An interventional study of Education plus Support in Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, sponsored by California State University, San Marcos. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.
Sponsored by California State University, San Marcos · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
This study tests of effect of brief education and support about tobacco, e-cigarette, and cannabis waste (TECW) on knowledge, beliefs, behavior, and TECW on two college campuses.
1,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Behavior; 313 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 406 is above the median of 120 across 1,197 interventional studies indexed under Behavior.
Browse Behavior studies →California State University, San Marcos is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Treatment as usual with brief videos and weblink
Behavioral: Education plus Support
Education plus motivational enhancement
Behavioral: Education plus Support
Brief behavioral support for using TECW Tracker
Also known as: Motivational Enhancement
Knowledge about TECW
Percent correct on 12-item knowledge test based on Protect our Planet: The Earth is Not Disposable (California Youth Advocacy Network) and Environmental Impact of Cigarette Butts (Tobacco Free CA) videos. Higher scores reflect more accurate knowledge about TECW
Time frame: 6 weeks
Perceived harmfulness of TECW
Questions adapted from Epperson et al. (2021) and Hoek et al. (2020); score ranges from 1-5, higher scores reflect greater perceived harm
Time frame: 6 weeks
Belief that TEC manufacturers should be accountable for waste mitigation
Questions adapted from Hoek et al. (2020); score ranges from 1-4, higher scores reflect stronger regulatory belief
Time frame: 6 weeks
Use of TECW Tracker
Number of reports received in ArcGIS-based TECW Tracker program
Time frame: 6 weeks
Readiness to engage in regulatory behavior
Questions adapted from Pulvers (2022); scores range from 1-5; higher scores reflect greater regulatory readiness
Time frame: 6 weeks
Plan to share: No
Ran from Mar 2023 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 20 months.
Of 741 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Behavior, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32. This study's 20 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 757 studies reached it within 13 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32.
Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 26, 2026: primary completion Oct 2024 → Nov 2024 and completion Jun 2026 → Jun 2025.
Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
California State University, San Marcos