CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05741489Updated Apr 5, 2024Results posted

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease and Burnt-Out Diabetes

An interventional study of Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in End Stage Kidney Disease, sponsored by Emory University. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-05.

Sponsored by Emory University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2022, registered Feb 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Twenty participants with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) and burnt-out diabetes, and 20 non-diabetic participants with ESKD will wear a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device for 10 days to see if the use of CGM is a better tool to assess glycemic control than glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with ESKD on dialysis.

Read the detailed description

More than 37 million adults, or 14.7% of all Americans aged 18 and older, are living with diabetes. Controlling hyperglycemia is foundational to diabetes management and is necessary to reduce the risks of chronic diabetes complications and death. Diabetic nephropathy accounts for great morbidity, as diabetes is the number one cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the United States. It is estimated that diabetes affects up to 40% of patients with ESKD.

Assessment of glucose control in patients with advanced CKD/ESKD is complex due to changes in glucose homeostasis, potential effects on assays of glycemia, and altered pharmacokinetics of diabetes medications. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has been the gold standard to assess glycemic control in patients with diabetes. HbA1c reflects the average glycemic value over approximately 3 months. Although HbA1c is associated with chronic complications of diabetes in patients with normal kidney function, its predictive value is uncertain in patients with ESKD or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 ml/min. HbA1c reliability in ESKD is reduced because of anemia, shortened erythrocyte lifespan, protein-energy wasting, and malnutrition-inflammation cachexia syndrome, among others. To overcome the limitations of HbA1c, alternative methods to assess long-term glycemic control have been proposed including fructosamine and glycated albumin. Fructosamine measures ketoamines formed by non-enzymatic glycation of serum proteins. It is a useful index for glycemic control over the prior 2 to 4 weeks, and some studies have reported that fructosamine more accurately reflects blood glucose control than HbA1c in anemic patients with ESKD on dialysis. However, there may be falsely low readings in the presence of hypoalbuminemia due to protein-energy wasting and in peritoneal dialysis due to dialysate protein loss. Glycated albumin is a useful marker reflecting glycemic control over the prior 2 to 4 weeks. In patients with ESKD, glycated albumin more rapidly reflects the status of blood glucose control than HbA1c. Like fructosamine, there is potential for falsely low readings in patients with peritoneal dialysis with dialysate protein losses and hypoalbuminemia.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology in the outpatient setting has transformed glucose monitoring for diabetes self-management, providing more comprehensive glycemic control data than intermittent point-of-care capillary blood glucose monitoring and HbA1c.

Once progressed to ESKD, up to one fourth of patients experience resolution of their hyperglycemia, as defined by an HbA1c level of less than 6.5%, and consequently are no longer on antidiabetic agents and insulin. This phenomenon is known as "burnt-out diabetes" which is likely due to various underlying factors, including but not limited to, malnutrition, reduced clearance and degradation of insulin, decreased kidney gluconeogenesis, and accumulation of uremic toxins. These patients are likely at a greater risk of morbidity and mortality and an increased risk of hypoglycemic episodes. There is a need for further research in patients with ESKD to establish what is the most appropriate tool to assess glycemic control in those with 'burnt-out diabetes'.

This study will use CGM to measure patients' glucose with real-time levels as opposed to relying on surrogate markers like HbA1c. These results can give insight into the reality of glycemic control in these patients and can impact the best monitoring and treatment for patients with burnt-out diabetes. It is not known if patients with burnt-out diabetes have complete normoglycemia or if they may have episodes of (untreated) hyperglycemia, which may be associated with poor outcomes. The researchers of this study will compare glycemic control by CGM in patients with burnt-out diabetes and non-diabetic patients with ESKD.

02

Conditions studied

  • End Stage Kidney Disease

Keywords

  • Burnt-out diabetes
  • Dialysis
  • End stage renal disease
  • Kidney failure
03

In context

Kidney Diseases

3,840 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Diseases; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 70 across 2,640 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Diseases.

Browse Kidney Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Emory University is the lead sponsor of 1,386 studies on the registry; 236 are open to participants now.

Of its 229 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 174 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Dialysis treatment for more than 3 months
  • HbA1c less than 6.5% at the first clinic visit
  • Willing to wear a CGM for 10 days

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have used insulin or any diabetes treatment during the last 3 months
  • Be pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study
  • Known allergy to medical-grade adhesives
  • Taking acetaminophen (more than 1 gram every six hours) or hydroxyurea (may interfere with sensor membrane)
  • Current or anticipated use of stress steroid doses (prednisone \</= 5 mg or its equivalent is allowed)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ESKD with Burnt-out Diabetes

    Participants with ESKD and burnt-out diabetes wearing a CGM for 10 days.

    Device: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

  • Experimental
    ESKD without Diabetes

    Non-diabetic participants with ESKD wearing a CGM for 10 days.

    Device: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

Interventions

  • DeviceContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

    The Dexcom G6 CGM system is a compact, light-weight glucose testing device that measures glucose every 5 minutes. Participants will wear the CGM with the display off for 10 days while continuing their routine dialysis sessions.

    Also known as: Dexcom G6 CGM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of Time in Range (TIR) Between 70-180 mg/dL

    Glycemic control is measured as the percentage of time that blood glucose levels are in the range of 70 and 180 mg/dL, as measured by CGM.

    Time frame: Up to 10 days

  2. Percent of Time Above Range (Blood Glucose >180 mg/dL)

    Glycemic control is assessed a the percentage of time in hyperglycemia, defined as the time above range (TAR) with blood glucose measurements \>180 mg/dL, as measured by CGM.

    Time frame: Up to 10 days

  3. Percent of Time Above Range (Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL)

    Glycemic control is assessed a the percentage of time in hyperglycemia, defined as the time above range (TAR) with blood glucose measurements \>250 mg/dL, as measured by CGM.

    Time frame: Up to 10 days

  4. Duration of Hyperglycemia (Blood Glucose >180 mg/dL)

    Glycemic control is assessed as the duration of hyperglycemia with blood glucose measurements \>180 mg/dL, as measured by CGM for hyperglycemia time periods of greater than 15 minutes.

    Time frame: Up to 10 days

  5. Duration of Hyperglycemia (Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL)

    Glycemic control is assessed as the duration of hyperglycemia with blood glucose measurements \>250 mg/dL, as measured by CGM for hyperglycemia time periods of greater than 15 minutes.

    Time frame: Up to 10 days

  6. Number of Participants With Hyperglycemic Episodes With Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL

    The number of participants experiencing hyperglycemia with blood glucose levels \> 250 mg/dL as measured by CGM.

    Time frame: Up to Day 10

  7. Percent of Time Below Range (Blood Glucose <70 mg/dL)

    Glycemic control is assessed a the percentage of time in hypoglycemia, defined as the time below range (TBR) with blood glucose measurements \< 70 mg/dL, as measured by CGM.

    Time frame: Up to 10 days

  8. Percent of Time Below Range (Blood Glucose <54 mg/dL)

    Glycemic control is assessed a the percentage of time in severe hypoglycemia, defined as the time below range (TBR) with blood glucose measurements \< 54 mg/dL, as measured by CGM.

    Time frame: Up to 10 days

  9. Hypoglycemia Event Rate

    Hypoglycemia is defined as blood glucose \< 70 mg/dL and is assessed by Dexcom G6 CGM. The hypoglycemic event rate is defined as the number of hypoglycemic events per patient per day.

    Time frame: Up to Day 10

  10. Number of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes

    The number of participants experiencing hypoglycemia with blood glucose levels \< 70 mg/dL as measured by CGM.

    Time frame: Up to Day 10

  11. Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Event Rate

    Hypoglycemia is defined as blood glucose \< 70 mg/dL and is assessed by Dexcom G6 CGM. A nocturnal hypoglycemia episode is defined as an episode occurring during the time interval of 10:00 Post Meridiem (PM) to 6:00 Ante Meridiem (AM). The hypoglycemic event rate is defined as the number of hypoglycemic events per patient per day.

    Time frame: Up to Day 10

  12. Number of Participants With Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Episodes

    The number of participants experiencing nocturnal hypoglycemia with blood glucose levels \< 70 mg/dL as measured by CGM. A nocturnal hypoglycemia episode is defined as an episode occurring during the time interval of 10:00 Post Meridiem (PM) to 6:00 Ante Meridiem (AM).

    Time frame: Up to Day 10

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration

    Glycemic control is assessed as mean daily glucose concentration, measured by Dexcom G6 CGM.

    Time frame: Up to Day 10

  2. Glycemic Variability Calculated by Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE)

    Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) is the parameter for assessing glycemic variability and is calculated based on the arithmetic mean of differences between consecutive peaks and nadirs of differences greater than one standard deviation (SD) of mean glucose values. It is designated to assess major glucose swings and exclude minor ones.

    Time frame: Up to 10 Days

07

Results

Posted Apr 5, 2024

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from Emory Dialysis centers in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Participant enrollment began August 10, 2022 and all follow-up assessments were completed by March 9, 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEnd-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Started2020
Completed2018
Not completed02

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent of Time in Range (TIR) Between 70-180 mg/dL

Glycemic control is measured as the percentage of time that blood glucose levels are in the range of 70 and 180 mg/dL, as measured by CGM.

Time frame:
Up to 10 days
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time in Range (TIR) Between 70-180 mg/dL
percentage of timeESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Percent of Time in Range (TIR) Between 70-180 mg/dL80.4 ± 14.094.0 ± 6.4
PrimaryPercent of Time Above Range (Blood Glucose >180 mg/dL)

Glycemic control is assessed a the percentage of time in hyperglycemia, defined as the time above range (TAR) with blood glucose measurements \>180 mg/dL, as measured by CGM.

Time frame:
Up to 10 days
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time Above Range (Blood Glucose >180 mg/dL)
percentage of timeESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Percent of Time Above Range (Blood Glucose >180 mg/dL)17.2 ± 14.14.6 ± 5.3
PrimaryPercent of Time Above Range (Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL)

Glycemic control is assessed a the percentage of time in hyperglycemia, defined as the time above range (TAR) with blood glucose measurements \>250 mg/dL, as measured by CGM.

Time frame:
Up to 10 days
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time Above Range (Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL)
percentage of timeESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Percent of Time Above Range (Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL)2.0 ± 3.00.1 ± 0.4
PrimaryDuration of Hyperglycemia (Blood Glucose >180 mg/dL)

Glycemic control is assessed as the duration of hyperglycemia with blood glucose measurements \>180 mg/dL, as measured by CGM for hyperglycemia time periods of greater than 15 minutes.

Time frame:
Up to 10 days
Reported as:
Mean · hours per day
Duration of Hyperglycemia (Blood Glucose >180 mg/dL)
hours per dayESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Duration of Hyperglycemia (Blood Glucose >180 mg/dL)4.1 ± 3.41.1 ± 1.3
PrimaryDuration of Hyperglycemia (Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL)

Glycemic control is assessed as the duration of hyperglycemia with blood glucose measurements \>250 mg/dL, as measured by CGM for hyperglycemia time periods of greater than 15 minutes.

Time frame:
Up to 10 days
Reported as:
Mean · hours per day
Duration of Hyperglycemia (Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL)
hours per dayESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Duration of Hyperglycemia (Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL)0.5 ± 0.70.1 ± 0.1
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Hyperglycemic Episodes With Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL

The number of participants experiencing hyperglycemia with blood glucose levels \> 250 mg/dL as measured by CGM.

Time frame:
Up to Day 10
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Hyperglycemic Episodes With Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL
ParticipantsESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Number of Participants With Hyperglycemic Episodes With Blood Glucose >250 mg/dL113
PrimaryPercent of Time Below Range (Blood Glucose <70 mg/dL)

Glycemic control is assessed a the percentage of time in hypoglycemia, defined as the time below range (TBR) with blood glucose measurements \< 70 mg/dL, as measured by CGM.

Time frame:
Up to 10 days
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time Below Range (Blood Glucose <70 mg/dL)
percentage of timeESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Percent of Time Below Range (Blood Glucose <70 mg/dL)2.5 ± 5.81.5 ± 5.0
PrimaryPercent of Time Below Range (Blood Glucose <54 mg/dL)

Glycemic control is assessed a the percentage of time in severe hypoglycemia, defined as the time below range (TBR) with blood glucose measurements \< 54 mg/dL, as measured by CGM.

Time frame:
Up to 10 days
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Percent of Time Below Range (Blood Glucose <54 mg/dL)
percentage of timeESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Percent of Time Below Range (Blood Glucose <54 mg/dL)1.3 ± 3.50.4 ± 1.7
PrimaryHypoglycemia Event Rate

Hypoglycemia is defined as blood glucose \< 70 mg/dL and is assessed by Dexcom G6 CGM. The hypoglycemic event rate is defined as the number of hypoglycemic events per patient per day.

Time frame:
Up to Day 10
Reported as:
Mean · events per patient per day
Hypoglycemia Event Rate
events per patient per dayESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Hypoglycemia Event Rate3.60 ± 7.373.44 ± 10.43
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes

The number of participants experiencing hypoglycemia with blood glucose levels \< 70 mg/dL as measured by CGM.

Time frame:
Up to Day 10
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes
ParticipantsESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Number of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes1011
PrimaryNocturnal Hypoglycemia Event Rate

Hypoglycemia is defined as blood glucose \< 70 mg/dL and is assessed by Dexcom G6 CGM. A nocturnal hypoglycemia episode is defined as an episode occurring during the time interval of 10:00 Post Meridiem (PM) to 6:00 Ante Meridiem (AM). The hypoglycemic event rate is defined as the number of hypoglycemic events per patient per day.

Time frame:
Up to Day 10
Reported as:
Mean · events per patient per day
Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Event Rate
events per patient per dayESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Event Rate1.30 ± 3.050.94 ± 2.86
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Episodes

The number of participants experiencing nocturnal hypoglycemia with blood glucose levels \< 70 mg/dL as measured by CGM. A nocturnal hypoglycemia episode is defined as an episode occurring during the time interval of 10:00 Post Meridiem (PM) to 6:00 Ante Meridiem (AM).

Time frame:
Up to Day 10
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Episodes
ParticipantsESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Number of Participants With Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Episodes74
SecondaryMean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration

Glycemic control is assessed as mean daily glucose concentration, measured by Dexcom G6 CGM.

Time frame:
Up to Day 10
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Mean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration
mg/dLESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Mean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration141.7 ± 22.2125.7 ± 13.7
SecondaryGlycemic Variability Calculated by Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE)

Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) is the parameter for assessing glycemic variability and is calculated based on the arithmetic mean of differences between consecutive peaks and nadirs of differences greater than one standard deviation (SD) of mean glucose values. It is designated to assess major glucose swings and exclude minor ones.

Time frame:
Up to 10 Days
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Glycemic Variability Calculated by Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE)
mg/dLESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without Diabetes
Glycemic Variability Calculated by Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE)54.9 ± 18.242.4 ± 9.4

Adverse events

Collected over Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the time individuals gave consent to participate in the study and continued up to Day 10.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ESKD With Burnt-out Diabetes0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
ESKD Without Diabetes0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without DiabetesTotal
Mean62.7 ± 8.360.1 ± 9.561.4 ± 8.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without DiabetesTotal
Female10818
Male101222
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without DiabetesTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American202040
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)ESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without DiabetesTotal
United States202040
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease(Participants)ESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without DiabetesTotal
Count of participants7310
Heart failure
Heart failure(Participants)ESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without DiabetesTotal
Count of participants141529
Hypertension
Hypertension(Participants)ESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without DiabetesTotal
Count of participants201838
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)(Participants)ESKD With Burnt-out DiabetesESKD Without DiabetesTotal
< 5.7%101323
5.7 to < 6.5%10717

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Grady Memorial Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30303, United States
  • Emory Dialysis at Northside
    Atlanta, Georgia 30318, United States
  • Emory Dialysis at Greenbriar
    Atlanta, Georgia 30331, United States
  • Emory Dialysis at Candler
    Decatur, Georgia 30034, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kaminski CY, Galindo RJ, Navarrete JE, Zabala Z, Moazzami B, Gerges A, McCoy RG, Fayfman M, Vellanki P, Idrees T, Peng L, Umpierrez GE. Assessment of Glycemic Control by Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Hemoglobin A1c, Fructosamine, and Glycated Albumin in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease and Burnt-Out Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2024 Feb 1;47(2):267-271. doi: 10.2337/dc23-1276. PubMed 38085705 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 5, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05741489
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Responsible party
Guillermo Umpierrez (Professor, Emory University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 23, 2023
Start date
Aug 10, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 9, 2023
Completion
Mar 9, 2023
Results posted
Apr 5, 2024
Last update
Apr 5, 2024

Study contacts

Guillermo Umpierrez, MD
principal investigator · Emory University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion