ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05750966COBRAUpdated Jun 11, 2026

Short-course Antibiotics vs Standard Course Antibiotics in Patients With Cholangitis

An interventional study of cefrtriaxone, gentamicin, cefuroxim, ciprofloxin or other antibiotics according to local guideline (24 hours) and cefrtriaxone, gentamicin, cefuroxim, ciprofloxin or other antibiotics according to local guideline (4 to 7 days) in Cholangitis, sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA). Completed at 31 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.

Sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
410
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this multicentre randomized controlled trial is to investigate if a very short-course of antibiotics (1 day) for cholangitis after adequate drainage is non-inferior with respect to clinical cure in comparison with a standard course of antibiotics (4 to 7 days). Secondary objectives include:

  • Will a one-day course of antibiotics for cholangitis after adequate drainage be non-inferior with respect to relapse of cholangitis and mortality in comparison with a standard course of antibiotics?
  • Will a one-day course of antibiotics for cholangitis after adequate drainage result in less adverse drug events in comparison with a standard course of antibiotics?
  • Will a one-day course of antibiotics for cholangitis after adequate drainage reduce length of hospital stay?
  • Will a one-day course of antibiotics for cholangitis after adequate drainage improve quality of life?
  • Will a one-day course of antibiotics for cholangitis after adequate drainage be cost-effective?
Read the detailed description

Acute cholangitis is an infection of the biliary tract which is managed with biliary drainage and antibiotic therapy (ABT). Currently the international Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) recommend 4 to 7 days of ABT after source control. The national SWAB guideline of 2020 suggests a course of one to 3 days after biliary drainage. There are no randomized studies to guide the duration of ABT for acute cholangitis. Our recent retrospective study in the Netherlands showed that a short course of ABT seems safe and more evidence is available showing that other bacterial infections, including abdominal and bloodstream infections, can be treated with a short antibiotic course than previously assumed. Hence, the hypothesis is that a very short-course of ABT for acute cholangitis is non-inferior to a course of 4 to 7 days after adequate biliary drainage.

This study is designed as a multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to the intervention group (one day of antibiotic therapy after ERCP) or the comparator group (4 to 7 days of antibiotic therapy after ERCP).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholangitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • antibiotics
  • randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Cholangitis

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholangitis; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 410 is above the median of 100 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Cholangitis.

Browse Cholangitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) is the lead sponsor of 532 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with acute cholangitis due to common bile duct stones, benign or malignant distal biliary obstruction or distal biliary stent dysfunction (only stents in situ for a minimum of 30 days)
  • ERCP with adequate biliary drainage (all common bile duct stones are removed and/or there is adequate flow of clear bile with or without a biliary stent(s))
  • Absence of fever (temperature \<38.5°C) or a decrease of body temperature of at least 1°C has occurred within 24 hours after ERCP
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Written (IC)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other aetiologies of acute cholangitis (e.g. primary sclerosing cholangitis, (sub)hilar and/or intrahepatic strictures or hilar stents)
  • A recurrent cholangitis (within 3 months)
  • Patients with surgically altered anatomy (leading to biliary-enteric anastomosis)
  • Concomitant pancreatitis, according to International Association of Pancreatology/American Pancreatic Association guidelines.[18] Acute pancreatitis is diagnosed in case of fulfilment of 2 out of 3 of the following criteria:

    • Upper abdominal pain
    • Serum amylase or lipase >3x
    • Signs of acute pancreatitis on imaging
  • Concomitant cholecystitis, according to TG18 criteria.[19] Acute cholecystitis is suspected in case one item in A is met and one item in B and C.

A. Local signs of inflammation

  • A1: Murphy's sign
  • A2: Right upper quadrant mass/pain/tenderness B. Systemic signs of inflammation
  • B1: Fever
  • B2: Elevated C-reactive protein
  • B3: Elevated WBC count C. Imaging findings characteristic of acute cholecystitis

    • Concomitant liver abscess
    • Another additional infectious diagnosis
    • Admission on an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at time of randomisation
    • Use of maintenance antimicrobial therapy
    • Use of
    • Neutropenia
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
410 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Very short-course antibiotics

    The antibiotic regimens will be according to the local hospital's antibiotic guideline for cholangitis (e.g. dosage form, dosage, frequency)and/or the national SWAB guideline in the Netherlands. In the experimental group, duration of ABT after adequate drainage will be 1 day. The duration will be 4 days and can be extended to 7 days in case of gram-negative bacteraemia, according to the national SWAB guideline regarding gram-negative sepsis.

    Drug: cefrtriaxone, gentamicin, cefuroxim, ciprofloxin or other antibiotics according to local guideline (24 hours)

  • Active comparator
    Standard course antibiotics

    The antibiotic regimens will be according to the local hospital's antibiotic guideline for cholangitis, which are based on the previously mentioned national SWAB guideline. This means that the type of ABT, dosage and frequency will be comparable to the experimental group. In the comparator group treatment duration with ABT after ERCP will be according to the international well known and widely used TG18. The duration will be 4 days and can be extended to 7 days in case of gram-negative bacteraemia, according to the national SWAB guideline regarding gram-negative sepsis.

    Drug: cefrtriaxone, gentamicin, cefuroxim, ciprofloxin or other antibiotics according to local guideline (4 to 7 days)

Interventions

  • The duration of antibiotics is 24 hours after adequate biliary drainage. The choice of antibiotics will be according to local protocol and/or national Dutch SWAB guidelines. The most common antibiotics are described above, but this can differ based on allergies, local protocol or previous cultures. Drug classes may include: aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cefalosporins, fluorquinolones, sulfonamides, penicillines.

    Also known as: ceftriaxone, gentamicin, cefuroxim, ciprofloxacin

  • The duration of antibiotics is 4 to 7 days after adequate biliary drainage. The choice of antibiotics will be according to local protocol and/or national Dutch SWAB guidelines. The most common antibiotics are described above, but this can differ based on allergies, local protocol or previous cultures. Drug classes may include: aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cefalosporins, fluorquinolones, sulfonamides, penicillines.

    Also known as: ceftriaxone, gentamicin, cefuroxim, ciprofloxacin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. clinical cure rate by day 14 after ERCP without relapse by day 30

    Clinical cure is defined as the absence of both fever (\>38°C) and/or shaking chills, and initial presenting symptoms. Relapse is defined as the initiation of new antibiotic therapy for recurrent cholangitis, subsequent infection in the hepatic-pancreatic-biliary region, or any other subsequent infection possibly related to the initial episode of cholangitis.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause 90-day mortality.

    Mortality, which includes all causes.

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Relapse of cholangitis within 90 days

    Relapse is defined as the initiation of new antibiotic therapy for recurrent cholangitis, subsequent infection in the hepatic-pancreatic-biliary region, or any other subsequent infection possibly related to the initial episode of cholangitis.

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Rate of any other subsequent infection requiring antibiotic therapy within 90 days.

    Subsequent infections excluding recurrent cholangitis.

    Time frame: 90 days

  4. Rate of subsequent infections with MDR bacteria or Clostridioides difficile within 90 days.

    Subsequent infections, in particular due to resistant bacteria.

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Rate of other adverse drug events within 14 days

    Includes: rash, diarrhoea (defined as ≥3 x loose stools per day), liver function abnormalities (defined as ≥5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) elevation in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or ≥2 x ULN elevation in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) or ≥3 x ULN elevation in ALT and simultaneous elevation of total bilirubin concentration exceeding 2 x ULN (according to European association for the Study of the Liver Clinical Practice Guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury) AND without evidence of persistent obstruction on imaging OR elevation of liver enzymes after initial decrease. Lastly, other adverse drug events includes acute kidney injury, defined as increase in serum creatinine by ≥26.5 micromol/L within 48 hours or increase in serum creatinine to ≥1.5 times baseline (according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines).

    Time frame: 14 days

  6. Length of intensive care and hospital stay for the initial episode of cholangitis.

    Length of IC and hospital stay defined in days.

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Quality of life and health utility.

    This will be evaluated using the RAND-36 and EQ-5D-5L at day 7, day 30 and day 90. Scale title (RAND-36): Research and Devevelopment-36 Minimum raw score: 45 Maximum raw score : 198 Higher scores mean a better outcome. Scale title (EQ-5D-5L): European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels score Minimum score: 11111 Maximum score: 55555 Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 90 days

  8. Societal costs and cost-effectiveness/-utility

    The costs per cured patient without relapse and the costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) Scale Title: Quality Adjusted Life Year. One quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is equal to 1 year of life in perfect health.QALYs are calculated by estimating the years of life remaining for a patient following a particular treatment or intervention and weighting each year with a quality-of-life score (on a 0 to 1 scale). Minimum score: 0 Maximum score: 1 Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

31 sites
  • Flevoziekenhuis
    Almere Stad, Flevoland 1315 RA, Netherlands
  • Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
    Arnhem, Gelderland 6815 AD, Netherlands
  • Radboud umc
    Nijmegen, Gelderland 6525 GA, Netherlands
  • Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
    Nijmegen, Gelderland 6532 SZ, Netherlands
  • Maastricht UMC+
    Maastricht, Limburg 6229 HX, Netherlands
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
    's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant 5223 GZ, Netherlands
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis
    Eindhoven, North Brabant 5623 EJ, Netherlands
  • Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis
    Tilburg, North Brabant 5022 GC, Netherlands
  • Amstelland Ziekenhuis
    Amstelveen, North Holland 1186 AM, Netherlands
  • Amsterdam UMC
    Amsterdam, North Holland 1081 HZ, Netherlands
  • OLVG
    Amsterdam, North Holland 1091 AC, Netherlands
  • Spaarne Gasthuis
    Hoofddorp, North Holland 2134 TM, Netherlands
  • Dijklander Ziekenhuis
    Hoorn, North Holland 1624 AR, Netherlands
  • Zaans Medisch Centrum
    Zaandam, North Holland 1502 DV, Netherlands
  • Deventer Ziekenhuis
    Deventer, Overijssel 7416 SE, Netherlands
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
    Enschede, Overijssel 7512 KZ, Netherlands
  • Isala
    Zwolle, Overijssel 8025 AB, Netherlands
  • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
    Leeuwarden, Provincie Friesland 8934 AD, Netherlands
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
    Groningen, Provincie Groningen 9713 GZ, Netherlands
  • Martini Ziekenhuis
    Groningen, Provincie Groningen 9728 NT, Netherlands
  • Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis
    Delft, South Holland 2625 AD, Netherlands
  • Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
    Dordrecht, South Holland 3318 AT, Netherlands
  • Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
    Gouda, South Holland 2803 HH, Netherlands
  • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
    Leiden, South Holland 2333 ZA, Netherlands
  • Alrijne Ziekenhuis
    Leiderdorp, South Holland 2353 GA, Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC
    Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, Netherlands
  • Maasstad Ziekenhuis
    Rotterdam, South Holland 3079 DZ, Netherlands
  • Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
    The Hague, South Holland 2512 VA, Netherlands
  • Meander MC
    Amersfoort, Utrecht 3813 TZ, Netherlands
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
    Nieuwegein, Utrecht 3435 CM, Netherlands
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
    Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CX, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Miura F, Okamoto K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Pitt HA, Gomi H, Solomkin JS, Schlossberg D, Han HS, Kim MH, Hwang TL, Chen MF, Huang WS, Kiriyama S, Itoi T, Garden OJ, Liau KH, Horiguchi A, Liu KH, Su CH, Gouma DJ, Belli G, Dervenis C, Jagannath P, Chan ACW, Lau WY, Endo I, Suzuki K, Yoon YS, de Santibanes E, Gimenez ME, Jonas E, Singh H, Honda G, Asai K, Mori Y, Wada K, Higuchi R, Watanabe M, Rikiyama T, Sata N, Kano N, Umezawa A, Mukai S, Tokumura H, Hata J, Kozaka K, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Yokoe M, Kimura T, Kitano S, Inomata M, Hirata K, Sumiyama Y, Inui K, Yamamoto M. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: initial management of acute biliary infection and flowchart for acute cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):31-40. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.509. Epub 2018 Jan 8. PubMed 28941329 ↗
  • Sieswerda E, Bax HI, Hoogerwerf JJ, de Boer MGJ, Boermeester M, Bonten MJM, Dekker D, van Wijk RG, Juffermans NP, Kuindersma M, van der Linden PD, Melles DC, Pickkers P, Schouten JA, Rebel JR, van Zanten ARH, Prins JM, Wiersinga WJ. The 2021 Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy of sepsis in adults. BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 11;22(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07653-3. PubMed 35953772 ↗
  • Haal S, Wielenga MCB, Fockens P, Leseman CA, Ponsioen CY, van Soest EJ, van Wanrooij RLJ, Sieswerda E, Voermans RP. Antibiotic Therapy of 3 Days May Be Sufficient After Biliary Drainage for Acute Cholangitis: A Systematic Review. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Dec;66(12):4128-4139. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06820-3. Epub 2021 Jan 19. PubMed 33462749 ↗
  • Overdevest AG, Sieswerda E, Haal S, Bogaards JA, Baven-Pronk MAMC, Bogte A, Boparai KS, Ter Borg F, Brink MA, van Delft F, Dik VK, Fockens P, Gilissen LPL, Hadithi M, Hazen WL, van der Heide F, den Hollander WJ, Inderson A, de Jonge PJF, Kuiken SD, Munneke JM, Perk LE, Poen AC, Poley JW, Quispel R, Scheffer RCH, Scholvinck DW, van Soest EJ, Tan ACITL, Thijs WJ, Venneman NG, Verdonk RC, van de Vrie W, Vrolijk JM, van Wanrooij RLJ, Weijenborg PW, Dijkgraaf MGW, Prins JM, Voermans RP. Antibiotic treatment for 1 day versus 4-7 days in patients with acute cholangitis after adequate endoscopic biliary drainage (COBRA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2026 Feb 14;27(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09524-7. PubMed 41689066 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 32 months.

Of 21 interventional studies with no phase under Cholangitis, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 68. This study's 32 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 3, 2023
First posted
Mar 2, 2023
StartActual
Jul 19, 2023
Primary completionActual
Apr 1, 2026
CompletionActual
Jun 1, 2026
Last update
Jun 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05750966
Collaborators
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Responsible party
Rogier P. Voermans (Principal Investigator, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 2, 2023
Start date
Jul 19, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2026
Completion
Jun 1, 2026
Last update
Jun 11, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ceftriaxone

Start the discussion