A Phase 4 interventional study of Intracept Procedure in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Neuro Spine and Pain Center of Key West. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 84 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-21.
Sponsored by Neuro Spine and Pain Center of Key West · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
This is an independent prospective, noninterventional, single arm post market data collection of the patient-reported effectiveness, ongoing safety, and satisfaction outcomes for patients treated with intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation using the Intracept Procedure at a single study site.
Participants in the study will have three study visits over a period of one-year (one prior to procedure and 2 post their procedure). Study visits will be conducted in person by the principal investigator and/or authorized and trained clinical research coordinators at the study site. Participants will be consented and evaluated for inclusion/exclusion criteria and a baseline collect at the initial visit (prior to procedure). Participants will be followed post intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation at 1, 3, 6, and 12, and 24 months.
Primary and secondary objectives are based on patient reported outcomes for functional improvement (Oswestry Disability Index), low back pain reduction (Visual Analog Scale), and physical and mental health pre and post procedure (EQ-5D-5L and SF-36).
2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.
Browse Back Pain studies →This is the only study on the registry with Neuro Spine and Pain Center of Key West as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intraosseous radiofrequency basivertebral nerve ablation
Device: Intracept Procedure
Intraosseous radiofrequency ablation of the basivertebral nerve
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Change- 6 Months
Validated questionnaire of low back pain related disability. Compromised of 10 questions evaluating the impact of low back pain on activities of daily living. The ODI is scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). Comparison of mean ODI baseline to 6 months.
Time frame: 6 Months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Change-12 Months
Validated questionnaire of low back pain related disability. Comprised of 10 questions evaluating the impact of low back pain on activities of daily living. The ODI is scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). Comparison of mean ODI baseline to 6 months. The minimally clinically important difference is a 15-point reduction from baseline.
Time frame: 12 Months
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)- 6 Months
Change in the mean visual analog scale (VAS) low back pain score from baseline to 6-months post treatment. VAS in a 10-point numeric scale with a 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. The minimal clinically important difference is a 50% decrease in VAS from baseline.
Time frame: 6 Months
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)- 12 Months
Change in the mean visual analog scale (VAS) low back pain score from baseline to 12-months post treatment. VAS is a 10-point numeric scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. The minimally clinically important difference is a 50% decrease in VAS from baseline.
Time frame: 12 Months
ODI Responder Rate- 6 Months
Number \& percent of patients with greater than or equal to 15-point reduction in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from baseline to 6 months post treatment. ODI is scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimally disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). The minimally clinically important difference is a 15-point reduction from baseline.
Time frame: 6 Months
ODI Responder Rate- 12 Months
Number \& percent of patients with greater than or equal to 15-point reduction in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from baseline to 12 months post treatment. ODI is scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimally disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). The minimally clinically important difference is a 15-point reduction from baseline.
Time frame: 12 Months
VAS Responder Rate- 6 Months
Number and percentage of participants with a greater than or equal to a 50% reduction from baseline in visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain at 6 months post treatment. VAS is a patient-reported 10-point numeric pain scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. The minimally clinically important difference in VAS from baseline is a 50% reduction.
Time frame: 6 Months
VAS Responder Rate-12 Months
Number and percentage of participants with a greater than or equal to a 50% reduction from baseline in visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain at 12 months post treatment. VAS is a patient-reported 10-point numeric pain scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. The minimal clinically important difference in VAS from baseline is a 50% reduction.
Time frame: 12 Months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.