ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05699928Updated Feb 7, 2025

Accuracy of Community General Pediatrician Diagnosis of Autism Compared to a Multidisciplinary Team Assessment

An observational study in Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 0 Months to 64 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-07.

Sponsored by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2022; still recruiting 3 years 11 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200
Ages
0 Months to 64 Months
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 22 studies in Autism Spectrum Disorder by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital — 5 open to participants now, 6 under way, none of them phase 3. Autism Spectrum Disorder · Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital.

Started
2022
with 3 others
Observational
Only one
of the 22
Registered
19th of 22
by date

Among the 22 studies in Autism Spectrum Disorder by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, this one is one of 4 that started in 2022, is the only observational one, and was the 19th registered.

Autism Spectrum Disorder

1,727 studies on the registry are indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder; 500 are open to participants now.

Browse Autism Spectrum Disorder studies →

Open to participants now

5 of the 22 studies in Autism Spectrum Disorder by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 5 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 349 Autism Spectrum Disorder studies recruiting now, 48 (14%) set no upper age limit and 294 (84%) stop at 75 or younger; 298 take children under 18; 92 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 0 Months to 64 Months · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 22 studies in Autism Spectrum Disorder by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goals of this diagnostic study are to determine how accurate general pediatricians are in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnostic assessment and which children might be best suited for this type of assessment. The investigators will also evaluate the use of a new virtual diagnostic tool, the Autism Assessment for Preschoolers with Language Element Sequence (AAPLES).

The investigators will recruit twenty general pediatricians from across Ontario, Canada, as well as 200 of their patients (maximum 10 per pediatrician) who have been referred with possible ASD. The general pediatrician will complete their assessment and decide on a diagnosis, but will not tell the family. The ASD expert team, consisting of a developmental paediatrician and a psychologist, will also perform a diagnostic assessment without knowing the general pediatrician's opinion. The team will inform the family of their diagnostic opinion. Investigators will determine the diagnostic agreement between the two assessments. They will then determine which of the child's characteristics (age, sex, racial/ethnic background, ASD features, developmental delays, having a sibling with ASD) predict agreement in diagnosis.

Some children in the study will have the option of undergoing an additional virtual autism diagnostic assessment using the AAPLES. The clinician administering the AAPLES will not know the results of the other assessments. The investigators will measure diagnostic agreement between the clinician administering the AAPLES and the expert team.

Read the detailed description

Increasing rates of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis have contributed to lengthy waits for expert diagnostic assessment that negatively impact ASD outcomes. Many ASD diagnostic guidelines state that an expert team is needed to make the diagnosis; although some children currently receive their diagnosis from a community-based clinician, e.g. a general paediatrician. There are very few studies of the accuracy of general pediatricians in diagnosing ASD.

The aims of this project are to:

  1. determine accuracy of general pediatrician ASD diagnosis compared to an expert team assessment;
  2. to determine child features associated with accurate diagnosis by general pediatricians (possible features include: child's age; gender; cultural background; ASD features; developmental delays; and having a sibling with ASD; pediatrician certainty; virtual versus in person assessment);
  3. to identify general pediatrician factors associated with accurate diagnosis (possible features include pediatrician years in practice, gender, rurality, extra training in child development, use of tools in the assessment, time spent on the assessment);
  4. to determine the concordance between an assessment with the AAPLES virtual tool and the expert team assessment.

Investigators will recruit twenty general pediatricians from across Ontario, as well as 200 of their patients (10 per general pediatrician) who have been referred with possible ASD. The general pediatrician will complete their assessment and decide on a diagnosis, but will not tell the family. The ASD expert team, consisting of a developmental paediatrician and a psychologist, will also perform a diagnostic assessment without knowing the general pediatrician's opinion. The team will inform the family of their diagnostic opinion. Investigators will determine the diagnostic agreement between the two assessments. They will then determine which of the child's characteristics (age, sex, cultural background, ASD severity, developmental delays, having a sibling with ASD) predict agreement in diagnosis. Exploratory analyses will be done on pediatrician factors associated with diagnostic accuracy, analyzing pediatrician years in practice, gender, rurality, extra training in child development, use of tools in the assessment, and time spent on the assessment. Children meeting the criteria for the AAPLES will be offered an additional virtual assessment where a trained clinician, blinded to the previous assessment results, will administer the AAPLES and record their diagnostic opinion. Investigators will measure agreement between this opinion and the expert team.

03

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Months to 64 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

General pediatricians are eligible for participation if they: 1) practice in Ontario; 2) see at least one child per month with possible ASD; and 3) have not completed subspecialty training in developmental pediatrics. Consecutive children with possible ASD meeting inclusion criteria will be enrolled from each participating pediatrician (maximum of 10 per pediatrician).

Eligibility criteria

Child Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be referred to a general pediatrician participating in the study with any of the following issues: 1) Failed 18-month developmental screen (other than isolated motor delay); 2) Speech/language delay; 3) Social/emotional delay/concern; 4) Behavioral concerns, inattention, hyperactivity, or impulsivity; 5) Global developmental delay/concern; 6) A referral with a query of ASD.
  • Age \<5 years 6 months
  • Resident of Ontario, Canada (support for travel is available for participants who live >100 km from Toronto)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child has already received a diagnosis of ASD

For the AAPLES exploratory objective:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child has a developmental age of 36 months or more (determined on Mullen Scales of Early Learning)
  • Child has flexible phrase speech

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child has previously completed a virtual ASD diagnostic assessment
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testGeneral pediatrician autism diagnostic assessment

    General pediatricians will assess children for possible autism spectrum disorder diagnosis as they usually would (i.e. no specific tests will be required).

  • Diagnostic testMultidisciplinary team diagnostic assessment

    The multidisciplinary team will assess children for possible autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. The team consists of a developmental pediatrician, a psychologist, and a psychometrist. Administered tests include the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised (ADI-R; a developmental history will be substituted for children with a developmental age of \<18 months), the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), and the Mullen Scales of Early Learning. When needed and available, the team will call a preschool or school teacher to gather more information about the child.

  • Diagnostic testAutism Assessment for Preschoolers with Language Element Sequence

    The AAPLES was developed at the Glenrose/Holland Bloorview and is designed for children who have flexible phrase speech. The assessment will be conducted virtually over Zoom Health by a trained clinician. This tool involves coaching the caregiver to interact with the child in specific ways to allow a trained professional to observe for features of ASD while watching remotely. It should take about 30-45 minutes. The individual who conducts the assessment will be blinded to the results of the other assessments. This virtual assessment will occur after the other assessments have been completed so as to not delay the child receiving a potential diagnosis.

    Also known as: AAPLES

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy measures

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, kappa

    Time frame: Within 6 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Child-level predictors of accurate assessment

    Investigators will conduct a logistic regression to determine the odds ratio of accurate assessment (agreement between general pediatrician and multi-disciplinary team) for each of the following factors: child age, gender, racial/ethnic background, ASD features (ADOS composite score), developmental level (Mullen Scales of Early Learning Visual Reception T-score), having an autistic sibling, pediatrician certainty (5-point Likert scale), and virtual versus in-person assessment. Regression models will be run for each of: 1) children diagnosed with ASD by the multi-disciplinary team; and 2) children not diagnosed with ASD by the multi-disciplinary team.

    Time frame: Within 6 weeks

  2. General pediatrician predictors of accurate assessment (exploratory)

    Investigators will conduct a regression measuring the association between general pediatrician correct classification rate (number of children correctly diagnosed out of total number assessed) and general pediatrician gender, years in practice, practice location, extra training in child development, use of tools in the assessment, and time spent on the assessment.

    Time frame: Within 6 weeks

  3. AAPLES accuracy measures (exploratory)

    Comparing the diagnostic opinion of the assessor completing the AAPLES with the multi-disciplinary team, measuring sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, kappa

    Time frame: Within 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2025, 28 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 4, 2023
First posted
Jan 26, 2023
StartActual
Nov 24, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2025
Last update
Feb 7, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 7, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05699928
Lead sponsor
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2023
Start date
Nov 24, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 7, 2025

Study contacts

Lili Senman
Contact
lsenman@hollandbloorview.ca
416-425-6220 ext. 6517
Melanie Penner, MSc MD
principal investigator · Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion