: Peroperative

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05761275
Lead sponsor
Jean Dubuisson
Responsible party
Jean Dubuisson (Principal Investigator, University Hospital, Geneva) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 9, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 3, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2025

Study contacts

Eloïse Krull
Contact
eloise.krull@bluewin.ch
+41 (0)22 372 68 16
Jean Dubuisson
Contact
Jean.Dubuisson@hcuge.ch
Jean Dubuisson
principal investigator · University Hospital, Geneva

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion