CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05711524Updated Nov 21, 2025Results posted

Transfusion of Pathogen Reduced Cryoprecipitated Fibrinogen to Expedite Product Availability in Perioperative Bleeding

A Phase 4 interventional study of Traditional Cryoprecipitate and Pathogen-Reduced Cryoprecipitate in Hypofibrinogenemia and Bleeding, sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-21.

Sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
208
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this quality improvement study is to compare pathogen-reduced cryoprecipitate with traditional cryoprecipitate in liver transplant and cardiovascular patients. The investigators hypothesize that by having immediate access to a readily available thawed blood product that replaces fibrinogen (the main substrate of a blood clot), early bleeding can be treated before it escalates into uncontrolled hemorrhage, and therefore additional blood products, like platelets, plasma and red blood cells can be avoided.

Participants will be given one of the two FDA-approved blood products.

Read the detailed description

Immediately replacing fibrinogen in perioperative bleeding patients with acquired fibrinogen deficiency improves outcomes. The product that is primarily used for fibrinogen replacement in the US, cryoprecipitate (cryo), must be stored frozen and expires six hours after thawing, resulting in a delay in transfusion of approximately 50 minutes from the time it is ordered, as well as unnecessary transfusion of more readily available but not indicated blood components that are transfused while the patients waits for cryo . A modified version of the product, pathogen reduced (PR) cryo, is now FDA approved and can be thawed and stored for 5 days, allowing the product to be available immediately when needed. In this quality improvement study, the investigators will compare the effect that readily available, pre-thawed PR cryo has on transfusion practice in cardiovascular and liver transplant patients who receive PR cryo versus those who receive traditional cryo by randomizing cryo transfusions in the blood bank by month to all cryo or all PR cryo. All clinical decisions, including the need for cryo, and laboratory testing will occur per standard of care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypofibrinogenemia
  • Bleeding

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cryoprecipitate
  • Pathogen Reduced Cryoprecipitate
03

In context

Hemorrhage

3,000 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhage; 474 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 208 is above the median of 100 across 1,985 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhage.

Browse Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University is the lead sponsor of 867 studies on the registry; 160 are open to participants now.

Of its 119 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery or liver transplant who receive cryo during surgery during the two year study period.
  2. Cardiovascular surgery includes the following procedures:

    1. coronary artery bypass grafting
    2. valve repair or replacement
    3. open thoracic aortic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery
    4. atrial or ventricular septal defects
    5. ventricular assist device implantation or revision
    6. or any combination of the above.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who do not receive any cryo product in the OR
  2. Patients who are not cardiovascular surgery or liver transplant patients
  3. Cardiac transplantation surgery
  4. Patients who receive a product in error within either the cryo time period or the PR cryo time period. For example, PR cryo during a cryo month or cryo during a PR cryo time month.
  5. Patients who receive less than 1 pool (5 units) of cryo
  6. Pediatric patients (less than 18 years of age).
  7. Patients who received both PR cryo and traditional cryo
  8. Pregnant women
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
208 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Patients given Traditional Cryo

    These are the liver transplant and cardiothoracic (LT and CT) patients that will be given traditional cryo based on the randomization protocol. The blood bank will alternate use of PR cryo and regular cryo each month for all patients with a cryo order. All patients will receive either traditional cryo or PR cryo in a given month.

    Biological: Traditional Cryoprecipitate

  • Experimental
    Patients given PR Cryo

    These are the liver transplant and cardiothoracic (LT and CT) patients that will be given PR cryo based on the randomization protocol. The blood bank will alternate use of PR cryo and regular cryo each month for all patients with a cryo order. All patients will receive either traditional cryo or PR cryo in a given month.

    Biological: Pathogen-Reduced Cryoprecipitate

Interventions

  • BiologicalTraditional Cryoprecipitate

    This is the cryoprecipitate already currently being given to patients with a cryo order.

  • BiologicalPathogen-Reduced Cryoprecipitate

    This is the pathogen-reduced cryoprecipitate that is intended to be compared to the standard cryoprecipitate.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Number of RBCs Used Over Admission

    RBCs used over admission

    Time frame: Within the first 30 days after surgery.

  2. Total Number of Platelets Used Over Admission

    Plts used over admission

    Time frame: Within the first 30 days after surgery.

  3. Total Number of Plasma Used Over Admission

    All units over admission

    Time frame: Within the first 30 days after surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Cryo Units Used Perioperatively

    All products within 3 days

    Time frame: 3 days post procedure

  2. Number of RBCs Used Perioperatively

    Number of RBC units transfused during perioperative period

    Time frame: 3 days post procedure

  3. Number of Plasma Used Perioperatively

    Time frame: 3 days post procedure

  4. Number of Platelets Used Perioperatively

    Number of platelet units transfused during perioperative period

    Time frame: 3 days post procedure

  5. Time From Operating Room (OR) Start Time to Start of Cryo Transfusion

    Time frame: procedure (Time from OR start time to start of cryo transfusion)

  6. Time From Cryo Order to Start of Transfusion

    Time to cryo order time to start of cryo transfusion

    Time frame: procedure (Time from cryo order to start of transfusion)

  7. Number of Cryo Units Wasted by Blood Bank

    This captures the Cryoprecipitate units discarded.

    Time frame: Daily, up to approximately 24 months

  8. Pre Transfusion FIBTEM Amplitude 10 Min After Start of Clot Formation

    FIBTEM before transfusion, if anesthesiologist orders it. FIBTEM is a point of care laboratory test measuring fibrinogen contribution to a clot. It is part of ROTEM testing and helps providers determine if patients need fibrinogen supplementation during surgical bleeding.

    Time frame: Variable, but it is generally available within 15 minutes of the start of ROTEM testing.

  9. Post Transfusion FIBTEM Amplitude at 10 Min After Start of Clot Formation

    FIBTEM after transfusion, if anesthesiologist orders it. FIBTEM is a point of care laboratory test measuring fibrinogen contribution to a clot. It is part of ROTEM testing and helps providers determine if patients need fibrinogen supplementation during surgical bleeding.

    Time frame: Variable, but it is generally available within 15 minutes of the start of ROTEM testing.

  10. Maximum Clot Firmness (MCF)

    The maximum strength of a clot as determined by ROTEM testing.

    Time frame: Variable, but it is generally available within 1 hour of the start of ROTEM testing.

  11. Pre-transfusion Fibrinogen Level

    The fibrinogen measurement before cryoprecipitate is transfused.

    Time frame: During surgery, within 3 hours of specimen receipt by laboratory.

  12. Highest Fibrinogen Level Within 24 Hours

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

  13. Lowest Fibrinogen Level Within 24 Hours

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

  14. Cumulative Volume in Drains After Surgery (e.g., Chest Tube for CV Surgery) at the Time of Removal

    The cumulative volume in drains after surgery (e.g., chest tube for CV surgery) at the time of drain removal

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 days

  15. Volume in Drains (Chest Tube for CV Surgery)

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

  16. Time From End of Bypass Pump for CV Surgery

    Time frame: Until end of surgery

  17. Length of Stay in OR

    Operating room length of stay

    Time frame: Duration of time in operating room

  18. Length of Stay in ICU

    Participant length of stay in ICU setting

    Time frame: During hospitalization, approximately 5 days to 30 days

  19. Length of Stay in Hospital

    Overall length of stay in hospital

    Time frame: During hospitalization, approximately 5 days to 30 days

  20. Need for Ventilator

    Time frame: During hospitalization, approximately 5 days to 30 days

  21. Time on Ventilator

    If participant was on ventilator, amount of time spent on ventilator

    Time frame: During hospitalization, approximately 5 days to 30 days

  22. Overall Cost of Cryo vs PR Cryo, When Factoring Wastage

    Cost of traditional cryoprecipitate compared to PR Cryoprecipitate.

    Time frame: Daily, approximately 24 months

  23. Number of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Fever

    All participants that experience fevers that occur during the time frame

    Time frame: Within 5 days of surgery start time

  24. Number of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Infection

    All participants that experience infections that occur during the time frame

    Time frame: Within 5 days of surgery start time

  25. Number of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Transfusion Reaction.

    All participants that experience transfusion reactions that occur during the time frame

    Time frame: Within 5 days of surgery start time

  26. Fibrinogen Level

    Fibrinogen level most proximal to the end of surgery

    Time frame: Most proximal to end of procedure

07

Results

Posted Nov 21, 2025

Participant flow

Month 1 (Traditional Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 1 (Traditional Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started200
Completed200
Not completed00
Month 2 (PR Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 2 (PR Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started020
Completed020
Not completed00
Month 3 (PR Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 3 (PR Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started017
Completed017
Not completed00
Month 4 (Traditional Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 4 (Traditional Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started200
Completed200
Not completed00
Month 5 (Traditional Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 5 (Traditional Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started200
Completed200
Not completed00
Month 6 (PR Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 6 (PR Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started019
Completed019
Not completed00
Month 7 (Traditional Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 7 (Traditional Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started230
Completed230
Not completed00
Month 8 (PR Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 8 (PR Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started015
Completed015
Not completed00
Month 9 (PR Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 9 (PR Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started019
Completed019
Not completed00
Month 10 (Traditional Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 10 (Traditional Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started100
Completed100
Not completed00
Month 11 (PR Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 11 (PR Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started013
Completed013
Not completed00
Month 12 (Traditional Cryo)
Participant flow — Month 12 (Traditional Cryo)
MilestonePatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Started120
Completed120
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Number of RBCs Used Over Admission

RBCs used over admission

Time frame:
Within the first 30 days after surgery.
Reported as:
Mean · RBC Units
Total Number of RBCs Used Over Admission
RBC UnitsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Total Number of RBCs Used Over Admission5.8 ± 6.56.7 ± 7.2
PrimaryTotal Number of Platelets Used Over Admission

Plts used over admission

Time frame:
Within the first 30 days after surgery.
Reported as:
Mean · platelet units
Total Number of Platelets Used Over Admission
platelet unitsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Total Number of Platelets Used Over Admission2.1 ± 3.12.1 ± 2.0
PrimaryTotal Number of Plasma Used Over Admission

All units over admission

Time frame:
Within the first 30 days after surgery.
Reported as:
Mean · plasma units
Total Number of Plasma Used Over Admission
plasma unitsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Total Number of Plasma Used Over Admission2.7 ± 4.63.4 ± 6.0
SecondaryNumber of Cryo Units Used Perioperatively

All products within 3 days

Time frame:
3 days post procedure
Reported as:
Mean · cryo units
Number of Cryo Units Used Perioperatively
cryo unitsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Number of Cryo Units Used Perioperatively2.3 ± 1.72.3 ± 1.6
SecondaryNumber of RBCs Used Perioperatively

Number of RBC units transfused during perioperative period

Time frame:
3 days post procedure
Reported as:
Mean · RBC units
Number of RBCs Used Perioperatively
RBC unitsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Number of RBCs Used Perioperatively4.6 ± 5.65.9 ± 6.6
SecondaryNumber of Plasma Used Perioperatively
Time frame:
3 days post procedure
Reported as:
Mean · plasma units
Number of Plasma Used Perioperatively
plasma unitsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Number of Plasma Used Perioperatively2.6 ± 4.63.4 ± 6.01
SecondaryNumber of Platelets Used Perioperatively

Number of platelet units transfused during perioperative period

Time frame:
3 days post procedure
Reported as:
Mean · platelet units
Number of Platelets Used Perioperatively
platelet unitsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Number of Platelets Used Perioperatively1.8 ± 1.72.0 ± 1.8
SecondaryTime From Operating Room (OR) Start Time to Start of Cryo Transfusion
Time frame:
procedure (Time from OR start time to start of cryo transfusion)
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Time From Operating Room (OR) Start Time to Start of Cryo Transfusion
minutesPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Time From Operating Room (OR) Start Time to Start of Cryo Transfusion366 (309 to 425)367 (324 to 416)
SecondaryTime From Cryo Order to Start of Transfusion

Time to cryo order time to start of cryo transfusion

Time frame:
procedure (Time from cryo order to start of transfusion)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time From Cryo Order to Start of Transfusion
minutesPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Time From Cryo Order to Start of Transfusion128.3 ± 200.788.5 ± 99.8
SecondaryNumber of Cryo Units Wasted by Blood Bank

This captures the Cryoprecipitate units discarded.

Time frame:
Daily, up to approximately 24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPre Transfusion FIBTEM Amplitude 10 Min After Start of Clot Formation

FIBTEM before transfusion, if anesthesiologist orders it. FIBTEM is a point of care laboratory test measuring fibrinogen contribution to a clot. It is part of ROTEM testing and helps providers determine if patients need fibrinogen supplementation during surgical bleeding.

Time frame:
Variable, but it is generally available within 15 minutes of the start of ROTEM testing.
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Pre Transfusion FIBTEM Amplitude 10 Min After Start of Clot Formation
mmPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Pre Transfusion FIBTEM Amplitude 10 Min After Start of Clot Formation9.6 ± 6.88.3 ± 4.2
SecondaryPost Transfusion FIBTEM Amplitude at 10 Min After Start of Clot Formation

FIBTEM after transfusion, if anesthesiologist orders it. FIBTEM is a point of care laboratory test measuring fibrinogen contribution to a clot. It is part of ROTEM testing and helps providers determine if patients need fibrinogen supplementation during surgical bleeding.

Time frame:
Variable, but it is generally available within 15 minutes of the start of ROTEM testing.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMaximum Clot Firmness (MCF)

The maximum strength of a clot as determined by ROTEM testing.

Time frame:
Variable, but it is generally available within 1 hour of the start of ROTEM testing.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPre-transfusion Fibrinogen Level

The fibrinogen measurement before cryoprecipitate is transfused.

Time frame:
During surgery, within 3 hours of specimen receipt by laboratory.
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Pre-transfusion Fibrinogen Level
mg/dLPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Pre-transfusion Fibrinogen Level145 ± 68191 ± 33
SecondaryHighest Fibrinogen Level Within 24 Hours
Time frame:
Within 24 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Highest Fibrinogen Level Within 24 Hours
mg/dLPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Highest Fibrinogen Level Within 24 Hours210 ± 53212 ± 46
SecondaryLowest Fibrinogen Level Within 24 Hours
Time frame:
Within 24 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Lowest Fibrinogen Level Within 24 Hours
mg/dLPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Lowest Fibrinogen Level Within 24 Hours194.5 ± 51.0199.89 ± 44.3
SecondaryCumulative Volume in Drains After Surgery (e.g., Chest Tube for CV Surgery) at the Time of Removal

The cumulative volume in drains after surgery (e.g., chest tube for CV surgery) at the time of drain removal

Time frame:
Up to approximately 3 days

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryVolume in Drains (Chest Tube for CV Surgery)
Time frame:
At 24 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · mLs
Volume in Drains (Chest Tube for CV Surgery)
mLsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Volume in Drains (Chest Tube for CV Surgery)897 ± 810749 ± 496
SecondaryTime From End of Bypass Pump for CV Surgery
Time frame:
Until end of surgery
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time From End of Bypass Pump for CV Surgery
hoursPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Time From End of Bypass Pump for CV Surgery2.75 (2.32 to 3.27)2.73 (2.46 to 3.22)
SecondaryLength of Stay in OR

Operating room length of stay

Time frame:
Duration of time in operating room
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Length of Stay in OR
minutesPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Length of Stay in OR522 ± 124534 ± 118
SecondaryLength of Stay in ICU

Participant length of stay in ICU setting

Time frame:
During hospitalization, approximately 5 days to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Stay in ICU
daysPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Length of Stay in ICU8.1 ± 11.86.9 ± 8.6
SecondaryLength of Stay in Hospital

Overall length of stay in hospital

Time frame:
During hospitalization, approximately 5 days to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Stay in Hospital
daysPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Length of Stay in Hospital12.0 ± 9.410.9 ± 10.1
SecondaryNeed for Ventilator
Time frame:
During hospitalization, approximately 5 days to 30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Need for Ventilator
ParticipantsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Need for Ventilator9996
SecondaryTime on Ventilator

If participant was on ventilator, amount of time spent on ventilator

Time frame:
During hospitalization, approximately 5 days to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time on Ventilator
daysPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Time on Ventilator2.4 ± 4.92.6 ± 6.3
SecondaryOverall Cost of Cryo vs PR Cryo, When Factoring Wastage

Cost of traditional cryoprecipitate compared to PR Cryoprecipitate.

Time frame:
Daily, approximately 24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Fever

All participants that experience fevers that occur during the time frame

Time frame:
Within 5 days of surgery start time
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Fever
ParticipantsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Number of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Fever1614
SecondaryNumber of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Infection

All participants that experience infections that occur during the time frame

Time frame:
Within 5 days of surgery start time
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Infection
ParticipantsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Number of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Infection64
SecondaryNumber of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Transfusion Reaction.

All participants that experience transfusion reactions that occur during the time frame

Time frame:
Within 5 days of surgery start time
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Transfusion Reaction.
ParticipantsPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Number of Participants That Experienced an Adverse Event of Transfusion Reaction.00
SecondaryFibrinogen Level

Fibrinogen level most proximal to the end of surgery

Time frame:
Most proximal to end of procedure
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Fibrinogen Level
mg/dLPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Fibrinogen Level197 ± 52201 ± 38

Adverse events

Collected over Serious adverse events: 5 days post-procedure. All cause-mortality: 30 days or discharge from hospital, whichever occurred first.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patients Given Traditional Cryo5/105 (4.8%)0/105 (0%)18/105 (17.1%)
Patients Given PR Cryo2/103 (1.9%)0/103 (0%)17/103 (16.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
Transfusion ReactionsBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1050/103
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPatients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR Cryo
FeverInfections and infestations16/10514/103
InfectionInfections and infestations6/1054/103

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Patients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR CryoTotal
Mean62 ± 1461 ± 1461 ± 14
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR CryoTotal
Female394180
Male6662128
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR CryoTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino14115
Unknown or Not Reported91102193
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Patients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR CryoTotal
United States105103208
ASA Score
ASA Score(Score on a scale)Patients Given Traditional CryoPatients Given PR CryoTotal
Mean3.8 ± 0.513.8 ± 0.433.8 ± 0.47
08

Study locations

1 site
  • New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Arnup SJ, Forbes AB, Kahan BC, Morgan KE, McKenzie JE. Appropriate statistical methods were infrequently used in cluster-randomized crossover trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 26. PubMed 26633599 ↗
  • Saland LC. Effects of reserpine administration on the fine structure of the rat pars intermedia. Cell Tissue Res. 1978 Nov 9;194(1):115-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00209237. PubMed 719724 ↗
  • Cushing MM, Fitzgerald MM, Harris RM, Asmis LM, Haas T. Influence of cryoprecipitate, Factor XIII, and fibrinogen concentrate on hyperfibrinolysis. Transfusion. 2017 Oct;57(10):2502-2510. doi: 10.1111/trf.14259. Epub 2017 Jul 21. PubMed 28734018 ↗
  • Cushing MM, Haas T, Karkouti K, Callum J. Which is the preferred blood product for fibrinogen replacement in the bleeding patient with acquired hypofibrinogenemia-cryoprecipitate or fibrinogen concentrate? Transfusion. 2020 Jun;60 Suppl 3:S17-S23. doi: 10.1111/trf.15614. Epub 2020 Jun 1. PubMed 32478877 ↗
  • Fenderson JL, Meledeo MA, Rendo MJ, Peltier GC, McIntosh CS, Davis KW, Corley JB, Cap AP. Hemostatic characteristics of thawed, pooled cryoprecipitate stored for 35 days at refrigerated and room temperatures. Transfusion. 2019 Apr;59(S2):1560-1567. doi: 10.1111/trf.15180. PubMed 30980741 ↗
  • Bulkley GB, Wheaton LG, Strandberg JD, Zuidema GD. Assessment of small intestinal recovery from ischemic injury after segmental, arterial, venous, and arteriovenous occlusion. Surg Forum. 1979;30:210-3. No abstract available. PubMed 538597 ↗
  • Hsien S, Dayton JD, Chen D, Stock A, Bacha E, Cushing MM, Nellis ME. Hemostatic efficacy of pathogen-reduced platelets in children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Transfusion. 2022 Feb;62(2):298-305. doi: 10.1111/trf.16768. Epub 2021 Dec 13. PubMed 34904250 ↗
  • Lokhandwala PM, O'Neal A, Patel EU, Brunker PAR, Gehrie EA, Zheng G, Kickler TS, Ness PM, Tobian AAR. Hemostatic profile and safety of pooled cryoprecipitate up to 120 hours after thawing. Transfusion. 2018 May;58(5):1126-1131. doi: 10.1111/trf.14550. Epub 2018 Feb 25. PubMed 29479708 ↗
  • Thomson C, Sobieraj-Teague M, Scott D, Duncan E, Abraham S, Roxby D. Extending the post-thaw viability of cryoprecipitate. Transfusion. 2021 May;61(5):1578-1585. doi: 10.1111/trf.16366. Epub 2021 Mar 17. PubMed 33728705 ↗
  • Cushing MM, Cohen T, Fitzgerald MM, Rand S, Sinfort A, Chen D, Keltner N, Ong S, Parra P, Benabdessadek D, Jimenez A, Haas T, Lau C, Girardi NI, DeSimone RA. Trial Of Pathogen-reduced Cryoprecipitate vs. Cryoprecipitated AHF to Lower Operative Transfusions (TOP-CLOT): study protocol for a single center, prospective, cluster randomized trial. Trials. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08398-x. PubMed 39334317 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 24, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05711524
Lead sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Collaborators
Cerus Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2023
Start date
Apr 1, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 23, 2024
Completion
Oct 3, 2025
Results posted
Nov 21, 2025
Last update
Nov 21, 2025

Study contacts

Melissa Cushing
principal investigator · Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion