An interventional study of Ronco-Onco and MAD in Oral Cancer, Pharynx Cancer and Sleep Apnea, sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM). Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-15.
Sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Evaluation of the Tolerance and Benefits of Mandibular Advanced Device (MAD) for Snoring and Sleep Apnea in Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC): Mixed Design Study.
The department of stomatology of the CHUM (Centre Hospitalier Université de Montreal) mandate is to ensure oral management of patients with oropharyngeal cancers (OPC), including papillomavirus (HPV), treated with radiotherapy (RTH), surgery and chemotherapy. At CHUM clinic, several patients who have had RTH treatments (with or without surgery or/and chemotherapy) complain of snoring and respiratory arrest during sleep. HPV-associated OPC, squamous cell carcinoma, has had a net increasing incidence for more than 20 years in North America (4.6/100,000) and male mortality has increased by 3.1% per year since 2001. In Quebec, the incidence is almost 26 cases per million. Worldwide, it is ranked to be the 13 most common cancer in male aged 25-39 years; the male/female ratio is 2.5 (female have more HPV cervix related cancer) - Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030- (Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022).
Snoring occurs in nearly 40% of the general population, increases with age and can be one of the telltale signs of sleep apnea (brief and repetitive breathing stops at risk of mortality if left untreated). Snoring can be associated with poor sleep quality and produces a loud disturbing noise for the sleeping partner. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is reported by 2-4% of the general population and by almost 30% of the elderly mainly related to obesity and heart disorders. The risk factors associated with these conditions are lost of airway muscle tone during sleep, retrognathia, deep/narrow palate, obesity and age. Fatigue and drowsiness are markers of OSA. Following RTH, there may be oropharyngeal tissue fibrosis that may contribute to snoring and sleep apnea.
Sleep disordered breathing are known in individuals with OPC. Our first results of the ongoing survey seem to indicate that severe snoring, causing drowsiness or fatigue, would be present in 47% of patients with OPC. A recently published literature review, from our team, also found a snoring self-reports prevalence from 33% to 82%. A polygraphic sleep recording study found that 65% of individuals with head and neck cancer (including OPC) have snoring, a value that increases to 92% when OSA is concomitant. On the other hand, OSA seem to be present in over 70% of OPC patients, before and after treatment. However, causality remains to be demonstrated; these sleep disorders are often pre-existing and can worsen as a result of RTH.
In adults, snoring is mainly controlled by devices correcting the dorsal position of sleep as well as with mandibular advanced device (MAD). Regarding apnea, positive pressure vessels (PPC or CPAP) are the most effective. The MAD is indicated for mild to moderate OSA or for low CPAP tolerance. To date, following RTH, there are no studies conducted under strict conditions. Some 'suggestions' in favour of standard treatments, PPC or MAD, were made. In addition, no studies have estimated the nasal discomfort and dryness associated with these treatments in the OPC population. Intuitively, nylon MAD, thin and with little contact on the mucous membranes, could be indicated in the presence of OPC. To date, only one study, based on 2 cases, suggests the use of MAD in the presence of OPC. There is therefore a gap of evidences in the literature as to whether patients treated for OPC presenting snoring and OSA would be able to tolerate and benefit from MAD.
Objectives: Conduct a pilot study, with a mixed quantitative and qualitative design, to reduce snoring or sleep apnea using an MAD, and improve the quality of life and sleep.
Hypotheses: Individuals who have received RTH as part of a treatment for OPC and who have snoring or OSA, can 1) tolerate and 2) benefit from treatment with MAD.
Experimental method and approach.
446 studies on the registry are indexed under Mouth Neoplasms; 130 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 35 is below the median of 60 across 313 interventional studies indexed under Mouth Neoplasms.
Browse Mouth Neoplasms studies →Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) is the lead sponsor of 376 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
MAD = mandibular advancement appliance, in 60-70% forward position from maximum possible jaw advancement for a given participant
Device: Ronco-Onco and MAD
Mandibular advancement appliance in neurtral-control position, 10-20% of advancement - a non functional position to open upper airway
Device: Ronco-Onco and MAD
Comparison of active over a neutral mandibular advacement oral appliance to assess tolerance and efficacy in oropharyngeal cancer individuals in managing snoring and sleep apnea following radiotherapy of oropharynx.
Index apnea-hypopnea
respiratory cessation index (number of event per hour of sleep, 1 to max of 100, rare value)
Time frame: From sleep onset to wake time (6-8 hrs) in morning of night 1 for baseline vs difference of 2 or 3 according to ramdom allocation
Snoring
Total snoring time (minute per sleep duration of a given participant, average as mean or median) and event frequency (number of event per hour of sleep) - values expected from 0 to 100 for each outcome
Time frame: From sleep onset to wake time (6-8 hrs) in morning of night 1 for baseline vs difference of 2 or 3 according to ramdom allocation
Sleep quality
Duration (estimated by participant in number of hour) and self perception of quality (0-10 visual analog scale)
Time frame: Done in morning from 6-8 sleep period, assessed in morning of each of 3 nights
Plan to share: Yes — To follow our institutional guidelines
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code
Time frame: 12 months after study completion
Access criteria: To be updated according to our institution policies - these are regularly revised
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) →