CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05714631Updated Jul 8, 2026Results posted

Lidocaine Patches in Elderly Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures

A Phase 4 interventional study of Placebo Patch and 4% Lidocaine Patch in Rib Fractures, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-08.

Sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Poor Enrollment
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Many patients are prescribed lidocaine patches for rib fractures despite mixed evidence to their efficacy. The outcome of this trial offers significant benefit to patient care if it finds benefit of their use or if it does not. Reducing opioid use and increasing functional outcomes in geriatric patient suffering rib fractures can improve quality of life and ability to return to prior levels of function. Limiting the need for opioid prescriptions dispensed in the community, particularly to vulnerable geriatric individuals, is also a key aspect in curbing the opioid epidemic. However, even if no difference is found, it would support stopping the use of lidocaine patches in this population as a waste of money and resources. The novel approach of adding the 3rd arm to assess for placebo effect will also carry clinical value, as a placebo effect that reduces opioid use may in fact be enough to support continued use of the products given their overall low side effect risk profile compared to opioids and other pain control medications.

Read the detailed description

Many patients are prescribed lidocaine patches for rib fractures despite mixed evidence to their efficacy. The outcome of this trial offers significant benefit to patient care if it finds benefit of their use or if it does not. Reducing opioid use and increasing functional outcomes in geriatric patient suffering rib fractures can improve quality of life and ability to return to prior levels of function. Limiting the need for opioid prescriptions dispensed in the community, particularly to vulnerable geriatric individuals, is also a key aspect in curbing the opioid epidemic. However, even if no difference is found, it would support stopping the use of lidocaine patches in this population as a waste of money and resources. The novel approach of adding the 3rd arm to assess for placebo effect will also carry clinical value, as a placebo effect that reduces opioid use may in fact be enough to support continued use of the products given their overall low side effect risk profile compared to opioids and other pain control medications

AIM 1: Determine if a 3-armed placebo controlled randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of 4% lidocaine patches is feasible on a large scale with up to 500 enrolled patients across multiple institutions.

Objective 1: Evaluate the study design, randomization system, drug delivery and placebo creation processes to determine barriers to a larger multicenter study design.

AIM 2: Determine if the use of 4% lidocaine patches decreases the utilization of opioids in geriatric (Age ≥65) patient with rib fractures and minimal other injuries by 50% or more during the first 72 hours of hospitalization.

Objective 2: Determine an appropriate target opioid reduction rate and appropriate enrollment numbers for a future a larger scale trial. We suspect a 50% opioid reduction may be larger than would be expected for a single aspect of multimodal pain control treatment. While the study will be powered to identify this difference, it is more likely that a 20-40% reduction could be achieved and therefore help determine appropriate power calculations for a future trial.

AIM 3: Determine if there is a potential placebo effect of topical patch therapy.

Objective 3: Utilizing a 3rd arm increases the number of patients needed to enroll but will help clarify if there is a significant placebo effect from the application of a non-medicated patch over rib fractures. There may be clinical benefit from this placebo effect itself which would need to be accounted for clinical recommendations generated from this and future studies.

AIM 4: Include post discharge opioid usage in analysis to determine the prolonged pain needs of patients suffering rib fractures.

Objective 4: Assess the feasibility of incorporating opioid prescription data using the Wisconsin Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (WI PDMP)as part of a clinical trial as a measure of post discharge opioid use.

Approved study staff will be screening the trauma surgery patients list. Elderly patients (>/=65) with traumatic rib fractures will be approached within 24 hours after admission. Approved study staff will explain the project and informed consent in its entirety. Patients will then be randomized to one of 3 arms: 4% Lidocaine Patches, Placebo, Standard of Care (no lidocaine patch). Randomization will take place using RedCap database. The patients will receive the study drug or placebo as recommended by the manufacturer as 12 hours on, 12 hours off regimen. The patch location will be selected by the patient and nurse based on site of maximal pain. The patient will receive 1 drug or placebo patch for 1-3 rib fractures, 2 patches if 4-6 rib fractures, and 3 patches (maximum dose) if \& or more fractures. The 4% Lidocaine patches will be obtained from the Froedtert Investigational Drug Office and dispensed with enough supply to last for 3 patch cycles in 5 days. The patches will then have kinesio tape (designed for topical application) applied over the patch to blind the patients to whether it is a study drug or placebo. For placebo, a double thickness similarly shaped piece of kinesio tape will be used. Based on drug efficacy, all patches can be prepared at the time of study enrollment and remain viable for use during the duration of the study. Patients in the standard of care arm will not receive a patch. All other pain medications will be prescribed at the discretion of treating providers based on standard of care (see section 52.1 Pain Management Protocol Lidocaine RCT). Approved study staff will be accessing patient's electronic medical record 5 days after enrollment; approved study staff will gather information regarding pain score (scored out of 10) and oral morphine equivalent (OME). Dr. Jacob Peschman is the director of outpatient services; he will be accessing patient's 30-day post discharge opioid use utilizing the Wisconsin Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP). Patients will be approached by approved study staff 30-days post discharge. Patients will be asked several questions regarding pain score and control.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rib Fractures

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rib Fractures

131 studies on the registry are indexed under Rib Fractures; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 60 across 99 interventional studies indexed under Rib Fractures.

Browse Rib Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical College of Wisconsin is the lead sponsor of 540 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Of its 71 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • age>/= 65 years
  • Patients with injuries meeting an AIS score \</=2
  • Patients admitted to trauma service
  • Patients able to consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<65 years
  • Unable to consent
  • Chronic pain medication usage; defined as >/= 3 weeks of >/= 30 mg oral morphine equivalent
  • History of allergic reaction to lidocaine or adhesive tape
  • Prisoners
  • Patient will be excluded if pain is worse in non-ribs location
  • Patient will be excluded if he has injuries not meeting our criteria
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of care group

    Patients in the standard of care will not be receiving any lidocaine or placebo patches. The aim of this group is to control for the placebo effect

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    Other: Placebo Patch

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Drug: 4% Lidocaine Patch

Interventions

  • OtherPlacebo Patch

    Transdermal placebo patch

  • Drug4% Lidocaine Patch

    Transdermal patch

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oral Morphine Equivalent

    Oral Morphine Equivalents Calculated based on opioids used between enrollment in the study until the time of discharge

    Time frame: From date of enrollment until the date of discharge, assessed up to 1 week in a typical hospital stay

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Scores

    Patient will report numerical pain score (0 (no pain) -10 (worst pain imaginable)) as part of standard nursing assessments. A median pain score will be calculated from all the values collected on each hospital day. Median scores will be reported for each day from the date of enrollment until the date of discharge.

    Time frame: Daily median score from post enrollment until discharge

  2. Post Discharge Opioid Prescription

    Total oral morphine equivalents in mg of opioids prescribed to each patient from the time of discharge until 30 days post discharge

    Time frame: Total from Hospital discharge until 30 days post discharge

07

Results

Posted Jul 8, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Very poor enrollment due to inclusion/exclusion criteria

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard of Care GroupPlacebo GroupIntervention Group
Started221
Completed221
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryOral Morphine Equivalent

Oral Morphine Equivalents Calculated based on opioids used between enrollment in the study until the time of discharge

Time frame:
From date of enrollment until the date of discharge, assessed up to 1 week in a typical hospital stay
Reported as:
Mean · mg
Oral Morphine Equivalent
mgStandard of Care GroupPlacebo GroupIntervention Group
Oral Morphine Equivalent138.5 (47 to 230)43 (11 to 75)11 (11 to 11)
SecondaryPain Scores

Patient will report numerical pain score (0 (no pain) -10 (worst pain imaginable)) as part of standard nursing assessments. A median pain score will be calculated from all the values collected on each hospital day. Median scores will be reported for each day from the date of enrollment until the date of discharge.

Time frame:
Daily median score from post enrollment until discharge
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Pain Scores
units on a scaleStandard of Care GroupPlacebo GroupIntervention Group
Pain Scores5.5 (4 to 7)2.5 (0 to 5)4 (4 to 4)
SecondaryPost Discharge Opioid Prescription

Total oral morphine equivalents in mg of opioids prescribed to each patient from the time of discharge until 30 days post discharge

Time frame:
Total from Hospital discharge until 30 days post discharge
Reported as:
Mean · mg
Post Discharge Opioid Prescription
mgStandard of Care GroupPlacebo GroupIntervention Group
Post Discharge Opioid Prescription37.5 (30 to 45)22.5 (0 to 45)15 (15 to 15)

Adverse events

Collected over enrollment until 30 days post discharge. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard of Care Group0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)
Placebo Group0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)
Intervention Group0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Closed study due to enrollment

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard of Care GroupPlacebo GroupIntervention GroupTotal
Mean70 (68 to 72)67.5 (67 to 68)80 (80 to 80)70.8 (67 to 80)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard of Care GroupPlacebo GroupIntervention GroupTotal
Female0000
Male2215
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard of Care GroupPlacebo GroupIntervention GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0000
White2215
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Abdul Hafiz Al Tannir
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53213, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 10, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05714631
Lead sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Responsible party
Jacob Peschman, MD (Assistant professor of surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 6, 2023
Start date
Oct 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2024
Completion
Aug 1, 2024
Results posted
Jul 8, 2026
Last update
Jul 8, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion