CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05693545Updated Jun 22, 2026

GOALIE: Intramuscular vs. Enteral Penicillin Prophylaxis to Prevent Progression of Latent RHD Trial

A Phase 2 interventional study of phenoxymethyl penicillin and intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis in Rheumatic Heart Disease, sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Uganda. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-22.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,004
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if twice daily oral penicillin prophylaxis is non-inferior to monthly IM penicillin prophylaxis in preventing latent Rheumatic Heart Disease Progression in children between the ages of 5-17 years. The main objective is to compare the proportion of children aged 5-17 years with latent RHD receiving oral penicillin prophylaxis who progress to worse valvular disease at 2-years compared to children who receive IM penicillin prophylaxis.

Read the detailed description

GOALIS is a randomized controlled trial developed to provide high quality contemporary evidence on the efficacy of oral penicillin as RHD prophylaxis.

Aim 1: To compare the proportion of children aged 5-17 years with latent RHD receiving oral penicillin prophylaxis who progress to worse valvular disease at 2-years compared to children who receive IM penicillin prophylaxis.

Aim 2: To evaluate the economic equivalence and cost-effectiveness of oral penicillin compared to IM penicillin, after echocardiographic screening for latent RHD detection.

Aim 3: Compare patient-reported outcomes (treatment acceptance, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life) between children receiving oral and IM penicillin prophylaxis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatic Heart Disease
03

In context

Rheumatic Heart Disease

59 studies on the registry are indexed under Rheumatic Heart Disease; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,004 is above the median of 221 across 35 interventional studies indexed under Rheumatic Heart Disease.

Browse Rheumatic Heart Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 661 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 54 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Has a new diagnosis of latent RHD detected through primary or secondary school echocardiographic screening.
  • Has agreed to participate in the study via the study's informed consent/assent process.

Operational Definition of Latent RHD Borderline RHD or Mild Definite RHD (to include no more than mild regurgitation at the mitral or aortic valve, normal mean mitral and aortic valve gradients, normal bi-ventricular function) according to the 2012 WHF consensus criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known history of ARF or RHD
  • Newly diagnosed RHD by echo screening considered to be "missed clinical RHD" as compared to true latent RHD including: > mild pathological valvular regurgitation at the mitral valve or aortic valve, mitral stenosis (mean MV gradient ≥ 4mmHg) (definite B61), aortic stenosis (mean AV gradient ≥ 20mmHg)
  • Structural or functional cardiac defects, other than those consistent with RHD, that were known prior to or detected through echo screening (except patent foramen ovale, small atrial septal defect, small ventricular septal defect, small patent ductus arteriosus)
  • Self-report of prior allergic reaction to penicillin
  • Any known conditions predisposing to thrombocytopenia or hypercoagulability, or other contraindications to intramuscular injection
  • Any known co-morbid conditions (ex. HIV, renal deficiencies, severe malnutrition) that have resulted in prescription of regular antibiotic prophylaxis)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,004 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Oral Pencillin

    Oral phenoxymethyl penicillin (Pen V) prophylaxis 250mg twice daily.

    Drug: phenoxymethyl penicillin

  • Active comparator
    IM Penicillin

    Intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis (600,000 IU for children \<30kg, 1.2 million IU for children ≥30kg), every 28 days

    Drug: intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis

Interventions

  • Drugphenoxymethyl penicillin

    Prophylaxis

    Also known as: Pen V

  • Drugintramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis

    Prophylaxis

    Also known as: benzathine penicillin G, BPG, penicillin prophylaxis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression

    Progression of echocardiographic features of latent RHD to borderline to definite, or definite to mild or definite to moderate/severe

    Time frame: 2 year endpoint

Secondary outcomes

  1. Demonstrate non-inferior costs and cost-effectiveness of oral penicillin compared to IM penicillin

    The aim is to understand the costs and effectiveness of the intervention. Costs will include intervention and disease specific costs, capturing both health system and family out of pocket costs. Participants will complete a questionnaire asking about out-of-pocket cost (medications, supplies, consultation fees) and lost productivity (including missed school and workdays) due to the intervention. Costs will be measured in the local currency (Uganda Shillings) and presented in United States dollars (USD)

    Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization

  2. Obtain cost data associated with the receipt of oral or IM penicillin in the community from a healthcare provider perspective.

    In order to understand health center and community costs, 10 randomly selected health care facilities (including level II, III, and IV facilities) will be surveyed to obtain direct costs of medications, supplies as well as any administration and professional fees associated with outpatient and inpatient visits.

    Time frame: 2 year endpoint

  3. Treatment Acceptance

    Treatment acceptance will be assessed with the widely-used Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) questionnaire, a generic medication acceptance instrument validated for chronic conditions. This 25-item survey consists of six areas of focus: medication convenience (3 items), length of treatment (2 items), medication constraints (9 items), medication side effects (5 items), medication effectiveness (3 items), medication advantages (3 items). Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and scores of 1 through 4 indicating increasing levels of acceptance.

    Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization

  4. Treatment Satisfaction

    Treatment Satisfaction will be assessed with the 14-item Abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (v 1.4). This widely used survey contains 4 areas of focus including satisfaction of treatment effectiveness (3 items), satisfaction with treatment side effects (5 items), satisfaction with treatment convenience (3 items), and a global treatment satisfaction (3 items). Scores are then transformed to a score of 0-100 to create the overall scale score and the subcategory scores, with higher scores representing higher treatment satisfaction on that domain.

    Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization

  5. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Health Related Quality of Life will be measured using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core (PedsQL 4.0) questionnaire. The PedsQLTM4.0 is a 23-item survey for children aged 5-18 which assesses HRQOL. It has four areas of focus: Physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (5 items), social functioning (5 items), school functioning (5 items). Each item has five possible responses measuring the extent to which the item was a problem during the past month. The possible responses are measured using a 5-point Likert scale from 0=never a problem to 4 = almost always a problem. These reverse scaled scores are then transformed to a score of 0-100 to create the overall scaled score and the subcategory scores, with higher scores representing better quality of life.

    Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization

  6. Patient-reported outcomes

    Interviews will be used to collect qualitative data around participants perceptions of the impact of RHD and its treatment on their activities of daily living and quality of life including experiences with IM or oral penicillin prophylaxis.

    Time frame: baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Uganda Heart Institute
    Kampala, Uganda, Uganda
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rwebembera J, Ndagire E, Carvalho N, Webel AR, Sable C, Okello E, Sarnacki R, Spaziani AM, Mucunguzi A, Engelman D, Grobler A, Steer A, Beaton A. Intramuscular versus enteral penicillin prophylaxis to prevent progression of rheumatic heart disease: Study protocol for a noninferiority randomized trial (the GOALIE trial). Am Heart J. 2024 Sep;275:74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.012. Epub 2024 May 24. PubMed 38797460 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05693545
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Collaborators
Uganda Heart Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2023
Start date
Sep 1, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 22, 2026

Study contacts

Andrea Z Beaton
principal investigator · Cincinnati Chidren's hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion