ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05702671Updated May 6, 2023

Kenota 1 CWS Method Comparison Validation Study

An observational study in Allergy and Immunoglobulin E-Mediated Allergic Disorder, sponsored by Kenota Inc.. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-06.

Sponsored by Kenota Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
411
Ages
Up to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this Method Comparison Study is to compare total IgE results obtained from at least 360 subjects aged less than 80 years old using four different testing arms comprising three types of samples and two testing methods. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Are the Kenota 1 Devices easy to use by untrained operators at a clinic environment?
  • Do tIgE results provided by the Kenota 1 Devices match the results provided by the FDA-cleared Phadia ImmunoCAP System?

Subjects will be asked to donate two fingerstick whole blood samples and one venous blood draw.

Read the detailed description

The Method Comparison Study will compare total IgE results obtained from at least 360 subjects aged less than 80 years old using four different testing arms. comprising three types of samples and two testing methods.

Arm (A): Fresh fingerstick whole blood will be collected and tested on Kenota 1 Devices at three CLIA-Waived sites (CWSs).

Arm (B): Venous plasma will be collected at the CWSs and tested on Kenota 1 Devices at the central lab site.

Arm (C): Venous plasma will be collected at the CWSs and tested on Phadia instruments (ImmunoCAP) at the central lab site.

Arm (D): Venous whole blood will be collected at the CWSs and tested on Kenota 1 Devices at the central lab site.

The first method for this study is the Kenota 1 System, which will be used across Three (3) U.S. CWSs. At each CWS, 120 subjects will be recruited and will be asked to donate fingerstick blood and venous blood.

Three (3) untrained operators at each site will be running the freshly collected fingerstick blood samples on the Kenota 1 Devices provided at the site (Testing Arm A). Site operators will also process and store the collected venous blood and venous plasma samples as instructed, and ship them to the central lab for further testing.

The second method for this study involves testing at a Central US Laboratory as a CLIA-regulated laboratory.

At the central lab, at least one trained lab operator will run frozen venous plasma (testing Arm B) and frozen venous whole blood (testing Arm D) collected from all subjects using the Kenota 1 Devices provided at the central lab. As the comparator method, one lab operator will run a second set of frozen plasma samples collected from all subjects on the Phadia ImmunoCAP System (testing Arm C).

The Method Comparison Validation Study is expected to be completed within two months and will be run in conjunction with the Multi-Site Reproducibility Validation Study. All testing will include a daily External Control session on each device used, ensuring the devices are performing as expected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Allergy
  • Immunoglobulin E-Mediated Allergic Disorder

Keywords

  • Point of Care
  • Total Immunoglobulin E (tIgE) level in blood
  • Fingerstick
  • Kenota 1 System
  • Kenota 1 Device
  • Allergy Clinics
  • Allergist
03

In context

Hypersensitivity

1,055 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 149 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 411 is above the median of 166 across 327 observational studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.

Browse Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Kenota Inc. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Study population will be selected from existing and new patients visiting the allergist clinic, as well as individuals from the clinic such as volunteering staff members.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages \<80 years
  • From all Ethnic/Racial backgrounds

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with skin damage, burns or scars at the site of venipuncture on both arms
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
411 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
None retained

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testTotal Immunoglobulin E, Obtained From Fingerstick Sample

    The Kenota 1 System is intended to be a specialized tool in a professional allergist setting. It will help streamline the patient testing process by bringing quantitative, minimally invasive fingerstick IgE blood testing to the allergy clinic.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total IgE Value

    Tests performed on the Kenota 1 Devices will provide tIgE values in kU/L for each test. These values will be compared directly with the tIgE results produced by the comparator method, Phadia ImmunoCAP system, which are also in kU/L. The Slope, Intercept and Correlation Coefficient will be calculated and used to determine if overall proportional bias of Kenota 1 fresh fingerstick whole blood is less than 10% compared to the comparator method.

    Time frame: One day

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • St. Paul Allergy & Asthma
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116, United States
  • Allergy Partners of Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, United States
  • Children's Specialty Group
    Virginia Beach, Virginia 23456, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No participant personal data will be shared. The information collected will only be in the Informed Consent Form and will be kept at the Site only for maximum of 3years

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2023 to primary completion in Apr 2023, 2 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 8, 2022
First posted
Jan 27, 2023
StartActual
Jan 27, 2023
Primary completionActual
Apr 7, 2023
CompletionActual
Apr 7, 2023
Last update
May 6, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05702671
Lead sponsor
Kenota Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2023
Start date
Jan 27, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 7, 2023
Completion
Apr 7, 2023
Last update
May 6, 2023

Study contacts

Christopher Harder, PhD
principal investigator · Kenota Health

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion