CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05732168Updated Mar 6, 2023

A Test Battery for Evaluation of Muscle Strength, Balance and Functional Performance in Subjects With Chronic Ankle Instability

An observational study in Chronic Ankle Instability, sponsored by Linnaeus University. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-06.

Sponsored by Linnaeus University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
35
Ages
15 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to investigate subjects with chronic ankle instability regarding strength, balance and functional performance with an easily used test battery that required minimal equipment. A second aim was to evaluate which of these tests that has the highest ability to discriminate impaired function between injured and non-injured ankle in CAI subjects.

Methods: This study was conducted with a cross-sectional design. A total of 20 (11 women) CAI subjects, engaged in sports, were tested for assessment of strength, balance and functional performance using the following tests; isometric strength in inversion and eversion, the single leg stance test (SLS), single leg hop for distance (SLHD) and side hop test. Additionally, 15 healthy subjects were tested with the same test battery for the evaluation of

Read the detailed description

Study design and procedure Data for cross-sectional study, adhering to the STROBE statement were collected during 2021-2022 where subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI) were evaluated with tests of strength, balance and functional performance.

Outcome measures The primary outcome was ankle function, in subjects with CAIs, which was assessed by a test battery consisting of two muscle strength tests, one balance test and two functional performance tests.

Muscle strength Ankle inversion and eversion isometric muscle strength were assessed using hand-held dynamometry, MicroFET2 (Hoggan Health Industries, Inc., Draper, UT). The subjects were examined in a lying in a prone position with the feet outside the edge with one test leader stabilizing the subject's lower leg. Before the test, the subjects tried the directions against the test leader's hand. Three maximal isometric contractions, measured in Newton (N) with 15 secs of rest between each contraction, were measured and the best attempt was used for further analysis. Five minutes of rest was used when changing test direction.

The single leg stance test (SLS) Balance was measured with the Single-leg stance test (SLS). The test began with the subject standing on one leg, with his arms straight down, and the other leg held against the calf of the standing leg. When standing steadily, the subject was asked to close their eyes and maintain balance without using opposite legs or arms. The number of times the subject corrected his balance, during 30 sec, was documented as part foot lifts. Part foot lift was defined as all parts of the foot that left the surface, e.g. toes, outside foot, heel. Putting down the opposite leg also counted as part foot lift. The total number of part foot lifts constituted a score that was used as a result.

Functional performance Functional performance was assessed by the Single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) and the 30-sec timed side hop test. Before each test, the subject had to perform three submaximal test jumps.

For the SLHD, the subject was standing on one leg with the other leg lifted from the floor. Free leg swing was allowed but the hands was placed behind the back. The subject jumped forward as far as possible, taking off and landing on same foot with a controlled landing. The subject had to maintain balance on landing until the test leader had registered the landing position, approximately (2-3 s). The distance was measured in centimeters from the toe at the push-off to the heel where the subject landed.

For the side hop test, the subject stood on the test leg, with the other leg lifted from the floor, and hands placed behind the back. Two parallel strips of tape, placed 40 cm apart on the floor was used and the subject jumped from side to side as many times as possible during a period of 30 s. The number of successful jumps performed, without touching the tape, was recorded and will be used for further analysis.

Sample size calculation Based on a power of 0.80 (α =0.05), approximately 18 CAI subjects would be required to detect a 20 % difference between injured and non-injured ankle in the balance test score. Twenty percent was considered as a minimal clinically relevant difference. Therefore, this study was planned to recruit a minimum of 25 CAI subjects with regard for potential dropouts.

Statistical analysis plan Statistics will be calculated using IBM SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. IBM, Armonk, NY). Differences in strength, balance and functional performance, between injured and non-injured ankle, will be analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank test. The Spearman's correlation coefficient will be used to analyze the association between the different tests.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) will be calculated to determine whether a side-to-side lower limb difference could be classified as normal or abnormal. The LSI is defined as the ratio of the score of the injured ankle and the score of the non-injured ankle, expressed in percent (injured/non-injured x 100 = LSI).

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Ankle Instability

Browse trials for

03

In context

Joint Instability

147 studies on the registry are indexed under Joint Instability; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 35 is below the median of 58 across 66 observational studies indexed under Joint Instability.

Browse Joint Instability studies →

Lead sponsor

Linnaeus University is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

A total of 27 CAI received an invitation to participate. Four subjects were excluded due to newly injured ankle, two due to bilateral ankle instability and one because of previous problems but not in the past year. Finally, 20 CAI subjects were included in the analysis (Table 1). The subjects were involved in floorball (n=8), running (n=5), football (n=5), equestrian sports (n=1) and gymnastics (n=1). In addition, a convenience sample of 15 healthy subjects were also recruited in order to establish the specificity and accuracy of the test battery.

Inclusion criteria

  • Unilateral ankle problems
  • Aged 15-40 years
  • Minimum three recurrent sprains in the past year

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous ankle fracture with internal fixation surgery
  • disease / illness that could have a general effect on the balance or strength
  • newly sprained/injured in the current ankle within a period of eight weeks before the test
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Subjects with chronic ankle instability

    Men and women with recurrent unilateral ankle instability problems

    Diagnostic Test: A test battery for evaluation of muscle strength, balance and functional performance

  • Control group

    Healthy men and women without ankle problems

    Diagnostic Test: A test battery for evaluation of muscle strength, balance and functional performance

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testA test battery for evaluation of muscle strength, balance and functional performance

    Subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI) were evaluated with five tests of strength, balance and functional performance.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Muscle strength measured in Newton

    Ankle inversion and eversion isometric muscle strength measured with a handheld dynometer and measured in Newton

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Balance

    Balance assessed by the Single-leg stance test (SLS) and measured in number of footlifts

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Functional performance assessed with the SLHD test measured in centimeters

    Functional performance assessed with the SLHD test measured in centimeters for the total distance. The athlete stands on one leg and then jump as far as possible and land on the same leg. The best of three attempts will be used for further analysis.

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Functional performance assessed with the side hop test and measured as the number of repetitions

    Functional performance assessed with the side hop test and measured as the number of repetitions. Two parallel strips of tape is placed 40 cm apart on the floor. The athlete stands on one leg, with the hands behind the back, and jumps from side to side between the two strips. The athlete jumps as many times as possible during a period of 30 s. The number of successful jumps performed, without touching the tape, is recorded.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sofia Ryman Augustsson
    Kalmar, 391 82, Sweden
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05732168
Lead sponsor
Linnaeus University
Responsible party
Sofia Ryman Ryman Augustsson (Associate Professor, Linnaeus University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 16, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 8, 2022
Completion
Dec 8, 2022
Last update
Mar 6, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion