CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05721547Updated Feb 10, 2023

Alterations in Spinal Alignment and Mobility in Individuals With Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

An observational study in Rotator Cuff Tears, Posture and Spinal Curvatures, sponsored by Abant Izzet Baysal University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-10.

Sponsored by Abant Izzet Baysal University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
50
Ages
40 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this observational study was to the alterations in spinal alignment in individuals who have undergone RC surgery and revealed the differences compared to healthy individuals.

Read the detailed description

Shoulder dysfunctions are thought to be predisposed by poor posture and muscle imbalances. The shoulder functionality could be limited or worsened by a restricted range of motion (ROM) of the spine. Evidence from studies evaluating both people with shoulder pain and asymptomatic participants indicates a relationship between a decreased thoracic kyphosis and an increased shoulder ROM. Therefore, a higher thoracic kyphosis may be linked to a lower ROM in the shoulder. Shoulder dysfunction becomes more common after the age of 40, and the relationship between spinal posture and shoulder dysfunction is crucially needed to be assessed.

The aim of this observational study was to the alterations in spinal alignment and mobility in individuals who have undergone RC surgery and revealed the differences compared to healthy individuals.

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted with patients who underwent arthroscopic RM surgery and healthy volunteers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Tears
  • Posture
  • Spinal Curvatures
  • Arthroscopic Surgery
03

In context

Spinal Curvatures

26 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Curvatures; 1 is open to participants now.

Browse Spinal Curvatures studies →

Lead sponsor

Abant Izzet Baysal University is the lead sponsor of 242 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who underwent arthroscopic RM surgery who had undergone the same arthroscopic RM surgical procedure and technique

Inclusion criteria

  • those who had undergone the same arthroscopic RM surgical procedure and technique
  • had undergone acromioplasty and/or tenodesis with RM repair
  • had undergone arthroscopic RM surgery from the upper extremity of the dominant side;
  • had completed six months following surgery; were able to perform active shoulder elevation movements of 90° or more
  • were between the ages of 40 and 75
  • were volunteers to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • who had undergone previous shoulder surgery or revision surgery, subscapularis tendon repair in addition to RM repair, scoliosis surgery, or any surgeries to limit spine motion, as well as those with a history of upper extremity fractures, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or chronic respiratory diseases that could limit the test's ability to be accomplished
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
8 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • RC Repair Group

    Participants who had undergone the same arthroscopic RM surgical procedure and technique; had undergone acromioplasty and/or tenodesis with RM repair; had undergone arthroscopic RM surgery from the upper extremity of the dominant side; had completed six months following surgery

    Other: Assessment

  • Healthy Group

    Participants who had not undergone any shoulder surgery, had no history of shoulder-related pain, discomfort, or trauma in the last year

    Other: Assessment

Interventions

  • OtherAssessment

    Assessment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Spinal alignment and mobility assessment

    The Spinal Mouse (IDIAG M360), novel, a computer-aided electronic measuring tool that noninvasively evaluates spinal range of motion and intersegmental angles, was used to examine spinal posture. The Spinal Mouse device is reliable and valid for the assessment of spine mobility and posture

    Time frame: 8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Scapular dyskinesia

    Performed using the observational scapular dyskinesia test

    Time frame: 8 months

  2. Range of Motion

    Performed using with Goniometer

    Time frame: 8 months

  3. Postural stability

    Performed using with functional reach test

    Time frame: 8 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University
    Bolu, Central 14000, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05721547
Lead sponsor
Abant Izzet Baysal University
Responsible party
Beyza Yazgan Dagli (Research Assistant, Abant Izzet Baysal University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2023
Start date
Jun 20, 2018
Primary completion
May 25, 2019
Completion
Jan 15, 2020
Last update
Feb 10, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion