ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05740163Updated Apr 10, 2024

Oral Immunotherapy for Egg Allergy in Children Aged 6 to 16

An interventional study of Egg product including egg white and yolk allergens in Egg Allergy, sponsored by Tampere University Hospital. Recruiting at 2 sites in Finland. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-10.

Sponsored by Tampere University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 3 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2019, registered Jan 2023).
  • Started Dec 2019; still recruiting 6 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to determine the efficacy of a 12-month egg oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocol with a cooked whole egg product including yolk and egg white.

Study hypothesis: With this method the risk for severe allergic reaction to egg protein is reduced and the diet can partly or completely be normalized.

Read the detailed description

The prevalence of egg allergy among children varies from 0.5% to 3% and is thus the second most common food allergy in children. Until recently, the only treatment for egg allergy was in many cases a life-long avoidance of egg protein. Due to the large number of egg-allergic children, oral immunotherapy (OIT) to egg has been suggested to be of probable benefit to cure children with egg-allergy. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the safety and clinical outcome of egg OIT. However, concerning efficacy and safety of egg OIT more data, and alternative procedures are required to gain a safe, simple and inexpensive immunotherapy protocol . Previous egg OIT studies have mainly used egg white in the immunotherapy, rather than more natural and inexpensive whole egg products.

The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of a 12-month egg oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocol with a cooked whole egg product including yolk and egg white. Furthermore, the effects of whole egg OIT on humoral immune responses are investigated.

The investigators hypothesize that oral administration of a whole egg product with incremental dosing will increase the individual threshold for allergic reactivity to egg protein and may result in full tolerance without any reaction to egg.

Other study aims include investigating the differences in efficacy and side effects of whole-egg OIT in children with asthma and without asthma. In this study it is hypothesized that children with asthma have more symptoms than non-asthmatic children during the treatment. Furthemore, the level of asthma control during OIT is investigated.

The study is a prospective multicenter randomized open trial, investigating the efficacy, safety and immunological mechanisms of oral egg immunotherapy in children (aged 6 to 16). Children with egg allergy, egg avoidance diet, immediate reaction in a food challenge test for egg within the last six months and elevated serum egg-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, are recruited into the study. Children with uncontrolled asthma, severe cardiovascular disease and autoimmune disease or families with poor compliance are excluded from the study.

Study participants are divided into two groups: patients with asthma and without asthma. Both groups are separately randomized into immunotherapy or follow-up without the treatment. The immunotherapy and follow-up last 12 months in total. After 12 months of enrolment, participants in the follow-up group are entitled to take actively part in the egg OIT protocol.

In immunotherapy groups (asthma or no-asthma), meatball, bun or bread roll, including well-cooked whole-egg is given daily to the patients, starting from a minimal dosage (1/200 of the protein content of whole egg) and increasing the dosing every 1-2 weeks until a dosage of 1/5 of the protein content of a whole egg is reached. The initial dosage is given at the hospital outpatient clinic. The patients and their parents will be prepared for emergency treatment of severe allergic reactions and are given instructions to carry adequate medication with them. Patients in the intervention groups take levocetrizine 5 mg or cetirizine 10 mg daily until three months of maintenance dosage.

Blood samples, skin prick tests, lung function tests and exhaled nitric oxide levels are taken from all study participants. All the above-mentioned tests are taken before the therapy and at the time points of 6 and 12 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Egg Allergy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Oral immunotherapy
  • Egg allergy
  • Children
03

In context

Egg Hypersensitivity

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Egg Hypersensitivity; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 73 across 27 interventional studies indexed under Egg Hypersensitivity.

Browse Egg Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Tampere University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 6 to 16 years
  • Elevated spesific serum IgE to egg (> 5 kU/l) and/or positive skin prick to egg allergen
  • Positive oral food challenge for egg or anaphylaxis reaction to egg within the 6 months
  • Diet free from egg in any form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 6 years or more than 16 years
  • Poor asthma control or uncontrolled asthma
  • Severe/significant cardiovascular disease
  • disease
  • Medication: beta bloker, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors), Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)
  • Poor compliance
  • Fear of immunotherapy
  • Desensitization to alfa-gal-protein (mammalian meat allergy)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Egg allergy with asthma with intervention

    Immunotherapy Egg product including egg white and yolk allergens

    Dietary Supplement: Egg product including egg white and yolk allergens

  • Experimental
    Egg allergy without asthma with intervention

    Immunotherapy Egg product including egg white and yolk allergens

    Dietary Supplement: Egg product including egg white and yolk allergens

  • No intervention
    Egg allergy with asthma without intervention

    No intervention, control

  • No intervention
    Egg allergy without asthma without intervention

    No intervention, control

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementEgg product including egg white and yolk allergens

    Egg product either meatball or bread roll or bun including egg white and yolk allergens delivered orally in increasing dosages daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of oral egg immunotherapy

    Total number of patients who achieved tolerance to egg protein during OIT (negative egg challenge) compared to the number of patients who received only partly tolerance or failed to develop any level of unresponsiveness.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety of oral egg immunotherapy

    Total number of participants with adverse events, and total number of adverse events evaluating the safety of our method

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  2. Specification of adverse reactions during egg OIT in patients without asthma

    Subjective evaluation and grading of symptoms from different organ sides during OIT, using visual analogue score 0-10 (VAS) in patients without asthma

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  3. Number and severity of anaphylactic reactions during OIT without asthma

    Number and severity of anaphylaxis during OIT (Grading of anaphylaxis using Samsons criteria, grade1-5) in patients without asthma

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  4. Specification of adverse reactions during OIT in patients with asthma

    Subjective evaluation and grading of symptoms from different organ sides during OIT, using visual analogue score 0-10 (VAS) in patients with asthma

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  5. Number and severity of anaphylactic reactions durin OIT in patients with asthma

    Number and severity of anaphylaxis in patients with asthma (Grading of anaphylaxis using Samsons criteria, grade 1-5) in patients with asthma.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  6. Effect of immunotherapy on the level of whole serum IgE

    Changing values in blood samples during OIT describing changes in whole IgE by determining values before OIT and after 6 and 12 months of OIT.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  7. Effect of immunotherapy on the level of specific egg IgE (sIgE)

    Changing values in blood samples during OIT describing changes in egg sIGE by determining values before OIT and after 6 and 12 months of OIT.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  8. Effect of immunotherapy on white blood cells

    Changing values in blood samples during OIT describing changes in the white blood-cell count by determining values before OIT and after 6 and 12 months of OIT.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  9. Effect of immunotherapy on the level of egg IgG4 (sIgG4)

    Changing values in blood samples during OIT describing changes in the egg sIgG4 by determining values before OIT and after 6 and 12 months of OIT.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  10. Effect of immunotherpay on heat stable, egg components

    Changing values in blood samples during OIT describing changes in the heat stable molecules of Gal d1 and Gal d2 by determining values before OIT and after 6 and 12 months of OIT.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  11. Effect of immunotherpay on the activity of eosinophils

    Changing values in blood samples during OIT describing changes in the level of eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) by determining values before OIT and after 6 and 12 months of OIT.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  12. Changes in parameters describing lung inflammation in patients with asthma

    Comparison of values of exhaled nitric oxide (ppb) and serum ECP (ug/l) by comparing the results 6 and 12 months after starting OIT to baseline values before OIT.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  13. Changes in parameters describing lung inflammation in patients without asthma

    Comparison of values of exhaled nitric oxide (ppb) and serum ECP (ug/l) by comparing the results 6 and 12 months after starting OIT to baseline values before OIT.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  14. Changes in lung function parameters during OIT in patients with asthma and > 7 years of age

    Effect of OIT on parameters describing lung function in children over \> 7 years of age employing flow-volume spirometry. Changing levels of FEV1 (l) and PEF (l/s) will be recorded.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  15. Changes in lung function parameters during OIT in patients with asthma < 7 years of age

    Effect of OIT on parameters describing lung function in children \< 7 years of age employing impedance oscillometry. Changing levels of 5Hz resistance (R5, kPa/l/s) and total impedance (Z5, kPa/l/s) will be recorded.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  16. Changes in lung function parameters during OIT in patients without asthma and > 7 years of age

    Effect of OIT on parameters describing lung function in children over \> 7 years of age and without ashma employing flow-volume spirometry. Changing levels of FEV1 (l) and PEF (l/s) will be recorded.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  17. Changes in lung function parameters during OIT in patients without asthma and < 7 years of age

    Effect of OIT on parameters describing lung function in children \< 7 years of age and without asthma employing impedance oscillometry. Changing levels of 5Hz resistance (R5, kPa/l/s) and total impedance (Z5, kPa/l/s) will be recorded.

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  18. Recording of asthma symptoms during egg OIT in patients with asthma

    Subjective evaluation and grading of asthmatic symptoms during OIT, using visual analogue score (VAS).

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

  19. Recording of asthma symptoms during egg OIT in patients without asthma

    Subjective evaluation and grading of asthmatic symptoms during OIT, using visual analogue score (VAS).

    Time frame: Within 12 months of study

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Oulu University Hospital
    Oulu, 90230, Finland
    Recruiting
    • Petri Kulmala, Clinical Professor · Contactpetri.kulmala@oulu.fi · +35883155534
    • Lotta Kinnunen, MD., PhD · Contact+35883155825
    • Lotta Kinnunen, MD., PhD · Sub investigator
    • Teija Dunder, MD., PhD · Sub investigator
    • Petri Kulmala, MD., PhD · Principal investigator
  • Tampere University Hospital
    Tampere, 33520, Finland
    Recruiting
    • Rüdiger Schultz, MD., PhD · Contactrudiger.schultz@pirha.fi
    • Lauri Lehtimäki, MD., PhD · Sub investigator
    • Heli Aldénv, M.Sc. · Sub investigator
    • Iida Ojaniemi, MD · Sub investigator
    • Jussi Karjalainen, MD., PhD · Sub investigator
    • Heini Huhtala, M.Sc. · Sub investigator
    • Susanna Salmivesi, MD., PhD · Sub investigator
    • Juho Kivistö, MD., PhD · Sub investigator
    • Rüdiger Schultz, MD., PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Dec 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 60 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 16, 2023
First posted
Feb 22, 2023
StartActual
Dec 30, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Apr 10, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05740163
Collaborators
University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital
Responsible party
Rudiger Schultz (Specialist in Pediatric Allergology, Tampere University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 22, 2023
Start date
Dec 30, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 10, 2024

Study contacts

Rüdiger Schultz, MD., PhD
Contact
rudiger.schultz58@gmail.com
+358
Rüdiger Schultz, MD., PhD
principal investigator · Tampere University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion