ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05730582Updated Sep 2, 2026

Increasing Uptake of EHR-enabled Population Health Outreach Strategies to Improve Diabetes Screening

An interventional study of Parkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) Screening Invitation in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Pre Diabetes, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-02.

Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study team's central hypothesis is that the Parkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) screening invitations targeted by race/ethnicity with culturally concordant messaging and tailored by glycemic risk (known PDM vs. unknown glycemic state) plus phone-based navigation of non-responders will be more effective at closing screening gaps than PDDP generic screening invitations and usual care, opportunistic screening alone.

Read the detailed description

The research team will conduct a pragmatic, split cluster randomized controlled trial (clinic=cluster; patient randomization) in 12 community-based primary care clinics in an integrated safety net health system serving a high-risk, racially/ethnically diverse population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  • Pre Diabetes

Keywords

  • Diagnostic Screening Program
  • Health System Intervention
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

10,371 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,406 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500,000 is above the median of 80 across 8,350 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 1,010 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 105 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is alive at time of data extraction
  • Age >= 18 at time of data extraction and \<76
  • Visit with PCP at Parkland clinic in the last 18 months (548 days), where Encounter type = Virtual Visit or Encounter type = Office Visit
  • Patient NOT included in Parkland Diabetes Registry
  • Preferred language is Spanish or English
  • Ethnicity is Hispanic or Non-Hispanic
  • Race is White or Black
  • Patient is not pregnant in last 12 months

Exclusion Criteria for Study Population 1: Prediabetes Glycemic Risk Group

  • Last value \<5.7 (normal)
  • Last A1C value >6.4 (diabetes)
  • Last A1C value = blank (unchecked)
  • Last A1C date occurred within last 12 months from date of export

Exclusion Criteria for Study Population 2: Score-Based Glycemic Risk Group

  • Risk score \<9
  • Last A1C date occurred in last 30 months from date of export
  • Last A1C value was >5.7 (PDM/DM)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
500,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Generic Screening Invitation

    Patients randomized to this study arm will receive the generic letter to inform them that they are at risk for T2D and that they are not up to date on screening. The letter also informs them that a screening test has been ordered, and requests that they complete testing at their clinic lab. The letter is signed by the patient's primary care provider and sent in both English and Spanish. This letter was previously developed and has been in use by the Parkland Diabetes Detection Program.

    Behavioral: Parkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) Screening Invitation

  • Experimental
    Targeted-Tailored Screening Invitation

    Patients randomized to this study arm will receive the tailored letter, which uses messaging developed collaboratively by patients and clinical stakeholders under a prior NIH-funded research study (STU 2021-0743), in addition to available EHR data, to inform patients that they are at risk for Type 2 Diabetes based on specific clinical characteristics and that they are not up to date on screening. The letter also informs them that a screening test has been ordered, and requests that they fast and complete testing at their clinic lab within 60 days. Fasting instructions will specify nothing to eat or drink except water for at least 8 hours. The letter will be signed electronically by the patient's primary care provider and sent in both English and Spanish.

    Behavioral: Parkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) Screening Invitation

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care

    Patients randomized to this study arm will receive opportunistic screening based on routine clinical activities. Patients will be assigned a study number for tracking purposes, but no intervention activities via the Parkland Dysglycemia Detection Program will occur for this study arm.

Interventions

  • BehavioralParkland Diabetes Detection Program (PDDP) Screening Invitation

    The PDDP is designed to supplement and close screening gaps that persist despite opportunistic screening. Program staff order diabetes screening tests for randomized patients, then mail screening invitation letters to inform patients that they are at risk for diabetes. The letter informs them that a screening test has been ordered, and requests that they complete testing at their clinic lab. Patients who were mailed the letter but have not completed screening after 30 days are tracked and are send a second "reminder" invitation. Patients randomized to the targeted-tailored intervention study arm receive an additional phone call after 30 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Invitation efficacy

    Invitation efficacy will be assessed by comparing the proportion of patients completing HgA1c or Fasting Blood Glucose screening tests at Day 60 in the targeted-tailored invitation intervention compared to the generic invitation intervention.

    Time frame: 60 days

  2. Program effectiveness

    Program effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the proportion of patients completing HgA1c or Fasting Blood Glucose screening tests at Day 365 across intervention and control arms.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Direct costs

    Direct costs of diabetes screening compared across study arms

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Cost effectiveness as measured by costs per patient screened

    Cost effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the costs per patient screened across study arms

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Cost effectiveness as measured by cost per case found

    Cost effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the costs per case found across study arms

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 29 months after the start.

Of 2,066 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 29 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,243 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 11, 2023
First posted
Feb 16, 2023
StartActual
Mar 5, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2028
Last update
Sep 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05730582
Collaborators
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), Parkland Health and Hospital System
Responsible party
Michael Edward Bowen (Associate Professor of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 16, 2023
Start date
Mar 5, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2026

Study contacts

Michael Bowen, MD
principal investigator · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion