ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05706623Updated Jul 10, 2025Results posted

A Phase 1 Open-Label Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Single Dose of Apraglutide in Subjects With Normal and Impaired Hepatic Function

A Phase 1 interventional study of Apraglutide in Hepatic Impairment, sponsored by VectivBio AG. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-10.

Sponsored by VectivBio AG (part of Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of apraglutide in subjects with hepatic impairment compared with matched control subjects with normal hepatic function following single subcutaneous (SC) dose administration.

Read the detailed description

A two stage design, open label, multi-center, non-randomized trial to evaluate the the safety and tolerability of a single subcutaneous dose of apraglutide in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic function. The hepatic function will estimated with the Child-Pugh classification.

Part 1: 8 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Cohort 1) and 8 subjects with normal hepatic function (Cohort 2).

Part 2: 8 subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Cohort 3) and 8 subjects with normal hepatic function (from Cohort 2 where possible and additional subject). Part 2 will be conducted only if the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) or area under the curve from zero to the last measurable point (AUClast) for the moderate hepatic impairment group compared to the control group is ≥2.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatic Impairment

Keywords

  • Hepatic Impairment
  • Liver Function
  • Hepatic Function
03

In context

Lead sponsor

VectivBio AG is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (57%) have results posted.

First submitted before VectivBio AG became part of Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc..

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All Participants:

  • Age between 18 and 75 years inclusive
  • Subjects who are willing and able to comply with the study procedures
  • Subjects able to understand and willing to sign the
  • (BMI) of ≥18 to ≤35 kg/m2; and a total body weight of >50 kg (110 lb).
  • Women of (WOCBP) on highly effective method of during the trial and for 1 month after the end of trial (EOT) visit. Sterilized or infertile or females.
  • Male subjects with a female partner of childbearing potential: highly effective methods of contraception and no sperm donation during the trial and for 1 month after (EOT) visit.

Participants with impaired hepatic function:

  • Confirmed and documented diagnosis of cirrhosis
  • Moderate liver disease ( B): clinically stable for at least 1 month prior to screening
  • Mild liver disease (Child-Pugh A): clinically stable for at least 1 month prior to screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of GI, bronchopulmonary, neurological, cardiovascular, endocrine, or allergic disease
  • Known to the medicinal product (IMP), any of their or drugs of the same class
  • If capable of reproduction, unwilling to use an effective form of
  • If a female of , a positive urine/blood pregnancy test
  • Breast-feeding women
  • Positive urine/blood test for alcohol and drugs of abuse at Screening and on Day-1
  • Use of prohibited medications or herbal remedies
  • Known presence or history of intestinal polyps
  • Known presence or history of any type of cancer
  • Pancreatic events such as acute pancreatitis, pancreatic duct stenosis, pancreas infection, and increased blood amylase and lipase (>2.0-5.0×)
  • Participation in an investigational drug or device study within 30 days prior to Screening
  • Donation of blood over 500 mL within 2 months prior to Screening
  • Heavy use of tobacco products (i.e., smokes more than 10 cigarettes per day)
  • Concomitant disease or condition that could interfere with, or for which the treatment of might interfere with, the conduct of the study, or that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the subject in this trial
  • Any intercurrent clinically significant illness in the previous 28 days before Day 1 of this study
  • Positive blood screen for (HIV) antigen/antibody combo, hepatitis A (HAV), surface antigen (HBsAgB), or virus (HCV)
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with the study protocol for any other reason
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(14)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part 1: Moderate hepatic impairment

    Child-Pugh B

    Drug: Apraglutide

  • Experimental
    Part 1: Normal hepatic function

    Drug: Apraglutide

  • Experimental
    Part 2: Mild hepatic impairment

    Child-Pugh A

    Drug: Apraglutide

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Curve to Infinity (AUCinf) of Apraglutide

    Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. AUCinf was calculated as: AUCinf = AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) + (Clast/kel) where Clast was the observed concentration at the last time point with concentrations above the lower limit of quantification and kel was the terminal elimination rate constant.

    Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose

  2. Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 168 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-168h) of Apraglutide

    Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.

    Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose

  3. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apraglutide

    Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. Cmax was the observed peak analyte concentration obtained directly from the experimental data without interpolation, expressed in concentration units.

    Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Apraglutide

    Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. Tmax was the first observed time to reach peak analyte concentration obtained directly from the experimental data without interpolation, expressed in time units.

    Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose

  2. Apparent Clearance After Extravascular Administration (CL/F) of Apraglutide

    Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.

    Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose

  3. Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of Apraglutide

    Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. Terminal elimination rate constant calculated by linear regression of the terminal log-linear portion of the concentration vs. time curve. Linear regression of at least three points and an adjusted r\^2 greater than or equal to 0.80 were required to obtain a reliable kel.

    Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose

  4. Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Apraglutide

    Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.

    Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose

  5. Apparent Volume of Distribution After Extravascular Administration (Vz/F) of Apraglutide

    Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.

    Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose

  6. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    A TEAE was any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with apraglutide, whether or not related, that occurred or worsened after the dose of apraglutide. A serious TEAE was defined as any TEAE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. TEAEs were graded for severity based on the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0 as follows from Grade 1 (mild) to Grade 5 (AE resulted in death). Clinically significant changes in physical examination findings, laboratory results, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were also recorded as TEAEs.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 14

07

Results

Posted Jun 13, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Part 2 was to be conducted if the geometric mean ratio (GMR) point estimate of apraglutide AUCinf or AUClast for the moderate hepatic impairment group compared with the control group was ≥2. As the GMR point estimate of AUCinf was \<2, the trial stopped after Part 1.

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled in 2 study sites in Slovakia and Germany and participated from February 2023 to April 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
Started88
Dosed with apraglutide88
Completed88
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryArea Under the Curve to Infinity (AUCinf) of Apraglutide

Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. AUCinf was calculated as: AUCinf = AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) + (Clast/kel) where Clast was the observed concentration at the last time point with concentrations above the lower limit of quantification and kel was the terminal elimination rate constant.

Time frame:
Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · h*ng/mL
Area Under the Curve to Infinity (AUCinf) of Apraglutide
h*ng/mLNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
Area Under the Curve to Infinity (AUCinf) of Apraglutide4481 ± 64.53744 ± 50.2
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Hepatic Function Group vs Moderate Hepatic Impairment Group · Geometric least squares (ls) mean ratio: 0.8354 · 90% CI 0.5216 to 1.338
PrimaryArea Under the Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 168 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-168h) of Apraglutide

Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.

Time frame:
Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · h*ng/mL
Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 168 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-168h) of Apraglutide
h*ng/mLNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 168 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-168h) of Apraglutide4271 ± 65.23605 ± 50.2
PrimaryMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apraglutide

Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. Cmax was the observed peak analyte concentration obtained directly from the experimental data without interpolation, expressed in concentration units.

Time frame:
Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apraglutide
ng/mLNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Apraglutide58.3 ± 68.354.6 ± 43.1
Statistical analysis
  • Normal Hepatic Function Group vs Moderate Hepatic Impairment Group · Geometric ls mean ratio: 0.9356 · 90% CI 0.5889 to 1.4864
SecondaryTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Apraglutide

Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. Tmax was the first observed time to reach peak analyte concentration obtained directly from the experimental data without interpolation, expressed in time units.

Time frame:
Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Apraglutide
hoursNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Apraglutide32.03 (27.97 to 48.15)31.76 (12.00 to 36.00)
SecondaryApparent Clearance After Extravascular Administration (CL/F) of Apraglutide

Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.

Time frame:
Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · L/h
Apparent Clearance After Extravascular Administration (CL/F) of Apraglutide
L/hNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
Apparent Clearance After Extravascular Administration (CL/F) of Apraglutide1.12 ± 64.51.34 ± 50.2
SecondaryTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of Apraglutide

Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used. Terminal elimination rate constant calculated by linear regression of the terminal log-linear portion of the concentration vs. time curve. Linear regression of at least three points and an adjusted r\^2 greater than or equal to 0.80 were required to obtain a reliable kel.

Time frame:
Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · 1/h
Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of Apraglutide
1/hNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of Apraglutide0.0209 ± 51.60.0237 ± 44.4
SecondaryTerminal Half-life (t1/2) of Apraglutide

Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.

Time frame:
Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · hours
Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Apraglutide
hoursNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Apraglutide33.2 ± 51.629.2 ± 44.4
SecondaryApparent Volume of Distribution After Extravascular Administration (Vz/F) of Apraglutide

Apraglutide was quantified in human plasma samples using a fully validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based method, with a LLOQ of 1 ng/mL and an upper limit of 200 ng/mL. Plasma PK parameters for apraglutide were estimated using non-compartmental methods from the concentration-time profiles. Actual sampling times, rather than scheduled sampling times, were used.

Time frame:
Pre-dose Day 1; 6, 12, 24, 28, 36, 40, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 240, and 312 hours post-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · liters
Apparent Volume of Distribution After Extravascular Administration (Vz/F) of Apraglutide
litersNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
Apparent Volume of Distribution After Extravascular Administration (Vz/F) of Apraglutide53.4 ± 91.156.2 ± 69.4
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE was any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with apraglutide, whether or not related, that occurred or worsened after the dose of apraglutide. A serious TEAE was defined as any TEAE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. TEAEs were graded for severity based on the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0 as follows from Grade 1 (mild) to Grade 5 (AE resulted in death). Clinically significant changes in physical examination findings, laboratory results, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were also recorded as TEAEs.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Day 14
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
At least one TEAE01
At least one serious TEAE00
At least one TEAE leading to discontinuation00
Any mild TEAE01
Any moderate TEAE01
Any related TEAE01

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 to Day 14. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Normal Hepatic Function Group0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)
Moderate Hepatic Impairment Group0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)1/8 (12.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventNormal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment Group
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/81/8
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/81/8

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Normal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupTotal
Mean58.3 (41 to 71)58.8 (42 to 75)58.5 (41 to 75)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Normal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupTotal
Female336
Male5510
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Normal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino8816
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Normal Hepatic Function GroupModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White8816
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • APEX
    Münich, Germany
  • Summit Clinical Research
    Bratislava, Slovakia
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05706623
Lead sponsor
VectivBio AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2023
Start date
Jan 30, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 4, 2023
Completion
Apr 4, 2023
Results posted
Jun 13, 2025
Last update
Jul 10, 2025

Study contacts

Tomasz Masior
study director · VectivBio AG

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Apraglutide

Start the discussion