CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05727826Updated Feb 14, 2023

The Investigation of the Effectiveness of Vibratory Stimulation on Upper Limb Function, Pain and Sensation in Patients With Stroke.

An interventional study of Thrive MD-01 . in Stroke, sponsored by Yeditepe University. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-14.

Sponsored by Yeditepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2023), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objectives of this study cover both the vibration stimulation intervention and its outcomes. Patients with stroke frequently experience spasm in both the lower and upper extremities, which impairs sensory perception and motor function. This study aims to evaluate the effects of vibration therapy on the forearm and arm extensors of stroke patients and to report on changes in sensory perception and motor function measures. Although vibration therapy has lately been utilized to treat these limbs, there haven't been enough trials to determine how beneficial it is in the application procedure. This study aims to investigate the outcomes and effectiveness of a vibration therapy program administered to the extensor muscles.

Read the detailed description

One of the major disadvantages is the loss of muscle strength in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. Muscle weakness is caused after a stroke, followed by limited movement . Tactile and proprioceptive sensations are reduced in up to 65% of hemiplegic patients. Furthermore, pain, temperature, and touch are reduced. Because the ability to perceive these sensory features is impaired, recognizing objects by touch or exploring the environment can be difficult. Furthermore, it is stated that the senses are important and influence the recognition of skilled movements. A disorder has negative consequences for safety, natural hand use, the ability to maintain an appropriate level of strength while grasping without vision, and difficulties with object management. In this way, regaining motor control is a complex and time-consuming process. The increased unmasking of neural covert connections and the number of synapses in dendrites are two mechanisms by which the brain reorganizes itself. It has been observed that functionally relevant adaptive changes occur in the brain following an injury .Segmental muscle vibration (SMV) is a technique that uses a mechanical apparatus to deliver a vibratory stimulus to a specific tendon. As a result of the facilitation of muscle spindle primary ends, SMV provides Ia inputs. By managing intracortical inhibition and activating sensory inputs to the primary motor cortex, Ia sensory inputs facilitated by SMV can alter the activation of the corticospinal pathway. Transcranial magnetic simulation was used in a previous study after low-amplitude SMV was applied to the flexor carpi radialis muscle and inner hand muscles, and increased excitability in the primary motor cortex .While systematic data on improving human somatosensation are lacking, many accounts indicate that there is room for improvement. Furthermore, previous research on lesioned primates has shown that extensive training in touch, proprioception, and vibration improves even the most complex discriminating abilities. It also aided in the identification of the somatosensory cortex. As a result, the purpose of this study was to better understand the pure effect of repeated vibratory stimulation and its long-term effects two weeks after the last intervention session, when compared to the experimental or control groups.

In summary, studies in the literature have used a vibratory stimulation device to perform arm and wrist flexor motion therapy. This will be the first study to look at how vibratory stimulation of the forearm and arm extensor muscles affects upper extremity function, sensation, and pain parameters in hemiplegic patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Yeditepe University is the lead sponsor of 127 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • no complaints of pain caused by induced vibration
  • >24 points in Mini Mental State Examination
  • Having a diagnosis of hemiplegia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Other neurological problems, Parkinson's
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    stroke patients

    individuals with hemiplegia after Hemorrhagic or Infarction stroke

    Device: Thrive MD-01 .

Interventions

  • DeviceThrive MD-01 .

    The experimental group received a 60 Hz vibration stimulation treatment using the SMV method three times per week for two weeks (EG).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Box and block test (BBT)

    Box and block test (BBT) which is used to assess unilateral gross manual dexterity and functional abilities of upper extremity specifically for hand and wrist functionality. A simple, quick, and inexpensive test, it takes only a few minutes to complete. In the BBT, a wooden box is divided into two compartments by a partition, and 150 blocks are placed inside. During BBT administration, the patient is position at the table and asked to move as many blocks as possible in 60 seconds between two individual compartments which are equal in size. A client's score is determined by the number of blocks transferred between compartments within 60 seconds. The scores for each hand should be kept separately. Better manual dexterity is reflected in higher scores. When the BBT is being conducted, the evaluator should be aware of whether the client's fingertips cross the partition. In order to count blocks, this condition must be met.

    Time frame: 60 seconds

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is used to measure the severity of pain in patients, it can also be useful at recording patients' pain progression, or compare pain severity between individuals with similar conditions.

    Time frame: 2 minutes

Other outcomes

  1. monofilament test

    In the evaluation of light touch and pressure protective senses, monofilament is used to test sensory levels and detect diminishing and returning senses. This evaluation should be carried out in a very systematic manner. The therapist begins with the smallest monofilament and progresses to the largest filament in the correct order, but the test is stopped and the value is recorded when the patient detects the smallest monofilament being tested. It is applied to the anterior and posterior surfaces of the fingers from the first to the fifth, distal to proximal. This evaluation tool is made up of a series of monofilaments that vary in thickness and diameter. These monofilaments have gradient strengths ranging from 0.086 gm to 448 gm. These monofilaments are used to assess sensory impairment.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Yeditepe university
    Istanbul, Ataşahir 34755, Turkey
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05727826
Lead sponsor
Yeditepe University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2023
Start date
Mar 2, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 26, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
May 26, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 14, 2023

Study contacts

Hager E Yahya, Mcs
Contact
hageryahya13@gmail.com
5527913211

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion